Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nat Rev Dis Primers ; 3: 17048, 2017 Jul 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28748917

RESUMEN

Oesophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide and is therefore a major global health challenge. The two major subtypes of oesophageal cancer are oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), which are epidemiologically and biologically distinct. OSCC accounts for 90% of all cases of oesophageal cancer globally and is highly prevalent in the East, East Africa and South America. OAC is more common in developed countries than in developing countries. Preneoplastic lesions are identifiable for both OSCC and OAC; these are frequently amenable to endoscopic ablative therapies. Most patients with oesophageal cancer require extensive treatment, including chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and/or surgical resection. Patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal cancer are treated with palliative chemotherapy; those who are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive may also benefit from trastuzumab treatment. Immuno-oncology therapies have also shown promising early results in OSCC and OAC. In this Primer, we review state-of-the-art knowledge on the biology and treatment of oesophageal cancer, including screening, endoscopic ablative therapies and emerging molecular targets, and we discuss best practices in chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, surgery and the maintenance of patient quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , África Oriental/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , América del Sur/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Oncotarget ; 7(11): 12672-81, 2016 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26862857

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is associated with high mortality, and biomarker-driven treatment approach is currently lacking. This study evaluated safety and efficacy of a combination approach of chemotherapy followed by chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) +/- cetuximab, and the prognostic role of miR-21 in patients with LAPC treated with a multimodality approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a randomised phase II trial in which patients with inoperable LAPC were offered gemcitabine and capecitabine (GEM-CAP) for 16 weeks. Patients with stable disease or response after GEM-CAP were randomised to capecitabine or UFT plus radiotherapy (RT) (A), or capecitabine or UFT plus cetuximab plus RT (B). The primary outcome of the study was overall survival (OS). Clinical outcome was compared according to baseline circulating miR-21 levels. RESULTS: 17 patients were enrolled and treated with GEM-CAP, with 13 patients achieving disease control and being randomised to arms A (n:7) and B (n:6). After a median follow-up of 61.2 months, median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.4 months and 12.7 months, median OS was 15.8 months and 22.0 months in arms A and B respectively (p > 0.05). Patients with high baseline plasma miR-21 had worse PFS (3.5 vs. 12.7 months; p:0.032) and OS (5.1 vs 15.3 months; p:0.5) compared to patients with low miR-21. Circulating miR-21 levels reflected miR-21 expression within the tissues. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of Cetuximab to CRT following induction chemotherapy did not improve survival. High miR-21 baseline plasma expression was associated with poor clinical outcome in LAPC patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by chemo-radiotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , MicroARNs/sangre , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/sangre , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidad , Cetuximab/administración & dosificación , Cetuximab/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/sangre , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Tegafur , Uracilo , Gemcitabina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA