RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective was to compare the outcomes of open mesh repair versus suture repair for small (≤1 cm in diameter) umbilical hernia. The primary endpoint was the 30-day outcomes including pain, and secondary endpoints were the 2-year outcomes including recurrences and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: This propensity-matched, multicenter study was carried out on data collected prospectively in the Hernia-Club database between 2011 and 2021. A total of 590 mesh repairs and 590 suture repairs were propensity score matched (age, sex, body mass index) at a ratio of 1:1. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Verbal Rating Scale-4 and 0â10 Numerical Rating Scale-11. RESULTS: Mesh insertion was intraperitoneal in 331 patients (56.1%), extraperitoneal in 249 (42.2%), and onlay in 10 (1.7%). The rate of 30-day complications and Numerical Rating Scale-11 pain scores on postoperative days 8 and 30 were similar between the groups, including surgical site occurrences (2.2 vs 1.4% after suture repair). At 1 month, postoperative discomfort (sensation of something different from before) was significantly (P < .0001) more frequent after mesh repair, whereas the rate of relevant (moderate or severe) pain (mesh repair: 1.1% vs suture repair: 2.6%) and the distribution of Numerical Rating Scale-11 scores did not differ between the groups. At the 2-year follow-up, mesh repair patients had fewer reoperated recurrences (0.2% vs 1.7%; P = .035) and no more pain or discomfort than suture repair patients. CONCLUSION: Both techniques are effective and safe. Mesh repair is likely to reduce the rate of recurrences. Concerns about postoperative pain and infection might not prevent the use of mesh in smallest umbilical hernias.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Umbilical , Humanos , Hernia Umbilical/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Suturas/efectos adversos , Recurrencia , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess whether the respective values of open and laparoscopic intraperitoneal repairs of umbilical hernias are related to the European Hernia Society diameter of defects. METHODS: This registry-based study compared the early and 2-year outcomes of 776 open versus 1,019 consecutive laparoscopic intraperitoneal repairs performed from 2011 to 2019. RESULTS: Intraperitoneal mesh repair, either laparoscopic or open, was found to be a safe procedure at the 2-year follow-up. The incidence of reoperated bowel obstructions was 0.3%. Compared with the open group: (1) postoperative surgical site occurrences in small (<2 cm) or medium (2-4 cm) hernias (0.3% vs 2.4%; P = .041; 1.4% vs 5.9%; P = .0002); (2) recurrence rates in large (≥4 cm) umbilical hernias (0.0% vs 8.6%; P = .0195); and (3) cumulative reoperation rates (0.9% vs 2.2%; P = .021) were significantly better in the laparoscopic group. Conversely, the rate of early pain on day 1 and 1 month postsurgery was higher in the laparoscopic group, for all hernia sizes (P < .001). The rate of moderate or severe chronic pain at 2 years was significantly higher in the laparoscopic group (8.1% vs 2.4%; P = .049) for small hernias. CONCLUSION: The respective benefit to drawback ratios for open versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal repairs were related to the European Hernia Society diameter of hernia defect. In medium-large hernias, the benefits of laparoscopic repair overrode its drawbacks. In small hernias, the low recurrence rate, reduced early and chronic pain, and better rate of ambulatory surgery suggest there is still a place for open repair.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Umbilical/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hernia Umbilical/diagnóstico , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Humanos , Incidencia , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure in the world. Our purpose was to evaluate the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), resolution of obesity-related comorbidities after SG, and identify predictive factors of weight loss failure. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of adults who underwent SG during 2014 in 7 Belgian-French centers. Their demographic, preoperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected and analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Overall, 529 patients underwent SG, with a mean preoperative weight and body mass index (BMI) of 118.9 ± 19.9 kg and 42.9 ± 5.5 kg/m2, respectively. Body mass index significantly decreased to 32.2 kg/m2 at 5 years (P < .001). The mean %EWL was 63.6% at 5 years. A significant reduction in dyslipidemia (28.0%-18.2%), obstructive sleep apnea (OSAS) (34.6%-25.1%), and arterial hypertension (HTN) (30.4%-21.5%) was observed after 5 years, but not for diabetes and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). At multivariate analysis, age >50 years old, BMI >50 kg/m2, and previous laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) remained independent predictors of weight loss failure. CONCLUSIONS: Five years after SG, weight loss was satisfactory; the reduction of comorbidities was significant for dyslipidemia, OSAS, and HTN, but not diabetes and GERD. Age >50 years old, BMI >50 kg/m2, and previous LAGB were independent predictors of weight loss failure.
Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Hipertensión , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Gastrectomía/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) became the most frequently performed bariatric procedure worldwide, gaining rapidly popularity thanks to its technical simplicity and the relatively good results. The aim of this Belgian-French study was to evaluate postoperative complications, weight loss, and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities after LSG, and identify predictive factors of weight loss failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted on all LSG performed during 2014 in 7 centers. Their demographic, preoperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected and analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Overall 529 patients underwent LSG, with a mean preoperative weight and body mass index (BMI) of 118.9 ± 19.9 kg and 42.9 ± 5.5 kg/m2, respectively. Postoperative mortality was null and early postoperative morbidity was 6%, including 2.5% of gastric leakage. BMI significantly decreased to 31.1 kg/m2 and 30.0 kg/m2 at 1 and 3 years, respectively (p < .001). The mean %EWL was 77.2 and 74.6% at 1 and 3 years. A significant reduction in dyslipidemia (28.0-16.8%), obstructive sleep apnea (OSAS) (34.6-23.3%) and arterial hypertension (HTN) (30.4-20.2%) was observed after 3 years, but it does not concern diabetes and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). At multivariate analysis, age > 50 years old, BMI >50 kg/m2 and previous laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) remained independent predictors of weight loss failure. CONCLUSIONS: LSG for morbid obesity is safe and effective. Satisfactory outcome after 3 years can be achieved regarding %EWL and some comorbidities such as dyslipidemia, OSAS, and HTN, but not diabetes and GERD. Age > 50 years old, BMI > 50 kg/m2 and previous LAGB were independent predictors of weight loss failure.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Bélgica/epidemiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore the impact of the absence of band fixation on the reoperation rate and to identify other risk factors for long-term complications. BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has been demonstrated to permit important weight loss and comorbidity improvement, but some bands will have to be removed mainly for failure or in case of planned 2-step surgery. Then, the absence of a gastro-gastric suture (GGS) would allow easier band removal. There are insufficient data to conclude that GGS should be abandoned, as the associated risk of band slippage has not been prospectively assessed. METHODS: The ANOSEAN study was a randomized controlled single-blind trial (CPP 2009-A00346-51). Primary outcome was reintervention rate for band removal or repositioning at 3 years. It included 706 patients in 17 bariatric centers. Patients in group 1 received a gastric band with GGS. Inclusion criteria were adapted from National Institutes of Health recommendations. Surgical technique was standardized among all surgeons. RESULTS: At 3 years, the reintervention rate for band retrieval or repositioning was significantly higher in the absence of band fixation (19.4% vs11.3%; P = 0.013), partly because of the slippage rate (10.3% vs 3.6%; P = 0.005). Body mass index <40âkg/m at baseline was also an independent risk factor of slippage (odds ratio 2.769, 95% confidence interval 1.373, 5.581). CONCLUSIONS: GGS prevents band slippage and lower reintervention rate at 3 years. Fixation could be discussed for patients with high BMI who are scheduled to undergo 2-step surgery, but it needs to be specifically assessed.
Asunto(s)
Gastroplastia/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Técnicas de Sutura , Adulto , Remoción de Dispositivos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Gastroplastia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Método Simple Ciego , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This clinical study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of COVA+™, a collagen membrane (CM), for the prevention of postoperative adhesions in abdominal surgery. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study concerned one hundred and thirteen patients undergoing two-stage abdominal surgeries between 2011 and 2014: either bariatric surgery (BS) or reversal of a diverting stoma (DS). They were divided into two groups, according to whether a CM was placed at the end of the first procedure or not. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of adhesions (incidence, severity, and extent) on the operative site during the second surgery using standard grading scales and a combined adhesion score. Secondary endpoints were the duration of reoperation and the overall postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in the BS group, and forty-eight patients in the DS group. Mean time interval between surgeries was 33.2 ± 51.1 weeks for BS and 14.1 ± 10 weeks for DS. In both indications, results in the CM group were better compared to the control group regarding incidence, severity, and extent of adhesions. Mean combined adhesion scores were lower in the CM group: respectively, 2.1 ± 1.6 versus 3.6 ± 1.7 (p < 0.001) for BS and 1.1 ± 1.7 versus 3.1 ± 2.2 (p < 0.005) for DS. In BS group, the operative duration at reoperation was significantly shorter if a CM was used: 56 ± 34 versus 77 ± 47 min (p < 0.03). No adverse events related to the use of the CM were observed. Overall complication rate was 13.5 % in the CM group versus 27.9 % in the control group. Ease of handling and application of the CM were rated as satisfying or very satisfying in the great majority of cases. CONCLUSIONS: In abdominal surgery, COVA+™ acts efficiently on the prevention of postoperative adhesions with lower incidence, severity, and extent levels. The CM can be used safely and might render reoperations less difficult.
Asunto(s)
Materiales Biocompatibles , Colágeno , Membranas Artificiales , Adherencias Tisulares/prevención & control , Adulto , Cirugía Bariátrica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación , Estomas QuirúrgicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). METHOD: Patients' inclusion criteria were uncomplicated gallstones, BMI ≤30, ASA score ≤2, and no past surgery in the upper abdomen. Five surgeons performed only SILC and seven only CLC. Data analyzed included operative time, morbidity, quality of life (QOL), cosmetic result, and global patient satisfaction. The last three parameters were evaluated 3 months after surgery. QOL was assessed with the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) questionnaire. Cosmetic result and patient satisfaction were rated using a 5-grade Likert scale. RESULTS: This study included 104 patients operated on between April and June 2010. A SILC was performed in 35 patients and a CLC in 69. The preoperative characteristics of the two groups were similar. Median operative time for SILC was higher than that for CLC: 55 versus 40 min (p < 0.001). Postoperative complications (0 vs. 2) and postoperative GIQLI scores (123 ± 13 vs. 121 ± 18) were not significantly different between groups. Cosmetic result and patient satisfaction were better for SILC than for CLC. The percentages of results rated as excellent were 68 versus 37 % (p < 0.006) and 80 versus 57 % (p < 0.039), respectively. For the whole group, multivariate statistical analysis revealed that postoperative GIQLI score and cosmetic result were independent predictive factors of patient satisfaction. The percentages of satisfaction rated as excellent were greater in patients who had a postoperative GIQLI score ≥130 (92 vs. 49 %, odds ratio [OR] = 4, p < 0.001) and in patients who had an excellent cosmetic result (82 vs. 47 %, OR = 7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to CLC, SILC is associated with a longer operative time, an equivalent morbidity and QOL, and a better cosmetic result. The improved aesthetic result also leads to a better global patient satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Bélgica , Índice de Masa Corporal , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/psicología , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Colelitiasis/cirugía , Cicatriz/etiología , Cicatriz/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estética , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether analysis of the frequency or regularity of uterine contractions can distinguish between women delivering vaginally and women requiring Cesarean section for dystocia. STUDY DESIGN: This was a case-control study. Cases meeting the following criteria were identified: nulliparous women in spontaneous labor, singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation, 37 to 42 weeks' gestation, Cesarean section for dystocia, a minimum of three analyzable hours of electronically archived cardiotocograph (CTG) prior to onset of the second stage. Cases delivered by Cesarean section for dystocia were each matched with two controls delivering vaginally. The peak of each contraction was visually identified and electronically marked on each CTG trace. A moving average (MTIME) and standard deviation (SDTIME) of five interpeak times were calculated for successive 30-minute periods and plotted against cervical dilatation for each group. RESULTS: Overall, both MTIME and SDTIME fell as labor progressed, with these changes being more marked in the vaginal delivery group. In women requiring oxytocin, the rate of fall of MTIME and SDTIME was significantly greater following oxytocin in the group which subsequently delivered vaginally (slope of MTIME -2.71 pre-oxytocin and -28.95 post-oxytocin, p=0.0004; slope of SDTIME -0.44 and -6.44, p=0.0002). No such change was seen in the Cesarean section group. CONCLUSION: As normal labor progresses, there is a shortening of the intercontraction interval and an increase in contraction regularity. A successful response to oxytocin augmentation may be predicted by the change in contraction pattern following treatment.