RESUMEN
Several experiments have shown that smooth pursuit and saccades interact while tracking an object moving across the visual scene. It was proposed two decades ago that the amplitude of saccades triggered during smooth pursuit ('catch-up saccades') were corrected by a delayed sensory signal to account for the ongoing target displacement during catch-up saccades. However, recent studies used targets with non-constant velocity profiles and suggested that the correction of catch-up saccade amplitude must be done through an internal model of target motion. It is widely accepted that an internal model of target motion is also used by the central nervous system (CNS) to cancel inherent delays between visual input and smooth pursuit motor output, ensuring accurate tracking of moving targets. Our study proposes a new paradigm in which the target switches unexpectedly from one target with a non-constant periodic velocity profile to another with a non-constant aperiodic velocity profile. Our results confirm the hypothesis that the CNS uses an internal model of target motion to correct catch-up saccade amplitude. In addition, we reconcile the sensory delayed and the internal model of target motion hypotheses and show that a common internal model of target motion is shared within the CNS to control smooth pursuit and to correct catch-up saccade amplitude.
Asunto(s)
Sistema Nervioso Central/fisiología , Percepción de Movimiento/fisiología , Movimiento (Física) , Estimulación Luminosa , Seguimiento Ocular Uniforme/fisiología , Humanos , Movimientos SacádicosRESUMEN
Spatial updating is the ability to keep track of the position of world-fixed objects while we move. In the case of vision, this phenomenon is called spatial constancy and has been studied in head-restraint conditions. During head-restrained smooth pursuit, it has been shown that the saccadic system has access to extraretinal information from the pursuit system to update the objects' position in the surrounding environment. However, during head-unrestrained smooth pursuit, the saccadic system needs to keep track of three different motor commands: the ocular smooth pursuit command, the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR), and the head movement command. The question then arises whether saccades compensate for these movements. To address this question, we briefly presented a target during sinusoidal head-unrestrained smooth pursuit in darkness. Subjects were instructed to look at the flash as soon as they saw it. We observed that subjects were able to orient their gaze to the memorized (and spatially updated) position of the flashed target generally using one to three successive saccades. Similar to the behavior in the head-restrained condition, we found that the longer the gaze saccade latency, the better the compensation for intervening smooth gaze displacements; after about 400 ms, 62% of the smooth gaze displacement had been compensated for. This compensation depended on two independent parameters: the latency of the saccade and the eye contribution to the gaze displacement during this latency period. Separating gaze into eye and head contributions, we show that the larger the eye contribution to the gaze displacement, the better the overall compensation. Finally, we found that the compensation was a function of the head oscillation frequency and we suggest that this relationship is linked to the modulation of VOR gain. We conclude that the general mechanisms of compensation for smooth gaze displacements are similar to those observed in the head-restrained condition.