RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The value of simulation in medical education is increasingly obvious. Nevertheless, the high cost of running a simulation center and the time's availability for students to get to simulation center remain a major problem. Technological developments and miniaturization of computer systems now allow handling of simulation manikins. Therefore, "in situ" simulation seems a valuable alternative to center simulation. OBJECTIVE(S): To identify the costs and feasibility of "in situ" simulation. To conduct an evaluation of the sessions by participants in order to adapt the educational objectives. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: 118 "in situ" simulation sessions were organized between March 2011 and February 2013 in the university hospital of Université Catholique de Louvain. Sessions took place in OR facilities. At the end of each session, a questionnaire was given to each participant. PARTICIPANTS: 357 of 368 participants completed a questionnaire. For each session, one or two nurses and 2 residents in anesthesia were invited. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total costs for organizing the sessions. Number of realized sessions. Global satisfaction of participants. RESULTS: Total cost for organizing the sessions is 18 414 Euro. One hundred and one among the 118 scheduled sessions were performed, which corresponds to a rate of 85%. Three hundred and sixty-five people participated in training simulations. During the sessions, 357 questionnaires were completed. The global satisfaction was high with a median Likert scale of 5 (5-5) to the question "I would like to participate in other sessions in the future". CONCLUSION: The "in situ" simulation in anesthesia is feasible in a university hospital using the available facilities of the operating theater during the working hours of both participants and trainers. However, the number of annual sessions may be limited by the availability of the simulation room or staff.
Asunto(s)
Anestesiología/educación , Simulación por Computador , Instrucción por Computador , Internado y Residencia , Simulación por Computador/economía , Instrucción por Computador/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Maniquíes , Satisfacción Personal , Estudios Prospectivos , EnseñanzaRESUMEN
In this prospective study, the postoperative analgesic effects of intraoperative iv clonidine were evaluated. Two hundred consecutive patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to either balanced anaesthesia with iv clonidine (Group 1) or balanced anaesthesia alone (Group 2). A PCA infuser was connected immediately after tracheal extubation. It was programmed to deliver morphine "on demand" iv boluses at doses of 1 mg for patients greater than 65 yr and 1.5 mg for women or 2 mg for men less than 65 yr old. A blinded observer assessed postoperative analgesia by recording the analgesic demands (both met and unmet), patient pain scores, sedation scores, and any side effects during the first 36 hr after surgery. Intraoperative clonidine reduced the number of analgesic demands during the observation period (45 +/- 27 demands in Group 1 vs 81 +/- 60 in Group 2, P = 0.0001). This resulted in a reduction in morphine delivered (55.4 +/- 30.6 mg vs 67.1 +/- 45.1 mg, P less than 0.05), mainly during the first 12 hr (19.7 +/- 11.1 mg vs 27.6 +/- 18.1, mg P less than 0.001) and the unmet demand rate was also reduced at all time intervals (P less than 0.01). Clonidine did not exacerbate sedation or side effects. However, clonidine provided better analgesia in men and in patients less than 65 yr of age. Intraoperative iv clonidine enhances morphine analgesia after abdominal surgery.