RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prolonged current survival of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients exposes them to new problems arising from the comorbidities they face. OBJECTIVES: To describe the situation of comorbidities, polypharmacy, therapeutic complexity and adherence in people living with HIV over 65 years of age and to assess the presence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) by applying deprescription criteria. METHODS: Observational study including HIV people (> 65 years) from a university tertiary level hospital. Demographic, clinical and pharmacotherapeutic characteristics of the patients and their treatments were studied. The prevalence of polypharmacy (> 5 medications) and the pharmacotherapy complexity, quantified by the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI), were calculated. Therapeutic adherence was assessed by the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ) and the medication possession ratio, according to prescription dispensing records. The Screening Tool of Older People's Prescriptions (STOPP) and List of Evidence-baSed depreScribing for CHRONic patients (LESS-CHRON) criteria were applied to identify PIP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: PIP in elderly people living with HIV. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included, 73% of whom were men, with a median age of 71 years (IQR 67 - 76) and a median duration of infection of 17 years (IQR, 9 - 21). Seventy percent of the patients suffered from dyslipemia, 66.7% from hypertension, 43.3% from diabetes and 26.7% from mental health disorders. Seventy percent of the patients took more than 5 medications and 30% more than 10. The MRCI of concomitant medications was higher (18.3 points) than the MRCI of antiretroviral therapy (5.1 points), 66.7% of the studied population was classified as adherent. Finally, 70% of the patients present some PIP according to the STOPP or LESS-CHRON criteria. The polypharmacy was significantly associated (p = 0.008) with meeting deprescription criteria. CONCLUSION: The elderly people living with HIV present numerous comorbidities and met the criteria for polypharmacy. Their pharmacotherapy complexity is mainly determined by the concomitant treatments. There is a high prevalence of meeting deprescription criteria in people living with HIV over the age of 65 and a clear relationship between polypharmacy and deprescription. The optimization of pharmacotherapy is necessary in this population.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: Tras la introducción del tratamiento antirretroviral se objetiva una disminución de los tumores definitorios de sida (TDS), mientras que los tumores no definitorios de sida (TNDS) han aumentado en pacientes infectados por VIH (PIV). Disponemos de poca información sobre el pronóstico y factores de riesgo asociados. Hemos estudiado la supervivencia y su relación con la inmunodeficiencia tras el diagnóstico de TDS o TNDS. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo, sobre 788 PIV de los que 133 desarrollaron una neoplasia maligna entre 2000-2016. Las neoplasias se dividieron en TDS o TNDS y el grado de inmunodeficiencia según el recuento de linfocitos T CD4 >o

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: After the introduction of antiretroviral therapy, a decrease in AIDS defining cancers (ADCs) is observed, while non-AIDS-defining cancers (NADCs) have increased in HIV-infected patients (HIP). We have little information about the prognosis and associated risk factors. We studied survival and its relationship with immunodeficiency after the diagnosis of ADC or NADC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, retrospective study of 788 HIP of whom 133 developed a malignancy between 2000-2016. Malignancies were divided into ADCs or NADCs and degree of immunodeficiency according to the CD4 T lymphocyte count> or

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: After the introduction of antiretroviral therapy, a decrease in AIDS defining cancers (ADCs) is observed, while non-AIDS-defining cancers (NADCs) have increased in HIV-infected patients (HIP). We have little information about the prognosis and associated risk factors. We studied survival and its relationship with immunodeficiency after the diagnosis of ADC or NADC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, retrospective study of 788 HIP of whom 133 developed a malignancy between 2000-2016. Malignancies were divided into ADCs or NADCs and degree of immunodeficiency according to the CD4 T lymphocyte count> or

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The percentage of older HIV-positive patients is growing, with an increase in age-related comorbidities and concomitant medication. OBJECTIVES: To quantify polypharmacy and profile types of non-antiretroviral drugs collected at community pharmacies in 2014 by HIV-positive individuals on antiretroviral therapy and to compare these findings with those of the general population. METHODS: HIV-positive patients (n=199) were compared with a group of patients from the general population (n=8,172), aged between 50 and 64 years. The factors compared were prevalence of polypharmacy (≥5 comedications with cumulative defined daily dose [DDD] per drug over 180), percentage of patients who collected each therapeutic class of drug, and median duration for each drug class (based on DDD). Results were stratified by sex. RESULTS: Polypharmacy was more common in HIV-positive males than in the male general population (8.9% vs 4.4%, P=0.010). Polypharmacy was also higher in HIV-positive females than in the female general population (11.3% vs 3.4%, P=0.002). Percentage of HIV-positive patients receiving analgesics, anti-infectives, gastrointestinal drugs, central nervous system (CNS) agents, and respiratory drugs was higher than in the general population, with significant differences between male populations. No differences were observed in proportion of patients receiving cardiovascular drugs. The estimated number of treatment days (median DDDs) were higher in HIV-positive males than in males from the general population for anti-infectives (32.2 vs 20.0, P<0.001) and CNS agents (238.7 vs 120.0, P=0.002). A higher percentage of HIV-positive males than males from the general population received sulfonamides (17.1% vs 1.5%, P<0.001), macrolides (37.1% vs 24.9%, P=0.020), and quinolones (34.3% vs 21.2%, P=0.009). CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy is more common in HIV-positive older males and females than in similarly aged members of the general population. HIV-positive patients received more CNS drugs and anti-infectives, specifically sulfonamides, macrolides, and quinolones, but there were no differences in the percentage of patients receiving cardiovascular drugs. It is essential to investigate nonantiretroviral therapy medication use in the HIV-positive population to ensure these patients receive appropriate management.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The increasing population of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected elderly patients results in a higher number of comorbidities and greater incidence of polypharmacy in addition to antiretroviral therapy (ART). The aim of this study is to describe the use of concomitant medication in older HIV-infected patients and to compare it with older general population. METHODS: The study included HIV-positive outpatients (>49 years) who received ART in 2011. Co-medication dispensed by pharmacies in that year was collected. Defined daily dose (DDD) for each drug was calculated by patient. A comparison was made between the use of co-medication among men between 50 and 64 years old in general population against the HIV-infected population. RESULTS: The study was based on 118 patients (77% men), of which 82% took at least one co-medication and 58% at least five. The commonest co-medications used by HIV-positive patients were antibiotics (44%); analgesics (44%); anti-inflammatories (39%); antacids (38%); and psycholeptics (38%). The medicines used for the greatest number of days per HIV-positive patient were those related to the renin-angiotensin system; anti-diabetics; lipid modifying agents; antithrombotics; and calcium channel blockers. In comparison with the general male population, a higher proportion of HIV-infected patients used antibiotics (42 vs 30%, P = 0.018), antiepileptics (16 vs 5%, P = 0.000), psycholeptics (35 vs 17%, P = 0.000) and COPD medications (14 vs 7%, P = 0.008). The duration of antibiotics and psycholeptic use in HIV-infected patients was longer compared to the general population (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Older HIV-positive patients frequently take a higher number of co-medication, which increases the risk of adverse events, interactions with other medication, and may lead to poorer treatment adherence.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The number of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) patients aged 50 years or over is growing year on year, due to both late diagnoses and the chronicity of the illness. This increase is a new phenomenon. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the older HIV infected population and determine if there are differences in antiretroviral treatment between younger and older patients. SETTING: This study was conducted in the outpatient hospital pharmacy service of a University Hospital in Spain. METHOD: A descriptive study involving HIV infected patients aged 50 years or older who received ambulatory antiretroviral therapy between January and December 2011. Variables related to HIV and to antiretroviral therapy were collected. A comparison of antiretroviral drugs used was made with the populations older and younger than 50 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Antiretroviral therapy differences between older and younger HIV-patients. RESULTS: 130 patients (20% of the antiretroviral treated patients) were 50 or over and 77% of these was aged between 50 and 59. At the time of diagnosis, 50% suffered an advanced state of disease. At the end of the study period, 58% had CD4 lymphocyte levels of over 500 cells/mm(3) and 90% had an undetectable viral load. The antiretroviral therapy of the older group that was based on protease inhibitors was used in the 51.5% of the patients compared with 54.4% in the younger group. The figures for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors based therapy were 43.8 and 39.8%, respectively. The older population used treatments that included tenofovir (56.9 vs. 64.8%, p = 0.105) less frequently and used more treatments that included abacavir (26.9 vs. 19.1%, p = 0.054) than the under 50's. CONCLUSION: Half the older HIV-infected patients were diagnosed with an advanced disease and the majority showed a positive response to antiretroviral therapy. There are no statistically significant differences between the frequency of antiretroviral therapy use in older and younger HIV-patients, although older HIV-patients has less often used treatments with tenofovir and more often used treatments with abacavir.

Asunto(s)