RESUMEN
The absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) inflammasome has been demonstrated as involved in tumor growth. In this study we used human samples of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, taking advantage of a mouse model of smoking cessation. Human samples were stratified according to the smoking status, high-risk factor for this type of tumor. Both public transcriptomic and human samples obtained by a clinical trial proved that AIM2 was upregulated either in terms of mRNA or protein, respectively, in the tumor mass according to the TNM stage, but it did not relate to the smoking status, age and sex. The upregulation of AIM2 was correlated to an immunosuppressive environment according to resting/non-active dendritic cells (DCs) and T regulatory cells, as demonstrated in both human samples and by means of an experimental model of smoking mice. Computational analysis showed that AIM2 upregulation was correlated to both an inflammasome profile, responsible for the poor prognosis of non-smoker and smoker LUAD patients, and to a non-inflammasome profile for former smoker. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that AIM2 is involved in lung carcinogenesis either in a canonical and non-canonical manner due to an immunosuppressive microenvironment associated to a dismal prognosis of LUAD patients.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Melanoma , Humanos , Ratones , Animales , Inflamasomas/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/genética , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Microambiente Tumoral , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A biweekly regimen of irinotecan 200 mg/m2 on day 1 and levo-leucovorin (LV) 250 mg/m2 plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 850 mg/m2 via intravenous bolus on day 2 was assessed in 2 consecutive randomized trials in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual data of 254 patients were merged, and baseline features potentially affecting overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and occurrence of severe toxicity were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In the pooled series, ORR was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27%-39%). Liver-only disease (47% vs. 25%; P=0.0012) and absence of previous weight loss (38% vs. 20%; P=0.0189) were significantly associated with a higher ORR on the multivariate analysis. Absence of weight loss (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02-1.93; P=0.0377) was significantly associated with a longer PFS (7.5 months vs. 6 months). Median OS was 15.1 months (95% CI, 13.5-16.6 months). Primary surgery, good performance status (PS), only one metastatic site, and oxaliplatin-based second-line treatment independently predicted a longer OS. Grade 4 neutropenia was significantly associated with a PS>or=1, whereas risk of grade>or=3 diarrhea was directly related to age and previous weight loss. CONCLUSION: Patients with no weight loss and/or preserved PS and with a limited disease extent appeared to obtain the greatest benefit from our irinotecan/5-FU/LV regimen, with acceptable toxicity. Notably, the regimen was effective and well tolerated by elderly patients. This regimen may represent the rationale for assessing the addition of novel antiangiogenic drugs to the treatment of metastatic CRC.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Irinotecán , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cisplatin (CDDP) is among the most active single agents against squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), and it is still the reference drug in the induction chemotherapy setting, when used in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Raltitrexed has been shown to be devoid of clinical activity against SCCHN when used alone; however, both preclinical and early clinical data regarding the combination raltitrexed-CDDP hold promise. Thymidylate synthase is the target enzyme of both raltitrexed and 5-FU; however, the two drugs have distinct sites of action on the enzyme and the combination of the two agents may be synergistic. We have previously shown that the combination of raltitrexed, levofolinic acid (LFA) and 5-FU has clinical activity against SCCHN; in a subsequent phase I study, cisplatin was added, and the combination of CDDP plus raltitrexed on day 1, followed by LFA and 5-FU on day 2, was judged feasible and active, since a 67% response rate was shown across all dose levels, with a 100% response rate at the recommended dose for phase II. METHODS: Patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN, not pretreated with chemo- or radiotherapy were randomized to receive either CDDP 60 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 2.5 mg/m2 on day 1 and LFA 250 mg/m2 and 5-FU 900 mg/m2 on day 2 (arm A) or CDDP 65 mg/m2 and methotrexate 500 mg/m2 on day 1, and LFA 250 mg/m2 and 5-FU 800 mg/m2 on day 2 (arm B). Both treatments were repeated every 2 weeks. Evaluation for tumor response was performed after four cycles. According to Simon two-stage design, with a target complete response (CR) rate (p1) of 35%, at least 7 CR among the first 31 treated patients and 16 CR among the final sample size of 52 patients were required. RESULTS: An interim analysis was performed when 36 patients were evaluable in each arm. In arm A, 10 CR (28%) and 19 partial responses (PR) (53%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 81%. In arm B, 3 CR (8%) and 12 PR (34%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 42%. The difference in both CR and overall response rate between the two arms was statistically significant (p = 0.03 and <0.001, respectively). Therefore, the accrual was stopped in arm B and continued only in arm A. Overall, 13 CR (21%) and 34 PR (56%) were observed among the 61 patients who were accrued in arm A, for an overall response rate of 77% (95% confidence interval 64-87%). Neutropenia was the main side effect in both arms (grade 3-4 in 45 and 23 patients in arm A and B, respectively). Extrahematologic toxicity was mild in both arms; however, 2 patients in arm B died due to toxicity (grade 4 mucositis in one case, grade 4 renal toxicity in the other). CONCLUSIONS: Although response data for our experimental treatment look encouraging, the hypothesis of a 35% activity, expressed as capability to induce a CR, cannot be accepted. The results obtained in this study are not substantially different from those of other trials of CDDP-5-FU-based regimens, and our combination is unlikely to represent a major breakthrough when used in this setting.