Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Urol ; 54(3): 647-56, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18155824

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence and characteristics of anastomotic strictures (AS) after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with bladder-neck preservation (BNP), the efficacy of management with cold-knife incision (CKI), and its impact on urinary continence. METHODS: Seven hundred five consecutive patients who underwent RRP with BNP were prospectively followed with uroflowmetry at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and investigated for urinary incontinence with the 1-h pad test at AS diagnosis obtained with urethroscopy. If the instrument could not dilate the stricture, CKI was subsequently performed. Follow-up after treatment was performed with uroflowmetry and 1-h pad test at months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12. Recurrent AS was always treated with repeated CKI. RESULTS: Six hundred forty-eight patients were assessable. After a median time of 3.8 mo from RRP, 46 (7.1%) patients developed AS. Urinary incontinence was present in 21 (46%) men at AS diagnosis. Three (7%) patients were successfully managed by urethroscopic dilation only, whereas 43 (93%) required CKI. Eleven (26%) of the latter had recurrent AS. After a median follow-up of 48 mo from the last AS treatment, all patients are stricture-free, de novo urinary incontinence was never documented, and of the 21 originally incontinent men, 11 became continent, 8 improved and 2 remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, BNP does not decrease the incidence of AS after RRP; however, AS can be effectively managed with repeated CKI with a final 100% success rate. CKI has a possible positive impact on urinary continence in 90% of patients, without causing de novo incontinence.


Asunto(s)
Constricción Patológica/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Prostatectomía/métodos , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Constricción Patológica/epidemiología , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Urodinámica
2.
Scand J Urol Nephrol ; 38(1): 32-7, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15204424

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience of the influence of bladder neck preservation on patient continence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Radical retropubic prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation was performed in 131 patients (age range 48-73 years; mean 64.5 years). Urinary continence was evaluated using a validated questionnaire at follow-up visits and telephone interviews. All patients reporting incontinence were studied using a pad test and urodynamics. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up period of 21.7 months (range 4-47 months), 115 patients were continent (87%) and 16 incontinent. According to the International Continence Society criteria, three had severe, three moderate and 10 mild incontinence. Urodynamics revealed sphincter deficiency in 15 cases, which was associated with decreased bladder compliance in four, while decreased compliance was the only abnormality in one. Continence was recovered 0-27 months after surgery (mean 3.2 months): 40% of men were continent within the first month and 74% within the third. Histopathology revealed positive margins in 30/131 patients (22%), but exclusively at the bladder neck level in only seven (5%), and two also had positive nodes. Six patients (4.5%) presented bladder neck stenosis requiring transurethral incision. No statistically significant differences were found between the ages of continent and incontinent men or between the time to continence recovery with two different techniques of retropubic hemostasis; however, use of a nerve-sparing technique significantly reduced the time to continence recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy does not improve the long-term results of urinary continence but does contribute substantially to its earlier recovery, thus improving the quality of life. With proper patient selection the risk of positive margins at the bladder neck level only is reasonably low.


Asunto(s)
Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria/prevención & control , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Probabilidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Medición de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Urodinámica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA