Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
J Neurosurg ; : 1-8, 2022 Feb 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35148516

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The authors' objective was to determine whether preoperative administration of tamsulosin decreases postoperative urinary retention after spine surgery. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial performed at a single institution between 2016 and 2019, eligible males aged 50 to 85 years were administered tamsulosin or placebo for 5 days prior to elective spine surgery. Patients were excluded if they were taking alpha adrenergic blocking drugs; were allergic to tamsulosin, lactose, or sulfa drugs; had a preexisting indwelling urinary catheter, orthostatic hypotension, history of urological surgery, or renal failure; or were scheduled for cataract surgery within 2 weeks. Screening identified 1051 eligible patients (140 declined participation, 150 did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 151 did not enroll for other reasons). A total of 610 patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.4 mg oral tamsulosin or an identical placebo capsule for 5 days preoperatively and 2 days postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients were included in the final statistical analysis. The overall rate of postoperative urinary retention was 9.7%, and tamsulosin had no observed effect on reducing the rate of postoperative urinary retention as compared with placebo (9.4% vs 9.9%, p = 0.96). There were no significant differences in the reported adverse events between groups. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to model the effects of patient, surgical, and anesthetic factors on postoperative urinary retention, and the study drug remained an insignificant factor. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not detect an effect of perioperative tamsulosin on reducing the rate of postoperative urinary retention in male patients aged 50 to 85 years who underwent elective spine surgery. This study does not support the routine use of tamsulosin to reduce postoperative urinary retention in patients without a previous prescription. It is unknown if subpopulations exist for which prophylactic tamsulosin may reduce postoperative urinary retention.

2.
World Neurosurg ; 127: e1210-e1214, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31004854

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The techniques for atlantoaxial arthrodesis have been modified over the years, and placing C1 lateral mass screws is a modern approach. C2 neuropathy is a complication of concern; however, sacrifice of the C2 nerve is an accepted and often favored adjunct. The impact of the technique for cutting the C2 nerve is not adequately addressed in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes from a series of roots sacrificed during C1-2 fusion with attention to the C2 transection method. METHODS: Clinical data were collected from trauma patients who underwent C1 screw fixation for atlantoaxial fusion. Chart review was performed and outcome assessed through telephone surveys to patients who were at least 6 months postoperative. Quality of life, C2 nerve function, neck pain, and head pain were assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-six roots were divided in 35 patients. There were no cases of occipital neuralgia at routine 3-month follow-up. Delayed telephone surveys were completed in 17 patients and exposed 4 cases of severe head/neck pain but none consistent with occipital neuralgia. CONCLUSIONS: C2 neuralgia is rare when sharply dividing the C2 root with the aid of bipolar electrocautery at the midportion of the ganglion where it overlies the C1-2 joint. A literature review suggests the impact of the root sacrifice method is an underappreciated modifiable factor in outcome. In future reports, description of the root transection technique is imperative and trials comparing ganglionectomy versus transection proximal to the ganglion or through the ganglion should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos , Atlas Cervical/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Raíces Nerviosas Espinales/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Neurosurg ; 127(6): 1392-1397, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28298034

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE Selecting the appropriate patients undergoing craniotomy who can safely forgo postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring remains a source of debate. Through a multidisciplinary work group, the authors redefined their institutional care process for postoperative monitoring of patients undergoing elective craniotomy to include transfer from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) to the neurosurgical floor. The hypothesis was that an appropriately selected group of patients undergoing craniotomy could be safely managed outside the ICU in the postoperative period. METHODS The work group developed and implemented a protocol for transfer of patients to the neurosurgical floor after 4-hour recovery in the PACU following elective craniotomy for supratentorial tumor. Criteria included hemodynamically stable adults without significant new postoperative neurological impairment. Data were prospectively collected including patient demographics, clinical characteristics, surgical details, postoperative complications, and events surrounding transfer to a higher level of care. RESULTS Of the first 200 consecutive patients admitted to the floor, 5 underwent escalation of care in the first 48 hours. Three of these escalations were for agitation, 1 for seizure, and 1 for neurological change. Ninety-eight percent of patients meeting criteria for transfer to the floor were managed without incident. No patient experienced a major complication or any permanent morbidity or mortality following this care pathway. CONCLUSIONS Care of patients undergoing uneventful elective supratentorial craniotomy for tumor on a neurosurgical floor after 4 hours of PACU monitoring appears to be a safe practice in this patient population. This tailored practice safely optimized hospital resources, is financially responsible, and is a strong tool for improving health care value.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Craneotomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Admisión del Paciente , Selección de Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Adulto Joven
4.
J Neurol Sci ; 372: 250-255, 2017 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28017223

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Flow diversion has allowed cerebrovascular neurosurgeons and neurointerventionalists to treat complex, large aneurysms, previously treated with trapping, bypass, and/or parent vessel sacrifice. However, a minority of aneurysms remain that cannot be treated endovascularly, and microsurgical treatment is too dangerous. However, balloon test occlusion (macro and micro), micro WADA testing, ICG, intra-angiography and intra-operative monitoring are all available to clinically test the hypothesis that vessel sacrifice is safe. We describe a dual-institution series of aneurysms successfully treated with parent vessel occlusion (PVO). MATERIALS/METHODS: Prospectively collected databases of all endovascular and open cerebrovascular cases performed at Maine Medical Center and Vanderbilt University Medical Center from 2011 to 2013 were screened for patients treated with primary vessel sacrifice. A total of 817 patients were screened and 17 patients were identified who underwent parent vessel sacrifice as primary treatment. RESULTS: All 17 patients primarily treated with PVO are described below. Nine patients presented with SAH, and 3/17 involved anterior circulation. Complete occlusion was achieved in 15/17 patients. In the remaining 2 patients, significant reduction in the aneurysm occurred. Modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0, signifying complete independence, was achieved for 16/17 patients. One patient died due to an extracranial process. CONCLUSIONS: Parent vessel sacrifice remains a viable and durable solution in select ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Many adjuncts are available to aid in the decision making. In this small series, patients naturally divided into vertebral dissecting aneurysms, giant aneurysms and small distal aneurysms. Outcomes were favorable in this highly selected group.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Aneurisma Intracraneal/cirugía , Oclusión Terapéutica/métodos , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía Cerebral , Femenino , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/terapia
6.
J Clin Neurosci ; 22(9): 1467-72, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26115896

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with neoplastic meningitis (NM) following Ommaya reservoir placement in order to determine whether any patient factors are associated with longer survival. NM is a devastating late manifestation of cancer, and given its dismal prognosis, identifying appropriate patients for Ommaya reservoir placement is difficult. The authors performed a retrospective review of 80 patients who underwent Ommaya reservoir placement at three medical centers from September 2001 through September 2012. The primary outcome was death. Differences in survival were assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. The Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression modeling were performed to identify factors associated with survival. The primary diagnoses were solid organ, hematologic, and primary central nervous system tumors in 53.8%, 41.3%, and 5%, respectively. The median overall survival was 72.5 days (95% confidence interval 36-122) with 30% expiring within 30 days and only 13.8% surviving more than 1 year. There were no differences in median overall survival between sites (p=0.37) despite differences in time from diagnosis of NM to Ommaya reservoir placement (p<0.001). Diagnosis of hematologic malignancy was inversely associated with death within 90 days (p=0.04; odds ratio 0.34), older age was associated with death within 90 days (p=0.05; odds ratio 1.5, per 10 year increase in age). The prognosis of NM remains poor despite the available treatment with intraventricular chemotherapy. There exists significant variability in treatment algorithms among medical centers and consideration of this variability is crucial when interpreting existing series of Ommaya reservoir use in the treatment of patients with NM.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Infusiones Intraventriculares , Carcinomatosis Meníngea/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Carcinomatosis Meníngea/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Prótesis e Implantes , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Interv Neuroradiol ; 21(1): 114-9, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25934785

RESUMEN

There is no standard of care for catheter size or post-procedure supine time in cerebral angiography. Catheter sizes range from 4-Fr to 6-Fr with supine times ranging from two to over six hours. The objective of our study was to establish the efficacy, safety, and cost savings of two-hour supine time after 4-Fr elective cerebral angiography. A prospective, single arm study was performed on 107 patients undergoing elective cerebral angiography. All cerebral angiograms were performed with a 4-Fr sheath-based system without closure devices. Ten minutes of manual compression was applied to the femoral access site, with further compression held as clinically indicated. Patients were then monitored in a nursing unit for two hours supine and subsequently mobilized. Nursing discretion was allowed for earlier mobilization. Patients were called the next day to assess delayed hematoma and bleeding. Estimates of cost savings and productivity increases are provided. All patients ambulated in two hours or less. There were no strokes or vessel dissections. Five patients (4.7%) experienced a palpable hematoma, three patients (2.8%) experienced bleeding immediately following the procedure requiring further compression, and one patient (0.9%) experienced minor groin oozing at home. No patient required transfusion, thrombin injection, or endovascular/surgical management of a groin complication. A two-hour post-procedure supine time resulted in cost savings of $952 per angiogram and a total of $101,864. 4-Fr sheath based cerebral angiography with two-hour post-procedure supine time is safe and effective, and allows for a considerable increase in patient satisfaction, cost savings and productivity.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Cerebral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Angiografía Cerebral/economía , Angiografía Cerebral/instrumentación , Angiografía Cerebral/métodos , Niño , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Descanso , Posición Supina , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
8.
Interv Neuroradiol ; 20(1): 5-11, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24556294

RESUMEN

Aspirin (ASA) is the mainstay of treatment in cerebrovascular and systemic vascular disease. ASA hypersensitivity can pose a challenge to achieving optimum medical management prior to and after neurointerventional treatment. Desensitization to ASA is well described in the allergy and cardiovascular literature, but there are no similar discussions specific to neurointervention. The purpose of our study was to describe our experience with ASA hypersensitivity management and review the relevant literature. Two cases of patients with symptomatic cerebrovascular disease requiring neurointervention who were successfully desensitized to their ASA hypersensitivity prior to treatment are described. The subsequent literature is reviewed. Several ASA desensitization protocols exist and have been proven to successfully treat ASA hypersensitivity and allow for ASA therapy to be safely initiated. We describe several previously published protocols. ASA desensitization is a safe and simple way to manage ASA hypersensitivity. We provide comprehensive management guidelines for the neurointerventionalist engaging in ASA desensitization.


Asunto(s)
Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Asma Inducida por Aspirina/etiología , Asma Inducida por Aspirina/prevención & control , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Anciano , Aspirina/inmunología , Asma Inducida por Aspirina/inmunología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/complicaciones , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/inmunología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Masculino , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 6(5): 379-83, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23737492

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: Symptomatic acute basilar thrombosis is associated with a high mortality rate. Aggressive endovascular management has led to survival rates of 35-50%. We report the largest series of endovascular reconstruction of occluded dominant vertebral arteries prior to basilar thrombectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective database since August 2010 of all neuroendovascular interventions was mined for patients undergoing basilar artery thrombolysis from which a group with vertebral artery reconstruction was selected. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for relevant clinical, technical, and outcome data. RESULTS: From August 2010 to September 2012, six patients were identified who underwent vertebral reconstruction prior to basilar thrombectomy. Patients ranged in age from 42 to 57 years (mean 51 years). Mean time from symptoms until recanalization was approximately 6 h. Angiographic Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction IIB reconstitution of the basilar trunk was achieved in all cases. There were no technical complications. Two patients had care withdrawn secondary to massive completed brainstem infarction and poor neurological status post intervention. Three patients are now independent at 12, 14, and 31 months, respectively. One patient, after a follow-up of only 8 months, has achieved a modified Rankin Scale score of 3. CONCLUSIONS: Complete vertebral occlusion below a basilar thrombus can be recanalized prior to thrombectomy. In this case series, 100% of the acutely occluded vertebral arteries could be opened using either anterograde or retrograde access. However, basilar thrombosis continues to be a devastating illness, with one-third of the patients in this series dying of progressive infarction despite angiographic patency of the large conduit vessels with technical complications.


Asunto(s)
Trombosis Intracraneal/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Trombectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Insuficiencia Vertebrobasilar/cirugía , Adulto , Arteria Basilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Basilar/cirugía , Angiografía Cerebral , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Arteria Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Vertebral/cirugía , Insuficiencia Vertebrobasilar/diagnóstico por imagen
10.
J Neurosurg Pediatr ; 7(3): 268-71, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21361765

RESUMEN

OBJECT: Helmet use has been associated with fewer hospital visits among injured skiers and snowboarders, but there remains no evidence that helmets alter the intracranial injury patterns. The authors hypothesized that helmet use among skiers and snowboarders reduces the incidence of head injury as defined by findings on head CT scans. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of head-injured skiers and snowboarders at 2 Level I trauma centers in New England over a 6-year period. The primary outcome of interest was intracranial injury evident on CT scans. Secondary outcomes included the following: need for a neurosurgical procedure, presence of spine injury, need for ICU admission, length of stay, discharge location, and death. RESULTS: Of the 57 children identified who sustained a head injury while skiing or snowboarding, 33.3% were wearing a helmet at the time of injury. Of the helmeted patients, 5.3% sustained a calvarial fracture compared with 36.8% of the unhelmeted patients (p = 0.009). Although there was a favorable trend, there was no significant difference in the incidence of epidural hematoma, subdural hematoma, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or contusion in helmeted and unhelmeted patients. With regard to secondary outcomes, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in percentage of patients requiring neurosurgical intervention, percentage requiring admission to an ICU, total length of stay, or percentage discharged home. There was no difference in the incidence of cervical spine injury. There was 1 death in an unhelmeted patient, and there were no deaths among helmeted patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized children who sustained a head injury while skiing or snowboarding, a significantly lower number of patients suffered a skull fracture if they were wearing helmets at the time of the injury.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Protección de la Cabeza , Esquí/lesiones , Fracturas Craneales/prevención & control , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cráneo/lesiones , Fracturas Craneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Craneales/mortalidad , Traumatismos Vertebrales/etiología , Traumatismos Vertebrales/prevención & control , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
11.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol ; 23(1): 18-24, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20706142

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Awake craniotomy offers an excellent means of performing intraoperative mapping and optimizing surgical resection of brain tumors. Awake craniotomy relies on a strong collaboration between anesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, and operating room staff. The authors recently introduced awake craniotomy for tumor resection at the Maine Medical Center and propose that it can be performed safely, effectively, and efficiently in a high-volume community hospital. METHODS: We describe a practical approach to performing awake craniotomy involving streamlined anesthetic protocols and simplified intraoperative testing parameters in a carefully selected group of patients. Our first 25 patients are retrospectively reviewed with particular attention to the anesthetic protocol, the extent of resection, the operative time, post-operative complications, the length of hospitalization, and their functional status at follow-up. RESULTS: The authors established an anesthetic protocol based primarily on midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and local anesthetic. The authors note that all but one patient was able to tolerate the awake procedure. Gross total resection was achieved in nearly 80% of patients with a glial tumor. Operative time was short, averaging 159 minutes of entire anesthesia care. Length of stay averaged 3.7 days. Persistent new post-operative deficits were noted in 2 of 25 patients. There was no substantial difference in total hospital charges for patients undergoing awake craniotomy when compared to a matched historical control. CONCLUSIONS: With attention focused on patient selection and a streamlined anesthetic protocol, the authors were able to successfully implement an awake craniotomy protocol in a community setting with satisfying results, including low operative morbidity, short operative times, low anesthetic complications, and excellent patient tolerance.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Intravenosa , Craneotomía/métodos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Manejo de la Vía Aérea , Anestésicos , Mapeo Encefálico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Craneotomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Selección de Paciente , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/etiología , Convulsiones/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vigilia
12.
Ann Intern Med ; 137(2): 77-87, 2002 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12118962

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Therapy with an aminoglycoside and a beta-lactam remains common empirical therapy for febrile neutropenic patients. Concerns of aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity have led to studies of alternate regimens. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ciprofloxacin-piperacillin is equivalent to tobramycin-piperacillin as empirical therapy for neutropenic fever. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind multicenter trial. SETTING: Seven U.S. university-affiliated hospitals and one private research center. PATIENTS: Febrile (temperature >/= 38 degrees C), neutropenic (neutrophil level < 1 x 10(9) cells/L) hospitalized patients who had leukemia, lymphoma, or solid tumors, or were undergoing bone marrow transplantation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received piperacillin, 50 mg/kg of body weight intravenously every 4 hours, and ciprofloxacin, 400 mg intravenously every 8 hours, or tobramycin, 2 mg/kg intravenously every 8 hours. MEASUREMENTS: Success was defined as resolution of infection and previously positive cultures without the need to give additional antimicrobial agents. RESULTS: 543 febrile episodes were evaluated, of which 471 were clinically evaluable (234 in the ciprofloxacin-piperacillin group and 237 in the tobramycin-piperacillin group). Success rates in the ciprofloxacin-piperacillin group (63 of 234 febrile episodes) and tobramycin-piperacillin group (52 of 237 episodes) were similar (27% vs. 22%, respectively; difference, 5.0 percentage points [95% CI, -2.3 to 12.8 percentage points]), as was survival (96.2% of patients receiving ciprofloxacin-piperacillin versus 94.1% of patients receiving tobramycin-piperacillin; difference, 2.1 percentage points [CI, -2.2 to 6.4 percentage points]). Additions to the initial antimicrobial regimen were the most common reason for treatment failure in both groups (accounting for 67% of failures in the ciprofloxacin-piperacillin group and 72% in the tobramycin-piperacillin group; difference, 5.0 percentage points [CI, -13.8 to 3.7 percentage points]). Fevers resolved faster in patients receiving ciprofloxacin-piperacillin than in patients receiving tobramycin-piperacillin (mean, 5 vs. 6 days) (P = 0.005). No significant differences in adverse events or toxicity were noted (P = 0.083). CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin-piperacillin is as safe and effective as tobramycin-piperacillin for empirical therapy of neutropenic fever.


Asunto(s)
Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapéutico , Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Tobramicina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversos , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Ciprofloxacina/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Fiebre/etiología , Humanos , Leucemia/complicaciones , Linfoma/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Neutropenia/etiología , Infecciones Oportunistas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Oportunistas/etiología , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/efectos adversos , Tobramicina/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA