RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal dosing strategy for infliximab in steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is unknown. We compared intensified and standard dose infliximab rescue strategies and explored maintenance therapies following infliximab induction in ASUC. METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, patients aged 18 years or older from 13 Australian tertiary hospitals with intravenous steroid-refractory ASUC were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab or 5 mg/kg infliximab (randomisation 1). Block randomisation was used and stratified by history of thiopurine exposure and study site, with allocation concealment maintained via computer-generated randomisation. Patients in the 10 mg/kg group (intensified induction strategy [IIS]) received a second dose at day 7 or earlier at the time of non-response; all patients in the 5 mg/kg group were re-randomised between day 3 and day 7 (1:1; randomisation 2) to a standard induction strategy (SIS) or accelerated induction strategy (AIS), resulting in three induction groups. Patients in the SIS group received 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6, with an extra 5 mg/kg dose between day 3 and day 7 if no response. Patients in the AIS group received 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 1, and 3, with the week 1 dose increased to 10 mg/kg and given between day 3 and day 7 if no response. The primary outcome was clinical response by day 7 (reduction in Lichtiger score to <10 with a decrease of ≥3 points from baseline, improvement in rectal bleeding, and decreased stool frequency to ≤4 per day). Secondary endpoints assessed outcomes to day 7 and exploratory outcomes compared induction regimens until month 3. From month 3, maintenance therapy was selected based on treatment experience, with use of thiopurine monotherapy, combination infliximab and thiopurine, or infliximab monotherapy, with follow-up as a cohort study up to month 12. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02770040, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between July 20, 2016, and Sept 24, 2021, 138 patients were randomly assigned (63 [46%] female and 75 [54%] male); 46 received a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab and 92 received 5 mg/kg infliximab. After randomisation 1, we observed no significant difference in the proportion of patients who had a clinical response by day 7 between the 10 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg groups (30 [65%] of 46 vs 56 [61%] of 92, p=0·62; risk ratio adjusted for thiopurine treatment history, 1·06 [95% CI 0·94-1·20], p=0·32). We found no significant differences in secondary endpoints including time to clinical response or change in Lichtiger score from baseline to day 7. Two patients who received 10 mg/kg infliximab underwent colectomy in the first 7 days compared with no patients in the 5 mg/kg group (p=0·21). Three serious adverse events occurred in three patients in both the 10 mg/kg group and 5 mg/kg group. After randomisation 2, the proportions of patients with clinical response at day 14 (34 [74%] of 46 in the IIS group, 35 [73%] of 48 in the AIS group, and 30 [68%] of 44 in the SIS group, p=0·81), clinical remission at month 3 (23 [50%], 25 [52%], 21 [48%], p=0·92), steroid-free remission at month 3 (19 [41%], 20 [42%], 18 [41%], p=1·0), endoscopic remission at month 3 (21 [46%], 22 [46%], 21 [48%], p=0·98), and colectomy at month 3 (three [7%] of 45, nine [19%] of 47, five [12%] of 43, p=0·20) were not significantly different between groups. Between day 8 and month 3, the proportion of patients with at least one infectious adverse event possibly related to infliximab was two (4%) of 46 in the IIS group, eight (17%) of 48 in the AIS group, and eight (18%) of 44 in the SIS group (p=0·082). No deaths occurred in the study. INTERPRETATION: Infliximab is a safe and effective rescue therapy in ASUC. In steroid-refractory ASUC, a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab was not superior to 5 mg/kg infliximab in achieving clinical response by day 7. Intensified, accelerated, and standard induction regimens did not result in a significant difference in clinical response by day 14 or in remission or colectomy rates by month 3. FUNDING: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, Gastroenterology Society of Australia, Gandel Philanthropy, Australian Postgraduate Award, Janssen-Cilag.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Thiopurine co-therapy with anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) agents is associated with higher anti-TNFα drug levels and reduced immunogenicity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the association between 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) and anti-TNFα levels and the optimal 6-TGN threshold level associated with higher anti-TNFα levels in combination therapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional multicentre study of patients with IBD on combination anti-TNFα and thiopurine maintenance therapy between January 2015 and August 2021. Primary outcomes were infliximab and adalimumab levels. Secondary outcomes were antibodies to infliximab (ATI) or adalimumab (ATA). Univariable and multivariable linear regression were performed to identify variables associated with anti-TNFα levels. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to define the optimal 6-TGN cut-off levels associated with therapeutic anti-TNFα levels. RESULTS: The study included 743 paired 6-TGN and anti-TNFα levels (640 infliximab and 103 adalimumab). 6-TGN levels were associated with infliximab levels, but not adalimumab levels, on univariable and multivariable regression. The optimal 6-TGN cut-off associated with therapeutic infliximab levels (≥5 mcg/mL) was 261 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cell (RBC) (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.57) for standard infliximab dosing and 227.5 pmol/8 × 108 RBC (AUC = 0.58) for escalated dosing. For therapeutic adalimumab levels (≥7.5 mcg/mL), the 6-TGN cut-off was 218.5 pmol/8 × 108 RBC (AUC = 0.59) for standard adalimumab dosing and 237.5 pmol/8 × 108 RBC (AUC = 0.63) for escalated dosing. CONCLUSION: 6-TGN levels were weakly associated with infliximab but not adalimumab levels in combination therapy. 6-TGN levels in the lower end of the therapeutic range (230-260 pmol/8 × 108 RBC) may be adequate to maintain higher infliximab levels, particularly with escalated infliximab dosing.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal infliximab dose intensification strategy to address loss of response associated with subtherapeutic infliximab trough levels remains uncertain, as does whether post-intensification trough and treatment targets should influence this decision. OBJECTIVES: This pharmacokinetic simulation study aimed to identify infliximab dose intensification strategies capable of achieving post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with clinical and objective treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. METHODS: A validated pharmacokinetic infliximab model, applied to 200 simulated patients, identified those with subtherapeutic (< 3.00 mg/L) trough levels after 30 weeks of standard (5 mg/kg 8-weekly) dosing, and subsequently applied 10 dose intensification strategies over a further 32 weeks. The proportion of simulations achieving 32-week post-intensification infliximab trough levels associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis > 7.50 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 9.70 mg/L) was the primary outcome, with perianal fistula healing (Crohn's disease > 10.10 mg/L) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis > 3.70 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 7.00mg/L) evaluated as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were stratified by intensity of dose intensification, with standard (≤ 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) and intensive (> 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) dosing strategies defined, respectively. RESULTS: The median pre-intensification infliximab trough level was 0.91 mg/L (interquartile range 1.37). Intensive dosing strategies were more likely to achieve infliximab trough concentrations associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis 36.48% vs. 10.80%, Crohn's disease 25.98 vs. 4.68%), perianal fistula healing (24.52% vs. 4.36%) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis 61.90% vs. 34.86%, Crohn's disease 40.32 vs. 12.08%) than standard intensification strategies (all p < 0.01). When controlling for cumulative (mg/kg) infliximab dose over 32 weeks, strategies that concurrently dose increased and interval shortened achieved the highest infliximab trough levels (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This simulation-based analysis highlights the potential of using post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with aspirational treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis to guide choice of infliximab dose intensification strategy. Intensive dose intensification strategies, particularly those that concurrently dose increase and interval shorten, appear to achieve higher infliximab levels than standard dose intensification strategies. This may be particularly important in the pursuit of stringent endpoints, such as endoscopic remission and fistula healing, which have been consistently associated with higher infliximab trough levels. These findings require validation across real-world cohorts.

Asunto(s)

Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedad de Crohn , Infliximab , Infliximab/farmacocinética , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/farmacocinética , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Simulación por Computador , Adulto , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Femenino , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico

RESUMEN

The World Health Organization has recommended that the management of chronic diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) should be undertaken using an integrated approach delivered by a multidisciplinary team. Although the composition of an IBD multidisciplinary team has been well described, the inclusion of an IBD pharmacist as a core member has been more recent, with variable uptake within IBD services internationally. While pharmacists continue to play the traditional role of safe prescribing and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, their role within the IBD team is rapidly expanding; however, the value, in terms of both clinical outcomes as well as financial savings (where available), which they add to IBD services has been less well described. In this narrative review, we perform a comprehensive evaluation of the literature detailing the expanding roles that IBD pharmacists play and describe opportunities that exist for integrated pharmacists to add value to IBD service delivery. Medication and adherence counseling, immunosuppressive monitoring, uptake of biosimilars, therapeutic drug monitoring, health promotion and prevention appear to be key areas where integrated pharmacists can add the most value to IBD patients and services. In particular, integrated IBD pharmacists can improve patient outcomes via rigorous monitoring pre and post initiation of drug therapies; focused medication counseling; advice on improving adherence; implementation of novel approaches to medication usage, and; strategies to help sustain IBD service delivery. These data can be used to further build a case for those seeking to add pharmacists to their team/services. Future studies should focus on evaluating the impact of an integrated IBD pharmacist on quality-of-care delivery together with the clinical and financial value added to IBD services compared to services that lack an integrated IBD pharmacist role.

---

Integration of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pharmacists adds value to IBD services by improving immunosuppressive monitoring, increasing patients' understanding and adherence to drug regimens and contributing to sustainable delivery of quality care, via novel models of care and innovative approaches to drug therapy.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A substantial proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on intravenous infliximab require dose intensification. Accessing additional intravenous infliximab is labour-intensive and expensive, depending on insurance and pharmaceutical reimbursement. Observational data suggest that subcutaneous infliximab may offer a convenient and safe alternative to maintain disease remission in patients requiring dose-intensified infliximab. A prospective, controlled trial is required to confirm that subcutaneous infliximab is as effective as dose-intensified intravenous infliximab, to identify predictors of disease flare and to establish the role of subcutaneous infliximab therapeutic drug monitoring. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DISCUS-IBD trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label non-inferiority study comparing the rate of disease flares in participants randomised to continue dose-intensified intravenous infliximab to those switched to subcutaneous infliximab after 48 weeks. Participants are adult patients with IBD in sustained corticosteroid-free remission on any regimen of dose-intensified infliximab up to a maximum of 10 mg/kg 4-weekly intravenously. Participants allocated to intravenous infliximab will continue infliximab at the same dose-intensified regimen they were receiving at study enrolment. Subcutaneous infliximab dosing will be stratified by prior intravenous infliximab dosing. Clinical (Harvey-Bradshaw Index, partial Mayo score), biochemical (C reactive protein, faecal calprotectin), pharmacokinetic (drug-level±antidrug antibodies) and qualitative data are collected 12-weekly until study conclusion at week 48. 13 sites across Australia will participate in recruitment to reach a calculated sample size of 120 participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Multisite ethics approval was obtained from the Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) at The Alfred Hospital under a National Mutual Acceptance (NMA) agreement (HREC/90559/Alfred-2022; Local Reference: Project 618/22, version 1.6, 2 March 2023). Findings will be reported at national and international gastroenterology meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. DISCUS-IBD was prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) prior to commencing recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622001458729.

Asunto(s)

Fármacos Gastrointestinales , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Infliximab , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Administración Intravenosa , Australia , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/farmacocinética , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The impact of thiopurine de-escalation while on vedolizumab versus continuing thiopurine therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC) is unclear. We aimed to determine the effect of thiopurine withdrawal for patients with UC in remission on vedolizumab. METHODS: This multicenter randomized controlled trial recruited UC patients on vedolizumab 300 mg intravenously every 8 weeks and a thiopurine. Patients in steroid-free clinical remission for ≥6 months and endoscopic remission/improvement (Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1) were randomized 2:1 to withdraw or continue thiopurine. Primary outcome was comparing week 48 vedolizumab trough concentrations. Secondary outcomes were clinical relapse (partial Mayo score ≥3 and fecal calprotectin >150 µg/g or increase in Mayo endoscopic subscore ≥1 from baseline), fecal calprotectin remission (<150 µg/g), C-reactive protein remission (<5 mg/L), centrally read endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0), histologic remission (Nancy index = 0), histo-endoscopic remission, and adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 62 patients were randomized to continue (n = 20) or withdraw (n = 42) thiopurine. At week 48, vedolizumab trough concentrations were not significantly different between continue and withdrawal groups (14.7 µg/mL, interquartile rate [IQR], 12.3-18.5 µg/mL versus 15.9 µg/mL, IQR, 10.1-22.7 µg/mL, respectively, P = 0.36). The continue group had significantly higher fecal calprotectin remission (95.0%, 19/20 versus 71.4%, 30/42; P = .03), histologic remission (80.0%, 16/20 versus 48.6%, 18/37; P = .02), and histo-endoscopic remission (75.0%, 15/20 versus 32.4%, 12/37; P = .002) than the withdrawal group. Histologic activity (hazard ratio [HR], 15.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-146.5; P = .02) and prior anti-tumor necrosis factor exposure (HR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.3-33.8; P = .03) predicted clinical relapse after thiopurine withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Thiopurine withdrawal did not affect vedolizumab trough concentrations. However, it may increase fecal calprotectin, histologic, and histo-endoscopic activity. Histologic activity and prior anti-tumor necrosis factor exposure may predict disease relapse on thiopurine withdrawal for patients using vedolizumab for UC. Australian and New Zealand Trial Registry, number ACTRN12618000812291.

RESUMEN

Background/Aims: Robust management algorithms are required to reduce the residual risk of colectomy in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) refractory to standard infliximab salvage therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance and benefits of alternative ASUC management strategies using simulated prediction models of varying accuracy. Methods: This was a simulation-based modeling study using a hypothetical cohort of 5,000 steroid-refractory ASUC patients receiving standard infliximab induction. Simulated predictive models were used to risk-stratify patients and escalate treatment in patients at high risk of failing standard infliximab induction. The main outcome of interest was colectomy by 3 months. Results: The 3-month colectomy rate in the base scenario where all 5,000 patients received standard infliximab induction was 23%. The best-performing management strategy assigned high-risk patients to sequential Janus kinase inhibitor inhibition and mediumrisk patients to accelerated infliximab induction. Using a 90% area under the curve (AUC) prediction model and optimistic treatment efficacy assumptions, this strategy reduced the 3-month colectomy rate to 8% (65% residual risk reduction). Using an 80% AUC prediction model with only modest treatment efficacy assumptions, the 3-month colectomy rate was reduced to 15% (35% residual risk reduction). Overall management strategy efficacy was highly dependent on predictive model accuracy and underlying treatment efficacy assumptions. Conclusions: This is the first study to simulate predictive model-based management strategies in steroid-refractory ASUC and evaluate their effect on short-term colectomy rates. Future studies on predictive model development should incorporate simulation studies to better understand their expected benefit.

RESUMEN

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency that affects approximately 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis at some point in time in their lives. Outcomes of ASUC are highly variable. Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to corticosteroids and up to 50% of patients do not respond to rescue therapy (infliximab or cyclosporin) and require emergency colectomy. Data are emerging on infliximab dosing strategies, use of cyclosporin as a bridge to slower acting biologic agents and Janus kinase inhibition as primary and sequential therapy. In this review, we outline contemporary approaches to clinical management of ASUC in the setting of failure to respond to traditional rescue therapies.

RESUMEN

Pneumocystis jirovecii is a ubiquitous, unicellular fungus that can cause pneumonia (PJP) in immunosuppressed individuals. We report the first case of PJP complicating upadacitinib use for ulcerative colitis. This report is of clinical relevance given the widespread uptake of JAK inhibition.

Asunto(s)

Colangitis Esclerosante , Colitis Ulcerosa , Pneumocystis carinii , Neumonía por Pneumocystis , Humanos , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Neumonía por Pneumocystis/inducido químicamente , Neumonía por Pneumocystis/tratamiento farmacológico , Colangitis Esclerosante/complicaciones , Colangitis Esclerosante/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The management of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients with concurrent liver transplantation is challenging, and data regarding the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors with anti-rejection medications are required. We report the experience of all liver transplant recipients receiving tofacitinib and/or upadacitinib for IBD across three states in Australia. METHODS: All liver transplant recipients from the Australian states of Victoria, New South Wales, and Tasmania, who required tofacitinib or upadacitinib for the treatment of IBD, were identified using prospectively maintained liver transplant databases. Patients were followed up until medication cessation or last follow-up. Clinical safety and efficacy data were collected. RESULTS: Eight patients [median age 30 years] were included, seven of whom received first-line JAK inhibition with tofacitinib. All patients had failed one or more biologic therapies prior to commencing JAK inhibition, including six patients who had failed two or more agents. JAK inhibition was continued for a median of 17 months, with 143 patient-months of combined follow-up. The anti-rejection medication tacrolimus was prescribed in all patients. Overall, seven [88%] patients achieved clinical remission, including all three patients who were switched from tofacitinib to upadacitinib. One patient required colectomy after 1 month of treatment. There were no other cases of serious infection, venous thromboembolism, or major adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: As the largest case series to date, these data indicate that combining JAK inhibition with transplant anti-rejection medication may be a safe and clinically effective method of treating IBD in patients with prior biologic failure.

Asunto(s)

Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Trasplante de Hígado , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Tacrolimus/efectos adversos , Australia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/administración & dosificación

RESUMEN

Autophagy-related genes have been closely associated with intestinal homeostasis. BECLIN1 is a component of Class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complexes that orchestrate autophagy initiation and endocytic trafficking. Here we show intestinal epithelium-specific BECLIN1 deletion in adult mice leads to rapid fatal enteritis with compromised gut barrier integrity, highlighting its intrinsic critical role in gut maintenance. BECLIN1-deficient intestinal epithelial cells exhibit extensive apoptosis, impaired autophagy, and stressed endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. Remaining absorptive enterocytes and secretory cells display morphological abnormalities. Deletion of the autophagy regulator, ATG7, fails to elicit similar effects, suggesting additional novel autophagy-independent functions of BECLIN1 distinct from ATG7. Indeed, organoids derived from BECLIN1 KO mice show E-CADHERIN mislocalisation associated with abnormalities in the endocytic trafficking pathway. This provides a mechanism linking endocytic trafficking mediated by BECLIN1 and loss of intestinal barrier integrity. Our findings establish an indispensable role of BECLIN1 in maintaining mammalian intestinal homeostasis and uncover its involvement in endocytic trafficking in this process. Hence, this study has important implications for our understanding of intestinal pathophysiology.

Asunto(s)

Apoptosis , Células Epiteliales , Ratones , Animales , Beclina-1/genética , Beclina-1/metabolismo , Apoptosis/genética , Células Epiteliales/metabolismo , Autofagia/genética , Homeostasis , Mamíferos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The risk of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy [ICP] is increased in thiopurine-exposed pregnancies. Thiopurine 'shunting', with a 6-methylmercaptopurine [MMP] to 6-thioguanine [TGN] ratio of >11, progresses over pregnancy, and may promote ICP development. We aimed to explore the association between thiopurine exposure and ICP, including the hypothesised impact of thiopurine shunting, and identify risk minimisation strategies. METHODS: This prospective multicentre cohort study compared thiopurine and biologic monotherapy-exposed pregnant participants. Disease activity and obstetric outcome data, thiopurine metabolites, bile acids, and transaminases were obtained before conception, in each trimester, at delivery, and postpartum. Thiopurine dose management was at the discretion of the treating physician. RESULTS: Included were 131 thiopurine and 147 biologic monotherapy-exposed pregnancies. MMP/TGN ratio increased from preconception to third trimester [p <0.01], with approximately 25% of participants shunting in pregnancy. Second trimester split dosing led to a decrease in the median MMP/TGN ratio from 18 (interquartile range [IQR] 6-57) to 3 [IQR 2-3.5] at delivery [p = 0.04]. The risk of ICP was increased in thiopurine-exposed pregnancies (6.7% [7/105] vs 0% [0/112], p <0.001), with all ICP cases occurring in the setting of antenatal thiopurine shunting. Thiopurine dose increases (risk ratio [RR] 8.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.88-34.85, p = 0.005) and shunting in third trimester [6.20, 1.21-30.73, p = 0.028] and at delivery [14.18, 1.62-123.9, p = 0.016] were associated with an increased risk of ICP. CONCLUSIONS: Thiopurine exposure is associated with an increased risk of ICP, particularly following dose increases antenatally and with shunting in late pregnancy. The latter may be effectively managed with split dosing, although further studies are warranted.

Asunto(s)

Colestasis Intrahepática , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Mercaptopurina , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Colestasis Intrahepática/inducido químicamente , Estudios Prospectivos , Mercaptopurina/análogos & derivados , Mercaptopurina/administración & dosificación , Mercaptopurina/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Tioguanina/administración & dosificación , Tioguanina/efectos adversos , Azatioprina/efectos adversos , Azatioprina/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite reassuring clinical safety data, thrombocytosis, anemia, lymphopenia, and liver function derangements have been observed in infants born to women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with thiopurines and biologics. We aimed to define the prevalence, course, associations, and clinical impact of hematological and biochemical abnormalities in such infants. METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study assessed clinical, hematologic, and biochemical outcomes of infants exposed to thiopurines or biologics in utero for management of maternal IBD. Liver transaminases, full blood examination, and infant thiopurine metabolites (where exposed) were taken at delivery and 6 weeks of age. Abnormal results were repeated until normalization. Infants were followed clinically by a pediatric gastroenterologist up to 2 years of age. RESULTS: A total of 130 infants were included. Thrombocytosis and elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) were seen in over half of infants up to 6 months of age with no significant clinical impact. Elevated ALT was associated with increasing maternal C-reactive protein in second trimester, while thrombocytosis was associated with increasing maternal C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin in third trimester. Preceding infection and vaccination were associated with an increased risk of elevated alkaline phosphatase at 3 months. In those exposed to thiopurines, increasing maternal 6-methylmercaptopurine at delivery was associated with increased ALT to 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Infants born to women with IBD commonly developed thrombocytosis, elevated alkaline phosphatase, and elevated ALT. These findings were associated with exposure to maternal inflammation, elevated 6-methylmercaptopurine at delivery, and infant vaccinations and infections, and had minimal clinical consequence.

---

Hematological and biochemical abnormalities have been observed in infants born to women with inflammatory bowel disease. This prospective study shows that thrombocytosis and elevated alanine transaminase are common in infants to 6 months of age and are associated with maternal inflammation, rather than with in utero medication exposures.

RESUMEN

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a distinctive ulcerative colitis flare presentation characterised by the presence of systemic inflammation as well as bloody diarrhoea, and occurs at least once in 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their disease course. Each episode carries a risk of complications, need for colectomy, and mortality. Little is known about ASUC pathogenesis, although impaired host-microbiota crosstalk involving pathobionts is suspected. In this Review, we discuss unanswered questions and results from the latest research on the medical-first-line, second-line, and potential third-line therapies-and surgical management of ASUC. We detail promising options for management, such as the use of enteral nutrition in combination with intravenous steroids, the ability to predict early failure of first-line or second-line therapies, and the emerging role of JAK inhibitors. An optimal framework to personalise therapy on the basis of multiomics tools is yet to be developed.

Asunto(s)

Colitis Ulcerosa , Humanos , Colitis Ulcerosa/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Inflamación , Colectomía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is an immune-mediated, chronic cholestatic liver disease. Currently, liver transplantation is the only established life-saving treatment. Several studies have evaluated the effect of different biologic therapies on PSC with inconclusive findings. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of biologics in PSC and associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase were searched up to July 31, 2023, for studies reporting the effects of biologics in patients with PSC-IBD. Effects of biologic therapy on alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, ulcerative colitis response score, and adverse events were calculated and expressed as standardized difference of means (SMD), proportions, and 95% CI using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Six studies, including 411 PSC-IBD patients who received biologics, were included. Biologic treatment was associated with no change in alkaline phosphatase (SMD: 0.1, 95% CI: -0.07 -0.17, p=0.43), but a small and statistically significant increase in total bilirubin (SMD: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.05-0.35, p<0.01). 31.2% (95% CI: 23.8-39.7) of patients with IBD achieved endoscopic response, and there was a significant improvement in ulcerative colitis response score (SMD: -0.6,95% CI: -0.88 to 0.36, p<0.01). Furthermore, 17.6% (95% CI: 13.0-23.5) of patients experienced adverse events severe enough to discontinue therapy, and 29.9% (95% CI: 25.2-34.8) had a loss of response to biologics. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients with PSC-IBD with biologics (vedolizumab, infliximab, and adalimumab) was not associated with improvement of biochemical markers of cholestasis. Biologics are effective in treating the colitis associated with PSC. Vedolizumab was associated with worsening liver enzymes in contrast to other biologics, a finding that warrants further study.

Asunto(s)

Productos Biológicos , Colangitis Esclerosante , Colestasis , Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Fosfatasa Alcalina , Colangitis Esclerosante/complicaciones , Colangitis Esclerosante/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Bilirrubina , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Biologic drugs are highly effective for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management but are key drivers of costs of care especially when administered intravenously (i.v.). Availability of subcutaneous (SC) formulations has increased convenience for patients and improved access to care, but at the cost of revenue to health services. AIMS: To evaluate the economic impact of transitioning a tertiary centre IBD cohort from i.v. to SC biologic administration and assess the implications for key stakeholders. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who received i.v. infliximab or vedolizumab in the outpatient infusion centre of a tertiary IBD centre between July 2019 and June 2021 was undertaken. Data were collated from electronic medical records, pharmacy dispensing systems and the hospital business intelligence unit. An economic analysis and theoretical financial/capacity impact analysis of a transition to an SC model were estimated under two scenarios using a random 10% and 30% of the patient cohort. RESULTS: Transitioning our IBD cohort from i.v. to SC administration would result in a loss to our health service of AU$2 732 123.75, composed of AU$1 463 003.75 in Weighted Inlier Equivalent Separation (WIES) and AU$1 269 120 in drug procurement revenue. However, it would ease capacity in the infusion centre by up to 5256 h. CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning patients to SC administration results in improved access to infusion centres and substantial savings to state governments; however, switching results in a loss of i.v. biologic-generated WIES to health services. Alternative funding models are required to achieve sustainability in IBD care and reduce reliance on i.v. biologic-generated income.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Fármacos Gastrointestinales , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Infliximab , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/economía , Infliximab/economía , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/economía , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Administración Intravenosa , Infusiones Intravenosas

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We postulated that adalimumab [ADA] drug clearance [CL] may be a more critical determinant of therapeutic outcome than ADA concentration. This was tested in Crohn's disease [CD] patients undergoing ADA maintenance treatment. METHODS: CD patients from four cohorts received ADA induction and started maintenance therapy. Therapeutic outcomes consisted of endoscopic remission [ER], sustained C-reactive protein [CRP] based clinical remission [defined as CRP levels below 3 mg/L in the absence of symptoms], and faecal calprotectin [FC] level below 100 µg/g. Serum albumin, ADA concentration, and anti-drug antibody status were determined using immunochemistry and homogeneous mobility shift assay, respectively. CL was determined using a nonlinear mixed effect model with Bayesian priors. Statistical analysis consisted of Mann-Whitney test and logistic regression with calculation of odds ratio. Repeated event analysis was conducted using a nonlinear mixed effect model. RESULTS: In 237 enrolled patients [median age 40 years, 45% females], median CL was lower in patients achieving ER as compared with those with persistent active endoscopic disease [median 0.247 L/day vs 0.326 L/day, respectively] [p <0.01]. There was no significant difference in ADA concentration between patients in endoscopic remission compared with those with recurrence [median 9.3 µg/mL vs 11.7 µg/mL, respectively]. Sustained CRP-based clinical remission and FC levels below 100 µg/g were generally associated with lower CL and higher ADA concentration. Repeated event analysis confirmed those findings with better performances of CL than concentration in associating with ER and other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Lower ADA clearance is associated with an improved clinical outcome for patients with Crohn's disease and may be a superior pharmacokinetic measure than concentration.

Asunto(s)

Adalimumab , Enfermedad de Crohn , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos , Teorema de Bayes , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Inducción de Remisión , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Thiopurines are established treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet concerns remain regarding their safety. AIM: To evaluate the use of thiopurine-allopurinol combination therapy compared to standard thiopurine therapy in IBD. METHODS: We performed a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of thiopurine-allopurinol versus thiopurine with placebo for adults commencing a thiopurine for IBD. Patients had active disease at baseline; dosing of therapy was based on a pre-specified regimen and subsequent metabolites. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a composite of symptomatic disease activity remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index <5 for Crohn's disease, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index <4 for ulcerative colitis) and a faecal calprotectin <150 µg/g after 26 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The trial was terminated early due to slow recruitment. We randomised 102 participants (54 thiopurine-allopurinol, 48 thiopurine with placebo) with similar age (median 42 vs 48 years) and sex distribution (46% women per group). A higher proportion achieved the primary outcome in the thiopurine-allopurinol group (50% vs 35%, p = 0.14) and fewer participants stopped their allocated therapy due to adverse events (11% vs 29%, p = 0.02). Also, within the thiopurine-allopurinol group, thiopurine dose adjustments were less frequent (69% vs 92%, p = 0.03), a higher proportion achieved an early therapeutic 6-TGN level at week 6 (71% vs 53%, p = 0.19), and adverse events attributed to therapy were less frequent (15% vs 44%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Thiopurine-allopurinol therapy is safe and mitigates thiopurine adverse effects, thus enhancing tolerability without compromising efficacy (ACTRN12613001347752).

Asunto(s)

Azatioprina , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Purinas , Compuestos de Sulfhidrilo , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Azatioprina/efectos adversos , Alopurinol/efectos adversos , Mercaptopurina , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Quimioterapia Combinada , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/inducido químicamente , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency for which colectomy is required in patients who do not respond to rescue therapy. While previous studies have predominantly focused on predicting outcome to first-line corticosteroid therapy, there is a need to understand the factors associated with response to rescue therapies in order to improve clinical outcomes. We reviewed the evidence regarding factors associated with response to rescue therapy in adults with ASUC and identified future directions for research. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted, and 2 reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion. RESULTS: Of 3509 records screened, 101 completed studies were eligible for inclusion. We identified 42 clinical, hematological, biochemical, endoscopic, or pharmacological factors associated with response to rescue therapy. Older age (≥50 years), thiopurine experience, and cytomegalovirus or Clostridioides difficile infection were associated with a higher risk of nonresponse to rescue therapy. Biochemical factors associated with poorer response included an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥30mg/L on admission, hypoalbuminemia and an elevated ratio of CRP to albumin. Severe endoscopic findings, including a Mayo endoscopic score of 3 or Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity ≥5, portended poorer outcomes. The role of fecal calprotectin and therapeutic value of measuring infliximab drug levels in ASUC remain to be defined. CONCLUSIONS: Response to rescue therapy can be predicted by several specific factors, which would aid clinical decision-making. Existing and emerging factors should be integrated within predictive and prognostic models to help improve clinical outcomes.

---

In this review, we summarize the clinical, hematological, biochemical, radiological, endoscopic, and drug-related factors that predict or are associated with response to rescue therapy in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis. We also provide a clinical algorithm for clinicians.

RESUMEN

Acute severe colitis (ASUC) remains a significant cause of morbidity in up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their disease course. We present the outcomes out to 12 months following the use of high-dose tofacitinib, 10 mg three times daily (TDS), in patients with steroid and infliximab refractory ASUC. A total of 11 patients with ASUC who were treated with high-dose tofacitinib after failing sequential infliximab therapy between 2019 and 2021 were identified at an Australian tertiary centre. Ten of 11 patients demonstrated clinical and biochemical response to treatment during admission. Two of 11 patients required colectomy, one during the index admission and the other during re-admission 10 days after the index presentation. Nine of the initial responders had a median Mayo score of 1 (IQR 0-4) at both 6 and 12 months, and all remained colectomy-free out to 12 months. Neither venous thromboembolic events nor major infective complications were observed. Tofacitinib may be a safe and effective induction and maintenance agent in the treatment of steroid and infliximab refractory ASUC. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required to explore the use of tofacitinib in ASUC before it can be routinely recommended as salvage therapy.

Asunto(s)

Colitis Ulcerosa , Humanos , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Australia