RESUMEN

Background: The safety and restriction regulations implemented to contain the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted people's quality of life compromising the perception of dignity. Preserving dignity for end-of-life patients remains a paramount objective in palliative care. This study aimed to compare dignity levels in terminal cancer patients between pre- and during-pandemic periods. Methods: Dignity was assessed by the Italian version of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-IT) in both pre- and during-pandemic groups of terminal cancer inpatients (hospitalized or admitted in hospice). The 2 groups were compared using non-parametric tests and a multivariate logistic regression analysis to estimate the association of the different dimensions of dignity with COVID-19 period, adjusting for other confounders. The study involved 2 groups of end-of-life cancer patients with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) index less than 50. The first group included 506 patients before COVID-19, and the second group consisted of 156 patients enrolled during pandemic. Results: Existential Distress, Loss of Purpose and Meaning, Physical Symptoms and Dependency, Social Support PDI subscales and PDI Total score were higher in the during-pandemic group. The multivariate regression model partially supported the previous results as Loss of Purpose and Meaning, Social Support, and Existential Distress PDI subscales were associated with during-pandemic period, whereas PDI Physical Symptoms and Dependency and PDI Psychological Distress were not. Conclusion: Social isolation and other restrictions put in place to contain the COVID-19 pandemic may have had a negative impact on the perception of dignity in cancer patients at the end of life.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Patients with cancer at the end of life may suffer from high psychological distress, a sense of demoralization, and a lack of dignity related to their medical condition. The This Is ME (TIME) Questionnaire and the Patient Dignity Question (PDQ) are clinical tools developed to achieve comprehensive and personalized patient care and to deepen our understanding of personhood. The objective of this study was to translate and validate the TIME Questionnaire, which contains the PDQ, into Italian to evaluate patient satisfaction of the Italian version of these tools and to identify essential themes elicited by the tools. METHODS: The validation process consisted of a forward and back translation stage, data collection from a sample of 60 patients with terminal cancer, and a final consultation with a panel of experts to identify patient themes using the results of the tool. RESULTS: Overall, participants felt that the PDQ/TIME questionnaire captured their essence as a person, allowed them to express their values and beliefs, and helped the health care professionals (HCP) to take better care of them. Content analysis identified "family relationships," "global pain," and "family roles and accomplishments" as being of most importance to patients. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The Italian versions of the PDQ/TIME Questionnaire are clear, precise, understandable, and focused on understanding personhood in patients with advanced cancer. These tools should be used to proactively enhance patient-caregiver and patient-HCP relationships and to develop new perspectives of patient care focused on the critical dimension of personhood.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The mutual influence between end-of-life cancer patients and their family caregivers is widely endorsed. The present study aimed to explore the relationship between end-of-life cancer patients' dignity-related distress and the distress of their caregivers. METHOD: A cross-sectional approach was used. The sample consisted of 128 patients with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) below 50 and a life expectancy of a few weeks, and their family caregivers. Personal and clinical data were collected and validated rating scales were administered: Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) to terminal cancer patients; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Demoralization Scale (DS), Herth Hope Index (HHI), Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), and Distress Thermometer (DT) to caregivers. RESULTS: Findings highlighted significant correlations between patients' scores on the Psychological Distress PDI subscale and the PDI Total Score and caregivers' Emotional Role. Patients' Psychological Distress, PDI Total Score, and Loss of Purpose and Meaning were associated with caregivers' Disrupted Schedule. Finally, patients' Physical Symptoms and Dependency, Loss of Purpose and Meaning, and PDI Total Score were correlated with caregivers' Disheartenment. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The results highlighted the key role of dignity as a relational dimension during the end-of-life phase. Therefore, because of caregivers' distress could affect patients' dignity-related distress by influencing the interpersonal aspects of patients' autonomy, it would be important to relieve caregivers' distress in order to promote patients' autonomy and minimize their fear of being a burden.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Patients' personality traits can play an important role in the end-of-life care process. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between personality traits and dignity in cancer patients nearing death. In addition, the associations between personality traits and physical, psychological symptoms, and coping strategies during the end-of-life stage were explored. METHODS: The study is cross-sectional. The sample consisted of 210 participants with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) lower than 50 and a life expectancy of a few weeks. For each patient, personal and clinical data were collected and a set of validated rating scales, assessing personality, dignity, physical, psychological symptoms and coping strategies was administered during the first psychological consultation. RESULTS: The results highlighted significant associations between personality traits and dignity. In particular, Conscientiousness was negatively correlated with Social Support and Extroversion was negatively associated with Loss of Purpose and Meaning. Neuroticism was related to all the dimensions of dignity and Extroversion was significantly associated with the physical and psychological symptoms. Regarding coping styles, active coping strategies were predictors of Extroversion and Agreeableness. Conversely, anxiety symptoms predicted the Neuroticism trait. CONCLUSIONS: Personality traits seem to be actively involved into the loss of dignity. These findings highlighted the importance of including personality traits and dignity into the patient's care process. Exploring individual differences and coping mechanisms at the end-of-life could improve palliative care and lead to better patient-tailored psychological interventions.

Asunto(s)