RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of tendinopathy in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) could be used to predict the course of tendon involvement in later disease and specifically the risk of tendon rupture. METHODS: The occurrence, pattern, and progression of tendinopathy were studied prospectively over 6 years in a cohort of patients who had presented with RA. Of 42 patients enrolled, full MRI and clinical data were available for 31 at 6 years. MRI scans of the dominant wrist were scored for tendinopathy by 2 radiologists using a validated system. These data were compared with MRI synovitis, erosion scores, and disease activity measures. Prognostic factors for tendon inflammation and rupture were sought. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (81%) had MRI evidence of tendinopathy at baseline, falling to 59% at 1 year and 68% at 6 years. The most commonly affected site was the extensor carpi ulnaris. MRI tendinopathy and synovitis scores were correlated at baseline (r = 0.37, P = 0.01) and 1 year (r = 0.45, P = 0.003) but not at 6 years (r = 0.11, P = 0.5). The strongest predictor of the 6-year tendinopathy score was the 1-year tendinopathy score (R(2) = 0.36, P = 0.0003 [beta = 1.28, SE = 0.31]). In 4 patients, extensor tendon rupture had occurred by 6 years. Their baseline and 1-year tendinopathy scores were higher than in the nonrupture group (medians 2.8 versus 1.0 [P = 0.04] and 4.3 versus 0.8 [P = 0.03], respectively), as were their Health Assessment Questionnaire scores (1.33 versus 0.54 [P = 0.02], 1.18 versus 0.25 [P = 0.03], and 0.98 versus 0.37 [P = 0.01] at 0, 1, and 6 years, respectively). For the group as a whole, the baseline tendinopathy score was predictive of rupture at 6 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.02-2.32, P = 0.03), as was the 1-year score (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03-2.04, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: MRI can be used to quantify tendinopathy at the wrist in RA patients. High scores in early disease were predictive of tendon rupture in a small group of patients, but further studies are required to determine whether this has clinical relevance.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tendinopatía/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Rotura Espontánea , Sinovitis/diagnóstico , Tenosinovitis/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Articulación de la MuñecaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the detection and scoring of erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using magnetic resonance (MR) and multidetector helical computerized tomographic (CT) scanning. METHODS: Comparative CT and MR scans of the dominant wrist were obtained from 9 patients with RA and clinical examination was performed to assess disease activity. MR and CT scans were scored for erosions and MR scans for bone edema by 2 radiologists using a validated system. Radiographs of the hands and feet were also scored for erosions using the modified Sharp score. RESULTS: In 117 of 135 (87%) sites there was concordance for erosions between MR and CT scans. At the remaining 18/135 sites (13%), erosions were identified by CT but not MR in 12/135 (9%) and by MR but not CT in 6/135 (4%). Partial volume artefacts on MR images and shifts in slice position were the most common reasons for erosion mismatch between MR and CT. The mean CT bone erosion score was significantly higher than the MR erosion score when individual bony sites were examined (p = 0.024), with the greatest difference being at the metacarpal bases. The total bone erosion score also tended to be higher on CT than MR [median scores of 20 (range 0-66) and 12 (0-51), respectively; p = 0.060]. MR and CT erosion scores correlated strongly with the total Sharp score (r = 0.93, p = 0.0002 and r = 0.94, p = 0.0002, respectively) and with the Disease Activity Score (MR: r = 0.77, p = 0.02; CT: r = 0.71, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Most erosions were detected using both modalities, but erosion scores were higher on CT than MR scans, especially at the metacarpal bases. It is possible that small erosions in some regions are more easily detected by CT because of its ability to clearly delineate cortical bony margins.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Articulación de la Muñeca/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Artrografía , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Muñeca/diagnóstico por imagen , Muñeca/patologíaAsunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Gadolinio DTPA , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Articulación de la Muñeca/patología , Adulto , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Método Simple CiegoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is capable of revealing synovitis and tendinitis in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as well as bone edema and erosion. These features are visible before radiographic joint damage occurs. We sought to examine whether MRI of one body region (the wrist) can be used to predict whole-body radiography scores reflecting joint damage at 6 years. METHODS: We conducted a 6-year prospective study of a cohort of patients who fulfilled the criteria for RA at presentation, using clinical parameters, radiographs, and MRI scans of the dominant wrist. Of the 42 patients enrolled at baseline, full MRI, radiographic, and clinical data were available for 31 at 6-year followup. MRI scans were scored by 2 radiologists, using a validated scoring system. Radiographs of the hands and feet were graded using the modified Sharp scoring method. MRI and radiography scores obtained at baseline and 6 years were compared, and baseline MRI scores were examined for their ability to predict radiographic outcome at 6 years. RESULTS: At 6 years, the total Sharp score correlated significantly with the total MRI score and the MRI erosion score (r = 0.81, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.79, P < 0.0001, respectively). The 6-year Sharp score also correlated with the baseline total MRI and MRI erosion scores (r = 0.56, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.33, P = 0.03, respectively). MRI synovitis and bone edema scores remained constant for the group as a whole over 6 years, but bone erosion scores progressed (P = 0.0001), consistent with radiographic deterioration. Erosions on 6-year MRI scans were frequently preceded by MRI bone edema at baseline (odds ratio 6.5, 95% confidence interval 2.78-18.1). Regression models indicated that the baseline MRI bone edema score was predictive of the 6-year total Sharp score (P = 0.01), as was the C-reactive protein (CRP) level (P = 0.0002). Neither shared epitope status nor swollen or tender joint counts predicted radiographic outcome in this cohort. A model incorporating baseline MRI scores for erosion, bone edema, synovitis, and tendinitis plus the CRP level and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate explained 59% of the variance in the 6-year total Sharp score (R(2) = 0.59, adjusted R(2) = 0.44). CONCLUSION: MRI scans performed at the first presentation of RA can be used to help predict future radiographic damage, allowing disease-modifying therapy to be targeted to patients with aggressive disease.