Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this case series was to review the management of burn patients who requested ultrarapid opioid detoxification under anesthesia after extended duration of narcotic use for chronic pain related to burn injury. METHODS: The treatment plan of six opioid-dependent burn patients was analyzed to assess the effectiveness of our detoxification practice to date. Demographic and clinical information was used to characterize the patient population served: age, burn size, injury severity, duration of narcotic use before detoxification intervention, and length of hospitalization stay. Daily narcotic consumption, in morphine equivalent units, was noted both before and after detoxification. RESULTS: Six burn patients (average age, 31 years) underwent detoxification at the Burn Center during a hospitalization lasting between 1 day and 2 days. Average burn size was 38% total body surface area (range, 17-65); average Injury Severity Score was 30 (range, 25-38). Mean duration of narcotic use was 672 days (range, 239-1,156 days); average use of narcotics at time of detoxification was >200 units daily. Mean outpatient consumption for opioids after the intervention was minimal (<25 units/d). No complications were noted during any procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The results of ultrarapid opioid detoxification under anesthesia suggests that it is safe and effective for treating opioid addiction in military burn casualties when a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach is used. Safety and effectiveness to date validate current practice and supports incorporation into clinical practice guidelines. Further clinical research is warranted to identify those patients who may benefit most from detoxification and to determine the timing of such treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This is the first controlled study to explore whether adjunctive immersive virtual reality (VR) can reduce excessive pain of soldiers with combat-related burn injuries during wound debridement. METHODS: Patients were US soldiers burned in combat attacks involving explosive devices in Iraq or Afghanistan. During the same wound care session using a within-subject experimental design, 12 patients received half of their severe burn wound cleaning procedure (~6 minutes) with standard of care pharmacologies and half while in VR (treatment order randomized). Three 0 to 10 Graphic Rating Scale pain scores for each of the treatment conditions served as the primary variables. RESULTS: Patients reported significantly less pain when distracted with VR. "Worst pain" (pain intensity) dropped from 6.25 of 10 to 4.50 of 10. "Pain unpleasantness" ratings dropped from "moderate" (6.25 of 10) to "mild" (2.83 of 10). "Time spent thinking about pain" dropped from 76% during no VR to 22% during VR. Patients rated "no VR" as "no fun at all" (<1 of 10) and rated VR as "pretty fun" (7.5 of 10). Follow-up analyses showed VR was especially effective for the six patients who scored 7 of 10 or higher (severe to excruciating) on the "worst pain" (pain intensity) ratings. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results provide the first evidence from a controlled study that adjunctive immersive VR reduced pain of patients with combat-related burn injuries during severe burn wound debridement. Pain reduction during VR was greatest in patients with the highest pain during no VR. These patients were the first to use a unique custom robot-like arm mounted VR goggle system.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute pain after injury affects the comfort and function of the wounded soldier and the physiology of multiple body systems. In the civilian population, pain alters the function of the autonomic nervous system, causing increased heart rate and blood pressure. However, there are no data regarding the impact of combat-related pain on physiologic responses. This study is a retrospective analysis that examined the relationship of pain and physiologic parameters in injured soldiers. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, the Joint Trauma Theater Registry (JTTR) was queried to identify soldiers who had pain scores recorded in the Emergency Department (ED) in theater. Subject data collected from the JTTR included the following: pain score, Injury Severity Score (ISS), blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate. RESULTS: We identified 2,646 soldiers with pain scores recorded in the ED. The pain score was not related to most physiologic parameters measured in the ED. Pain intensity had no correlation with blood pressure or heart rate. However, there were relationships between the pain score and respiratory rate, with patients reporting a pain score of 10 having a slightly higher respiratory rate. Increasing pain scores were also associated with increased ISS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to data from civilian patients, early pain scores were not related to heart rate or blood pressure. A pain score of 10 corresponded to an increased respiratory rate. Despite little relationship between pain and injury severity in the civilian population, the increasing ISS was proportional to the pain scale in wounded soldiers.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: US soldiers injured in Iraq, and civilian burn trauma patients are treated at the US Army Institute of Surgical Research. Burn patients experience extreme pain during wound care, and they typically receive opioid analgesics and anxiolytics for debridement. Virtual Reality (VR) has been applied as an adjunct to opioid analgesics for procedural pain. We describe the first use of ketamine combined with immersive VR to reduce excessive pain during wound care. CASE REPORT: A 21-year-old male US Army soldier stationed in Iraq, and a 41-year-old civilian male sustained a 13% and 50% total body surface area (TBSA) burn, respectively. Each patient received 40 mg ketamine intraveneous (IV) for wound care. Using a within-subject design, nurses conducted half of a painful segment of wound care treatments with no VR and the other half with immersive VR. Graphic pain rating scores for each of the two treatment conditions served as the dependent variables. RESULTS: Compared to ketamine + no VR, both patients reported less pain during ketamine + VR for all three pain ratings. Both patients rated wound care during no VR as "no fun at all", but those same patients rated wound care during virtual reality as either "pretty fun" or "extremely fun", and rated nausea as either "mild" or "none". CONCLUSIONS: Results from these first two cases suggest that a moderate dose of ketamine combined with immersive virtual reality distraction may be an effective multimodal analgesic regimen for reducing acute procedural pain during severe burn wound cleaning.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Early acute pain after injury has been linked to long-term patient outcomes, including the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Several studies have identified a negative correlation between early anesthetic/analgesic usage and subsequent development of PTSD. This retrospective study examined the relationship between early acute pain and severity of PTSD symptoms in soldiers with burn injuries. Of the soldiers injured in Overseas Contingency Operations who had pain scores recorded at admission to the Emergency Department, 113 had burn injuries. Of those transferred to the military burn center, 47 were screened for PTSD using the PTSD checklist-military (PCL-M) survey at least 1 month after injury. Soldiers with mild, moderate, and severe pain scores had similar Injury Severity Scores and TBSA burned (P = .339 and .570, respectively). However, there were significant differences in PCL-M scores between the mild and severe pain groups (P = .017). The pain levels positively correlated with the PCL-M score (rho = 0.41, P = .004) but not with injury severity markers (Injury Severity Score and TBSA). These data suggest that early acute pain may be related to increased PCL-M score and PTSD symptoms. The intensity of pain was not related to the injury severity, and these data also show no association between pain intensity and physiological measures, including blood pressure and heart rate. However, this is a small sample size, and many other factors likely influence PTSD development. Further study is necessary to explore the relationship between early acute pain and subsequent development of PTSD symptoms.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Midazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, is administered preoperatively and intraoperatively for amnesia and anxiolysis. Subsequently, patients often do not recall events which occurred while they were sedated. Recent studies have also reported retrograde facilitation after midazolam exposure. Posttraumatic stress disorder PTSD is based on memory of a traumatic event. Because of the concern that midazolam may enhance memory of the traumatic event in which soldiers were injured, we investigated the prevalence of PTSD in those burned soldiers who received perioperative midazolam and those who did not. We also investigated the intensity of the memories related to the traumatic event. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, all charts of US soldiers who completed the PTSD Checklist-Military (PCL-M) screening tool (2004-2008) after admission to US Army Institute of Surgical Research were reviewed to determine the number of operations, the anesthetic regime, total body surface area (TBSA) burned, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS: The PCL-M was completed by 370 burned soldiers from Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom. During surgery, 142 received midazolam, whereas 69 did not. The prevalence of PTSD was higher in soldiers receiving midazolam as compared with those who did not (29% vs. 25%) (p = 0.481). Both groups had similar injuries based on TBSA and ISS. Patients who received midazolam also had similar scores on PCL-M questions related to memory of the event. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of PTSD are not statistically different in combat casualties receiving midazolam during intraoperative procedures. Intraoperative midazolam is not associated with increased PTSD development or with increased intensity of memory of the traumatic event. Patients receiving midazolam had similar injuries (TBSA and ISS) and underwent a similar number of operations as those not receiving midazolam.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Coagulopathy and bleeding after severe injury is a common problem. Whenever caring for critically ill patients, clinicians must anticipate, recognize and manage the coagulopathy of trauma. When left untreated, cardiovascular shock and multiorgan system failure ensue. Uncompensated hemorrhage often culminates in death, highlighting the significance of recognizing the main influences in coagulopathy of trauma. RECENT FINDINGS: With recent improvements in prehospital care, trauma specialists face more challenging cases than ever before. Hemostatic transfusion strategies, with early and more aggressive use of plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate and coagulation factor isolates, decrease blood loss in trauma patients. Combined with point-of-care testing for thromboelastography, coagulation panels, lactate and local pO2, there is an opportunity for frontline trauma clinicians to directly improve patient outcomes. SUMMARY: Although mortality previously was thought to be summarily independent of medical interventions and resuscitations, we now know the opposite to be true; it is our expectation and indeed our obligation to recognize and manage the coagulopathy of trauma better than in past years. In as much as we continue to prevent acidosis, hypothermia and the progressive coagulopathy following injury, trauma victims the world over are benefiting and surviving longer, living proof that demonstrates the utility of managing the coagulopathy of trauma.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is reported to affect almost one third of the civilian burn patient population. Predisposing factors for PTSD include experiencing a traumatic event. Of Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF) soldiers returning home after deployment without injury, 17% reported cognitive symptoms of PTSD. The authors recent study of soldiers burned in OIF/OEF showed a PTSD prevalence of approximately 30%, which is similar to civilian studies. Burns are characterized by hypermetabolism and increased catecholamine levels. beta-Adrenergic receptor blocking agents, like propranolol, decrease catecholamine levels. Propranolol may reduce consolidation of memory and a prophylaxis for PTSD. This retrospective study examines the relationship between PTSD prevalence and propranolol administration. After institutional review board approval, propranolol received, number of surgeries, anesthetic/analgesic regimen, TBSA burned, and injury severity score were collected from patients charts. The military burn center received 603 soldiers injured in OIF/OEF, of which 226 completed the PTSD Checklist-Military. Thirty-one soldiers received propranolol and 34 matched soldiers did not. In propranolol patients, the prevalence of PTSD was 32.3% vs 26.5% in those not receiving propranolol (P = .785). These data suggest propranolol does not decrease PTSD development in burned soldiers. The prevalence of PTSD in patients receiving propranolol is the same as those not receiving propranolol. More research is needed to determine the relationship between PTSD and propranolol.

Asunto(s)