RESUMEN
QUESTION: Are there ways to mitigate the challenges associated with imperfect data validity in Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) report cards? FINDINGS: Applying a methodological framework on simulated PSI report card data, we compare the adjusted PSI rates of three hospitals with variable quality of data and coding. This framework combines (i) a measure of PSI rates using existing algorithms; (ii) a medical record review on a small random sample of charts to produce a measure of hospital-specific data validity and (iii) a simple Bayesian calculation to derive estimated true PSI rates. For example, the estimated true PSI rate, for a theoretical hospital with a moderately good quality of coding, could be three times as high as the measured rate (for example, 1.4% rather than 0.5%). For a theoretical hospital with relatively poor quality of coding, the difference could be 50-fold (for example, 5.0% rather than 0.1%). MEANING: Combining a medical chart review on a limited number of medical charts at the hospital level creates an approach to producing health system report cards with estimates of true hospital-level adverse event rates.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Algoritmos , Teorema de Bayes , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente , Proyectos de Investigación , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Routinely collected hospital data provide increasing opportunities to assess the performance of health care systems. Several factors may, however, influence performance measures and their interpretation between countries. OBJECTIVE: We compared the occurrence of in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing hip replacement across 5 countries and explored factors that could explain differences across these countries. METHODS: We performed cross-sectional studies independently in 5 countries: Canada; France; New Zealand; the state of California; and Switzerland. We first calculated the proportion of hospital inpatients with at least one deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism by using numerator codes from the corresponding Patient Safety Indicator. We then compared estimates from each country against a reference value (benchmark) that displayed the baseline risk of VTE in such patients. Finally, we explored length of stay, number of secondary diagnoses coded, and systematic use of ultrasound to detect DVT as potential factors that could explain between-country differences. RESULTS: The rates of VTE were 0.16% in Canada, 1.41% in France, 0.84% in New Zealand, 0.66% in California, and 0.37% in Switzerland, while the benchmark was 0.58% (95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.81). Factors that could partially explain differences in VTE rates between countries were hospital length of stay, number of secondary diagnoses coded, and proportion of patients who received lower limb ultrasound to screen for DVT systematically before hospital discharge. An exploration of the French data showed that the systematic use of ultrasound may be associated with over detection of DVT but not pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital VTE rates after arthroplasty vary widely across countries, and a combination of clinical, data-related, and health system factors explain some of the variations in VTE rates across countries.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/normas , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud/normas , Tromboembolia Venosa/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , California/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Suiza/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND In Canadian hospitals, clinical information is coded according to national coding standards and is routinely collected as administrative data. Administrative data may complement active surveillance programs by providing in-hospital MRSA infection data in a standardized and efficient manner, but only if infections are accurately captured. OBJECTIVE To assess the accuracy of administrative data regarding in-hospital bloodstream infections (BSIs) and all-body-site infections due to MRSA. METHODS A retrospective study of all (adult and pediatric) in-hospital MRSA infections was conducted by comparing administrative data against surveillance data from 217 acute Canadian hospitals (124 in Ontario, 93 in Alberta) over a 12-month period. Hospital-associated MRSA BSI cases in Ontario, and for all-body-site MRSA infections in Alberta were identified. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to compare the number of hospital-level MRSA cases within administrative versus surveillance datasets. The correlation of all-body-site MRSA infections versus MRSA BSIs was also assessed using the Ontario administrative data. RESULTS Strong correlations between hospital-level MRSA cases in administrative and surveillance datasets were identified for Ontario (r=0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.85) and Alberta (r=0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.94). A strong correlation between all-body-site and bloodstream-only MRSA infection rates was identified across Ontario hospitals (r=0.95; P<.0001; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96). CONCLUSIONS This study provides good evidence of the comparability of administrative and surveillance datasets in identifying in-hospital MRSA infections. With standard definitions, administrative data can provide estimates of in-hospital infections for monitoring and/or comparisons across hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:436-443.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Registros Médicos/normas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Alberta/epidemiología , Exactitud de los Datos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Ontario/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
With advances in the effectiveness of treatment and disease management, the contribution of chronic comorbid diseases (comorbidities) found within the Charlson comorbidity index to mortality is likely to have changed since development of the index in 1984. The authors reevaluated the Charlson index and reassigned weights to each condition by identifying and following patients to observe mortality within 1 year after hospital discharge. They applied the updated index and weights to hospital discharge data from 6 countries and tested for their ability to predict in-hospital mortality. Compared with the original Charlson weights, weights generated from the Calgary, Alberta, Canada, data (2004) were 0 for 5 comorbidities, decreased for 3 comorbidities, increased for 4 comorbidities, and did not change for 5 comorbidities. The C statistics for discriminating in-hospital mortality between the new score generated from the 12 comorbidities and the Charlson score were 0.825 (new) and 0.808 (old), respectively, in Australian data (2008), 0.828 and 0.825 in Canadian data (2008), 0.878 and 0.882 in French data (2004), 0.727 and 0.723 in Japanese data (2008), 0.831 and 0.836 in New Zealand data (2008), and 0.869 and 0.876 in Swiss data (2008). The updated index of 12 comorbidities showed good-to-excellent discrimination in predicting in-hospital mortality in data from 6 countries and may be more appropriate for use with more recent administrative data.
Asunto(s)
Comorbilidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Ajuste de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Suiza/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors predicting patient satisfaction 2 years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis. METHODS: Prospective multicenter study of patients followed up for 2 years after TKA for osteoarthritis. We evaluated pain and function (Lequesne index and WOMAC) at baseline and after 2 years. After 2 years, the patients rated their satisfaction as a percentage, with values greater than 50% defining good satisfaction. Factors associated with good satisfaction were identified by univariate analyses followed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 299 patients, 264 completed the study (26 were lost to follow-up, six died, and three refused the 2-year evaluation), including 237 (89.8%) with satisfaction scores greater than 50%. Highly significant improvements were found after 2 years versus baseline in the Lequesne index (7.9 vs. 14.5, P<0.0001) and WOMAC index (26.3 vs. 51.3, P<0.0001). There were 26 (9.8%) complications. Factors significantly associated with good satisfaction in the multivariate model were absence of complications (P=0.004), body mass index less than 27 kg/m² (P=0.015), high radiological joint narrowing score (P=0.038), age greater or equal to 70 years (P=0.038), and absence of depression at the 2-year evaluation (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: We report the first prospective multicenter study done in France to assess pain and function in a large number of patients treated with TKA for osteoarthritis. Our results indicate a high success rate. We identified three factors that predict patient satisfaction and can be assessed before surgery (age greater than 70 years, absence of obesity, and severe joint space narrowing).
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/rehabilitación , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Masculino , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Recuperación de la Función , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pain and disability at the time of knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. METHODS: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, 299 patients at 12 orthopedic surgery centers in Lyon, France were evaluated on the day before knee replacement surgery. Pain severity was assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS) and function using the Lequesne index and the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). RESULTS: There were 207 women and 92 men with a mean age of 73 years. Mean (+/-SD) VAS pain score upon walking was 55.8+/-24mm. Compared to patients with very severe disability (Lequesne index>12), those with mild-to-severe disability (Lequesne index