RESUMEN
Introduction: Brachial plexus injury (BPI) can result in complete loss of neurological function and reduces the quality of life. Nerve transfer, nerve grafting, external neurolysis, and free functional muscle transfer are several management options that determine the eventual outcomes. Despite various methods of treatment, hardly any literature compares directly the result of these treatment options. This study aimed to analyze differences in clinical and functional outcomes after a reconstructive surgery. Methods: A cohort retrospective study was conducted on traumatic brachial plexus injured patients aged from 17 to 65 years at one hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia, from January 2009 to December 2019. All patients were divided into 4 groups depending on the types of surgery. The clinical outcomes were measured using elbow and shoulder muscle strength, elbow and shoulder range of motion (ROM), and pain level (measured using Visual Analog Scale/VAS); the functional outcomes were measured using the overall quality of life using the DASH (disabilities of the arms, shoulder, and hand) score. Results: This study included 316 patients comprising of 256 males with an average age of 27.53 ± 11.37, an average time from injury to surgery of 17.74 ± 35.82 months, and average follow-up duration of 59.89 ± 37.68 months. Most cases were caused by road traffic accidents (77.22%) and most were total arm type of BPI injury (70.7%). There was no significant difference in the mean values of study parameters except in VAS (p = 0.042) as nerve grafting resulted in less pain than external neurolysis (2.27 ± 1.03 vs. 3.68 ± 1.93, respectively; p = 0.017). Besides, nerve transfer procedure also resulted in less pain compared to external neurolysis (2.99 ± 1.84 vs. 3.68 ± 1.93, respectively; p = 0.036). Conclusion: We found no significant difference between types of surgery and the postsurgical outcome. A wider multicenter study was required to define the clinical and functional outcomes clearly.
RESUMEN
Despite rapid medical technology development, various challenges exist in three- and four-part proximal humeral fracture (PHF) management. This condition has led to a notably increased use of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA); however, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is still the most widely performed procedure. Thus, these two modalities are crucial and require further discussion. We aim to compare the outcomes of three- or four-part PHF surgeries using ORIF and RTSA based on direct/head-to-head comparative studies.We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Cochrane handbook and PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and CENTRAL (Cochrane Library) from inception to October 2020. Our protocol was registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020214681). We assessed the individual study risk of bias using ROB 2 and ROBINS-I tools, then appraised our evidence using the GRADE approach.Six head-to-head comparative studies were included, comprising one RCT and five retrospective case-control studies. We found that RTSA significantly improved forward flexion but was comparable to ORIF in abduction (p = 0.03 and p = 0.47, respectively) and more inferior in external rotation (p < 0.0001). Moreover, RTSA improved the overall Constant-Murley score, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.22). Interestingly, RTSA increased complications (by 42%) but reduced the revision surgery rates (by 63%) compared to ORIF (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively).RTSA is recommended to treat patients aged 65 years or older with a three- or four-part PHF. Compared to ORIF, RTSA resulted in better forward flexion and Constant-Murley score, equal abduction, less external rotation, increased complications but fewer revision surgeries. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:941-955. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210049.