RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We investigated the relationship between the basal and treatment-induced change in the tumor expression of the drug resistance gene MDR1 and the cellular injury response gene GADD153, and clinical response to paclitaxel treatment. METHODS: MDR1 and GADD153 mRNA levels were measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in tumor samples obtained by fine needle aspiration biopsy from 14 patients before and 24 h after paclitaxel infusion. RESULTS: There was no difference between responders and non-responders with respect to either the basal MDR1 mRNA level or the change in MDR1 mRNA level at 24 h after treatment (P = 0.464). Likewise, there was no difference in basal GADD153 mRNA level between responders and non-responders. However, there was a significantly greater increase in GADD153 mRNA at 24 h in responders compared with non-responders (P = 0.005). An increase in GADD153 mRNA level of 1.5-fold or higher predicted response with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in GADD153 mRNA level reflects chemotherapy-induced damage sufficient to be manifest as a clinically detectable reduction in tumor volume. Measurement of the change in GADD153 mRNA level successfully identified patients destined to respond as early as 24 h post-treatment.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Potenciadoras de Unión a CCAAT , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , ARN Mensajero/análisis , Factores de Transcripción/genética , Miembro 1 de la Subfamilia B de Casetes de Unión a ATP/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Paclitaxel/farmacología , Factor de Transcripción CHOP , Células Tumorales CultivadasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of high-dose progesterone, an inhibitor of P glycoprotein, on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 29 patients with various tumors were treated with single-agent paclitaxel (125 mg/m2 administered over 3 h once every 3 weeks) until progression of disease, at which point high-dose progesterone (3 g administered i.v. over 24 h) was added to the paclitaxel treatment program in 20 patients (13 women, 7 men). Pharmacokinetic studies of paclitaxel administered alone and with progesterone were performed in eight patients. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of paclitaxel were highly variable. High-dose progesterone increased the peak plasma levels (3.00 +/- 0.94 vs. 4.15 +/- 1.63 microM; P = 0.029; mean +/- SD) and the area under the curve (AUC; 14.3 +/- 4.75 vs. 17.3 +/- 5.59 microM x h; P = 0.006) of paclitaxel. The absolute neutrophil and platelet nadir counts did not differ significantly between the paclitaxel and the combined treatment cycles. Three of the 20 patients documented to have progressive disease on paclitaxel alone had partial responses when high-dose progesterone was added to the paclitaxel regimen. CONCLUSION: Progesterone had a statistically significant impact on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel. The addition of high-dose progesterone to paclitaxel is feasible, but the small number of patients prevents conclusions being drawn about the clinical efficacy of combined progesterone and paclitaxel.