Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 150(5): 618-624, mayo 2022. graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1409840

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) is beneficial in patients with symptomatic severe Aortic Stenosis (AS). There is no consensus about the best anticoagulation strategy for patients with a recent TAVI and with atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective to prevent embolic events with a significant lower incidence of bleeding. There is scarce evidence about the use of these drugs in patients undergoing TAVI. AIM: To assess the management of anticoagulation at the moment of discharge of patients with AF and TAVI. Material and Methods: A four question survey was sent to cardiologists involved in TAVI programs in different international centers. Results: The survey was answered by 72 interventional cardiologists. Even with the lack of randomized evidence, in most of the scenarios DOACs are prescribed at discharge in patients with indication for anticoagulation. Also, in patients with high bleeding risk, most cardiologists would perform a left atrial appendage closure. In patients with concomitant coronary artery disease, if a stent was recently implanted, prescription of the combination of a DOAC and one antiplatelet drug was the most common answer. In patients with a former coronary angioplasty, DOAC or Warfarin was the therapy of choice. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of randomized data, interventional cardiologists prescribe DOACs at discharge to patients with AF and TAVI, without following current guidelines in most cases.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico
2.
Rev Med Chil ; 150(5): 618-624, 2022 May.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37906762

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) is beneficial in patients with symptomatic severe Aortic Stenosis (AS). There is no consensus about the best anticoagulation strategy for patients with a recent TAVI and with atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective to prevent embolic events with a significant lower incidence of bleeding. There is scarce evidence about the use of these drugs in patients undergoing TAVI. AIM: To assess the management of anticoagulation at the moment of discharge of patients with AF and TAVI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A four question survey was sent to cardiologists involved in TAVI programs in different international centers. RESULTS: The survey was answered by 72 interventional cardiologists. Even with the lack of randomized evidence, in most of the scenarios DOACs are prescribed at discharge in patients with indication for anticoagulation. Also, in patients with high bleeding risk, most cardiologists would perform a left atrial appendage closure. In patients with concomitant coronary artery disease, if a stent was recently implanted, prescription of the combination of a DOAC and one antiplatelet drug was the most common answer. In patients with a former coronary angioplasty, DOAC or Warfarin was the therapy of choice. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of randomized data, interventional cardiologists prescribe DOACs at discharge to patients with AF and TAVI, without following current guidelines in most cases.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Fibrilación Atrial , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Warfarina/efectos adversos
3.
Rev. chil. cardiol ; 39(2): 154-158, ago. 2020. graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1138528

RESUMEN

Abstract Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasing health care problem associated with thromboembolic risk about 5% per year, with high mortality and morbidity when associated to stroke. Oral anticoagulants (OAC) are the treatment of choice for preventing ischemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, these drugs are associated with an increased risk of serious complications such an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). In this context percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is an effective therapeutic alternative to OACs, with an increasing success rate. Novel devices might allow or facilitate the procedure in some anatomically and technically complicated cases. Two patients with a complex morphology of the LAA, in which the LAmbre (Lifetech Scientific [Shenzhen] Co. Ltd.) device was implanted with good technical and clinical results are presented.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía , Ecocardiografía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA