Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 23(4): 266-269, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30090025

RESUMEN

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignancy of bone in children and young adults, the highest incidence peak is during adolescence and doesn't have any gender predominance. The main site of metastasis are the lungs and extrapulmonary cases are occasional. The incidence of metastasis in the Central Nervous System (CNS) is 2-6.5%, increase to 10-15% in patients with pulmonary metastases. Therefore, metastatic disease of the CNS is rare and the information on such patients is limited. Here, we describe a case of a 20-year old patient diagnosed with osteosarcoma in the left distal femur stage IIB, he developed pulmonary disease, during palliative chemotherapy experienced relapse to the brain classified as recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class II, and was treated with external radiotherapy (30 Gy in 10 fractions) and later he had a poor evolution and died.

2.
Rev Invest Clin ; 70(3): 112-116, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29943771

RESUMEN

Mexico has seen an increase in cancer prevalence in its entire population as well as particular age ranges, predominantly the older segment. The most frequently reported pelvic cancers in Mexico are cervical, endometrial, bladder, prostate, rectum, and anal canal. Approximately 80% of the population diagnosed with pelvic cancers present with locally advanced tumors and require concomitant chemoradiotherapy, sequential chemoradiotherapy, or radiotherapy alone. The toxicity of any of these treatment modalities may be manifested as intestinal injury, a significant problem that can compromise the response to treatment, the patient's nutritional state, quality of life, and survival. In this article, we will approach key aspects in nutrition as well as the epidemiological characteristics and toxicities in patients affected by these pelvic tumors.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiología , Neoplasias Pélvicas/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/fisiopatología , Humanos , México/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pélvicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pélvicas/patología , Prevalencia , Traumatismos por Radiación/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/fisiopatología
3.
Rev Invest Clin ; 70(3): 117-120, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29943775

RESUMEN

Cancer patients are particularly susceptible to undernourishment so associated weight loss is frequent. Approximately 15% of patients lose >10% of their usual body weight, 40-80% become undernourished, and about 20% die as a result. Well-nourished patients have a higher survival rate when compared with patients at risk of undernourishment (19.9 vs. 3.7 months); hence, nutritional intervention is pivotal. Undernourishment negatively influences the patient's prognosis, and its prevalence depends on the tumor type and location, disease stage, treatment, and the applied nutritional evaluation tool. During abdominopelvic radiotherapy, up to 90% of patients experience symptoms of varying severity; weight loss during radiotherapy is an early indicator of nutritional deterioration, and he the use of radiation is associated with a higher likelihood of undernourishment. In patients with gynecological malignancies, 12.5-54% are malnourished before receiving oncological treatment, worsening after treatment in 35.8-82% of cases. There is also deterioration of the nutritional status in patients with colorectal cancer once pelvic radiotherapy is initiated, whereby 50% of cases are malnourished at the beginning of treatment, and 66.7% are so when it ends. Although there are notable differences in the impact of radiotherapy on weight according to the radiated region, 88% patients receiving abdominal radiotherapy were found to lose weight compared to 38% of patients whose treatment was limited to the pelvis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Abdominales/complicaciones , Estado Nutricional , Neoplasias Pélvicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Abdominales/terapia , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Humanos , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Desnutrición/etiología , Apoyo Nutricional/métodos , Neoplasias Pélvicas/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Pérdida de Peso
4.
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec ; 78(6): 320-333, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28125819

RESUMEN

We review clinical trials of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) to address the current and potential uses of cetuximab (CTX). PubMed was reviewed to identify papers published between 2010 and 2016. The search terms used were "cetuximab" and "head and neck cancer." A total of 634 articles were identified. Phase II or III studies with CTX in patients with advanced SCCHN without treatment or with recurrent/metastatic tumors were selected. Forty-six registries were obtained. Information was critically reviewed and relevant information presented. As definitive treatment of advanced squamous cells carcinomas and as palliative treatment of recurrent/metastatic disease, CTX alone or associated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy is an alternative to chemoradiotherapy because of its distinct and favorable toxicity profile.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello
5.
Rev Invest Clin ; 65 Suppl 1: S5-84, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24459776

RESUMEN

Mexican specialists in oncology, oncologic surgery, thoracic surgery, pneumology, pathology, molecular biology, anesthesiology, algology, psychology, nutrition, and rehabilitation (all of them experts in lung cancer treatment) in order to develop the National Consensus on Lung Cancer. The consensus has been developed as an answer to the need of updated Mexican guidelines for the optimal treatment of the disease, as well as to the requirements that such guidelines be established by multidisciplinary panel, depicting the current attention given to cancer lung cases in Mexico. Thus, this paper analyses the epidemiological review, screening, diagnosis, staging, pathology, translational medicine, and the suitable therapies for early, locally advanced, and metastatic disease in the first, second, and third lines of management, as well as rehabilitation and palliative measures.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Algoritmos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/etiología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/secundario , Árboles de Decisión , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , México , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Fumar/efectos adversos
6.
ISRN Oncol ; 2011: 526384, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22091420

RESUMEN

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is generally considered a lethal disease, with a poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has emerged as a new approach for peritoneal surface disease. This study investigated the early experience with this combined modality treatment at a single institute. From January 2007 to March 2010, 24 patients were treated After aggressive CS, with HIPEC (cisplatin 25 mg/m(2)/L and mitomycin C 3.3 mg/m(2)/L was administered for 90-minutes at 40.5° C). These data suggest that aggressive CRS with HIPEC for the treatment of PC may result in low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Rigorous patient selection, appropriate and prudent operative procedures were associated with encouraging results in our experience.

7.
Rev Invest Clin ; 63(6): 665-702, 2011.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23650680

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the third most common gynecologic malignancy worldwide. Most of cases it is of epithelial origin. At the present time there is not a standardized screening method, which makes difficult the early diagnosis. The 5-year survival is 90% for early stages, however most cases present at advanced stages, which have a 5-year survival of only 5-20%. GICOM collaborative group, under the auspice of different institutions, have made the following consensus in order to make recommendations for the diagnosis and management regarding to this neoplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following recommendations were made by independent professionals in the field of Gynecologic Oncology, questions and statements were based on a comprehensive and systematic review of literature. It took place in the context of a meeting of two days in which a debate was held. These statements are the conclusions reached by agreement of the participant members. RESULTS: No screening method is recommended at the time for the detection of early lesions of ovarian cancer in general population. Staging is surgical, according to FIGO. In regards to the pre-surgery evaluation of the patient, it is recommended to perform chest radiography and CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast. According to the histopathology of the tumor, in order to consider it as borderline, the minimum percentage of proliferative component must be 10% of tumor's surface. The recommended standardized treatment includes primary surgery for diagnosis, staging and cytoreduction, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy Surgery must be performed by an Oncologist Gynecologist or an Oncologist Surgeon because inadequate surgery performed by another specialist has been reported in 75% of cases. In regards to surgery it is recommended to perform total omentectomy since subclinic metastasis have been documented in 10-30% of all cases, and systematic limphadenectomy, necessary to be able to obtain an adequate surgical staging. Fertility-sparing surgery will be performed in certain cases, the procedure should include a detailed inspection of the contralateral ovary and also negative for malignancy omentum and ovary biopsy. Until now, laparoscopy for diagnostic-staging surgery is not well known as a recommended method. The recommended chemotherapy is based on platin and taxanes for 6 cycles, except in Stage IA, IB and grade 1, which have a good prognosis. In advanced stages, primary cytoreduction is recommended as initial treatment. Minimal invasion surgery is not a recommended procedure for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Radiotherapy can be used to palliate symptoms. Follow up of the patients every 2-4 months for 2 years, every 3-6 months for 3 years and anually after the 5th year is recommended. Evaluation of quality of life of the patient must be done periodically. CONCLUSIONS: In the present, there is not a standardized screening method. Diagnosis in early stages means a better survival. Standardized treatment includes primary surgery with the objective to perform an optimal cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy Treatment must be individualized according to each patient. Radiotherapy can be indicated to palliate symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Cuidados Posteriores , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Genes Relacionados con las Neoplasias , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias/normas , Síndromes Neoplásicos Hereditarios/genética , Epiplón/cirugía , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Ovariectomía/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos , Calidad de Vida , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Recuperativa , Taxoides/administración & dosificación
8.
Rev Invest Clin ; 62(6): 583, 585-605, 2010.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21416918

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the second most common gynecologic malignancy worldwide in the peri and postmenopausal period. Most often for the endometrioid variety. In early clinical stages long-term survival is greater than 80%, while in advanced stages it is less than 50%. In our country there is not a standard management between institutions. GICOM collaborative group under the auspice of different institutions have made the following consensus in order to make recommendations for the management of patients with this type of neoplasm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following recommendations were made by independent professionals in the field of Gynecologic Oncology, questions and statements were based on a comprehensive and systematic review of literature. It took place in the context of a meeting of four days in which a debate was held. These statements are the conclusions reached by agreement of the participant members. RESULTS: Screening should be performed women at high risk (diabetics, family history of inherited colon cancer, Lynch S. type II). Endometrial thickness in postmenopausal patients is best evaluated by transvaginal US, a thickness greater than or equal to 5 mm must be evaluated. Women taking tamoxifen should be monitored using this method. Abnormal bleeding in the usual main symptom, all post menopausal women with vaginal bleeding should be evaluated. Diagnosis is made by histerescopy-guided biopsy. Magnetic resonance is the best image method as preoperative evaluation. Frozen section evaluates histologic grade, myometrial invasion, cervical and adnexal involvement. Total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be performed except in endometrial histology grades 1 and 2, less than 50% invasion of the myometrium without evidence of disease out of the uterus. Omentectomy should be done in histologies other than endometriod. Surgery should be always performed by a Gynecologic Oncologist or Surgical Oncologist, laparoscopy is an alternative, especially in patients with hypertension and diabetes for being less morbid. Adjuvant treatment after surgery includes radiation therapy to the pelvis, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy. Patients with Stages III and IV should have surgery with intention to achieve optimal cytoreduction because of the impact on survival (51 m vs. 14 m), the treatment of recurrence can be with surgery depending on the pattern of relapse, systemic chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Follow-up of patients is basically clinical in a regular basis. CONCLUSIONS: Screening programme is only for high risk patients. Multidisciplinary treatment impacts on survival and local control of the disease, including surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy, hormonal treatment is reserved to selected cases of recurrence. This is the first attempt of a Mexican Collaborative Group in Gynecology to give recommendations is a special type of neoplasm.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma , Neoplasias Endometriales , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/epidemiología , Carcinoma/patología , Carcinoma/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Antagonistas de Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Tamizaje Masivo , México , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Factores de Riesgo , Terapia Recuperativa , Tamoxifeno/efectos adversos
9.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 10(12): 840-3, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19068456

RESUMEN

Male pseudohermaphroditism and androgen insensitivity syndrome cases have an increased risk of developing testicular cancer due to many factors such as mutations, hormonal disturbances involving gonadotropins and cryptorchidism. We describe the clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of two cases with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome and testicular cancer development, which were handled at the National Cancer Institute of Mexico.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Resistencia Androgénica/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Adulto , Síndrome de Resistencia Androgénica/complicaciones , Criptorquidismo/complicaciones , Trastornos del Desarrollo Sexual/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/complicaciones , Población , Neoplasias Testiculares/complicaciones
10.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 32(3): 180-90, 2006 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16483720

RESUMEN

The HER2 oncogene encodes a transmembrane protein partially homologous to epidermal growth factor receptor. This oncogene has been studied mainly in breast cancer where it has prognostic, predictive and therapeutic target value. The expression of HER2 in epithelial ovarian cancer has been less studied. HER2 expression can be determined through IHC, FISH, CISH and ELISA among other tests, with reported positivity frequencies of overexpression varying from 1.8% to 76%. In some studies HER2 overexpression has been associated with advanced stages, poorly differentiated tumors, resistance to chemotherapy and shortened survival. Although trastuzumab is able to produce a low response rate as a single agent in pretreated ovarian cancer patients with overexpression of HER2, its usefulness is limited due to the low frequency of strong expression. To date there is not enough bases for assessment and HER2-based therapies in epithelial ovarian cancer.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Carcinoma/metabolismo , Neoplasias Ováricas/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Animales , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma/química , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/terapia , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/química , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/análisis , Factores de Riesgo , Regulación hacia Arriba
11.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 6(5): 391-401, 2005 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16381622

RESUMEN

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer and the most common cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. However, the burden is not evenly distributed, and, according to the best available data, there are large variations in the incidence, mortality, and survival between different countries and regions and within specific regions. Many complex factors underlie these variations, including population structure (eg, age, race, and ethnicity), lifestyle, environment, socioeconomic status, risk factor prevalence, mammography use, disease stage at diagnosis, and access to high-quality care. We review recent breast cancer incidence and mortality statistics and explore why these vary so greatly across the world. Further research is needed to fully understand the reasons for variations in breast cancer outcomes. This will aid the development of tailored strategies to improve outcomes in general as well as the standard of care for underserved populations and reduce the burden of breast cancer worldwide.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , África/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Américas/epidemiología , Asia/epidemiología , Australia/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Canadá/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , México/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Rev Invest Clin ; 55(5): 502-6, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14968470

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Primary lymphoma of bone (PLB) is a rare clinical-pathological entity representing less than 1% of all lymphomas. This work was aimed to review the presentation characteristics of PLB at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología including its management and evolution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty cases of lymphoma of bone were diagnosed between 1972 and 1999 from a database including 577 patients with lymphoma. Among them, only 8 patients (1.36% of the total lymphomas) met the criteria set out to be diagnosed as primary lymphoma of bone, stage IE. In all patients, diagnosis was histopathologically made through open biopsy, and they were classified in accordance with the former criteria of the Working Formulation (WF). This review applied the current criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO). RESULTS: Three women and five men with a mean age of 40 years (range 20-65) were identified. Mean physical performance (Karnofsky) was 80%. Six patients presented clinically evident disease of the affected region. The most frequent symptom was pain at the site of the lesion in 3 patients, being the cardinal symptom in 1 patient. Histological diagnosis was diffuse large cell lymphoma, and B immunophenotype was confirmed in 5 patients. Five patients received sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy; 1 patient received chemotherapy; and 2 patients received exclusive radiotherapy. The chemotherapy regimes were based on anthracyclines. Five patients presented complete response and 3 patients showed progressive disease. One patient showing complete response relapse 16 years after the treatment. The mean follow-up in this series was 60 months (range 3-190 months). Tumor localization and functional condition of the patient were the best prognostic factors. Surgery was not therapeutic in any case. CONCLUSIONS: PLB still remains a rare clinical-pathological entity, and represented 1.3% of total lymphomas in this series. Sequential anthracycline-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the most important therapeutic choices. Functional condition of patients at diagnosis and tumor localization were the most accurate prognostic factors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Linfoma , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Linfoma/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico
13.
Rev. Inst. Nac. Cancerol. (Méx.) ; 46(4): 242-246, oct.-dic. 2000. tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-302957

RESUMEN

El vómito y la náusea inducida por agentes citotóxicos frecuentemente limita la utilización de agentes efectivos pero emetizantes como el cisplatino. Este fue un estudio comparativo de Granisetron versus metoclopramida más dexametasona que evaluó la eficacia y efectos colaterales en las primeras 24 horas en ambos grupos. Se incluyeron 40 pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer candidatos a recibir cisplatino a una dosis mayor de 49 mg/m2 con hoja de consentimiento informado. Se excluyeron pacientes que hubieran tenido náusea o vómito previo al tratamiento. Se administró Granisetron 40 m g/kg diluido en 20 mL de la solución salina para infusión intravenosa de cinco minutos previo a cisplatino en un grupo y en el otro se administró dexametasona 12 mg diluidos en 50 mL de solución salina para infusión de 30 minutos y metoclopramida 3 mg/kg I.V. en 30 minutos seguido de 4 mg/kg en infusión intravenosa para 8 hrs. Se consideró respuesta completa cuando los pacientes no tuvieron vómito ni náusea o sólo náusea leve. Hubo veintiún pacientes en el grupo de Granisetron y 19 en el grupo de tratamiento estándar. Obtuvimos respuesta completa (RC) del 66.6 por ciento en el grupo de Granisetron vs 73.68 por ciento en el grupo control, se presentó 20 por ciento de extrapiramidalismo de intensidad moderada en el grupo control (p=0.89), mientras que sólo el 9.5 por ciento del grupo de Granisetron presentó cefalea. Granisetron fue tan eficaz como la combinación con metoclopramida con la ventaja de tener muy pocos efectos adversos.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cisplatino , Dexametasona , Granisetrón , Metoclopramida , Antieméticos/farmacología
14.
Arch. med. res ; Arch. med. res;30(3): 212-5, mayo-jun. 1999. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-256650

RESUMEN

Background. Oral etoposide administration is a suitable alternative to the intravenous route; therefore, commercial capsules have been developed. Before these capsules were available in Mexico, we studied drug bioavailability after oral administration of the intravenous etoposide solution (IVES). Methods. Eight adult cancer patients received a 50-mg oral etoposide dose as IVES and blood samples were collected over a period of 24 h. plasma etoposide concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, plasma concentration against time curves were constructed, and biovailability parameters were calculated. Results. Oral IVES yielded an adequate bioavailability profile because Cmax was 2.38 ñ 0.30 µg/mL, AUC was 12.87 ñ 2.02 µg/mL and half-life was 6.72 ñ 0.97 h. Conclusions. Considering that the pharmacokinetic aim is to maintain plasm concentrations between 0.5 and 1.0 µg/mL for several hours while avioding high concentrations, i.e., of 10 µg/mL or higher, oral administration of 50-mg etoposide as IVES appears to be a suitable dosing option. In addition, oral IVES is considerably less expensive than intravenous administration in terms of both drug presentation and administration


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/farmacocinética , Economía Farmacéutica , Etopósido/farmacocinética , Etopósido/uso terapéutico , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Administración Oral , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Soluciones
15.
Rev. Inst. Nac. Cancerol. (Méx.) ; 44(1): 9-14, ene.-mar. 1998. tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-241370

RESUMEN

Con el objeto de identificar factores pronósticos de respuesta clínica completa en carcinoma epidermoide de cabeza y cuello localmente avanzado, se analziaron retrospectivamente los registros de 72 pacientess tratados en el periodo comprendido de enero de 1986 a diciembre de 1994 con quimioterapia neoadyuvante, utilizando el esquema de 5 FU-cisplatino. Se observó que en los pacientes con cuello clínicamente negativo a metástasis ganglionares y con tumores bien diferenciados fue posible obtener un mayor índice de respuestas clínicas mayores al 50 por ciento después del primer ciclo de quimioterapia. Los pacientes que respondieron a la quimioterapia neoadyuvante también tuvieron mejor respuesta a radioterapia. Concluimos que aquellos pacientes con respuesta parcial después del primer ciclo de quimioterapia deben completar tres ciclos de quimioterapia, ya que esto incrementa los porcentajes de casos con respuesta completa, hecho que mejoran la supervivencia y aumenta la probabilidad de conservar el órgano en donde se origina el tumor, conclusión no validada previamente. Por el contrario, en los casos con porcentajes menores de respuesta posterior al primer ciclo, deberán ser aplicados a otros esquemas de tratamiento con el objeto de ofrecer mejores resultados de los ya conocidos


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA