RESUMEN
Drug-coated balloons have emerged as a promising therapeutic option in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. This review article provides an overview of the concept of drug-coated balloons and their clinical applications in both de novo and treated coronary artery disease. A summary of key clinical trials and registry studies evaluating drug-coated balloons is presented for reference. Overall, this article aims to provide clinicians and researchers with a comprehensive understanding of the current state of drug-coated balloon technology and its implications in clinical practice.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Drug coated balloons (DCB) are potentially less thrombogenic than drug eluting stents (DES). AIMS: To explore the safety and the feasibility of single antiplatelet therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-coated balloons. METHODS: The All-comers Sirolimus-coated Balloon European Registry (EASTBOURNE) is a prospective investigator-driven registry assessing the performance of a novel sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) in a real-world population. This prespecified post hoc analysis aimed at comparing the outcome in patients prescribed either single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT); choice of antiplatelet agent and duration of the regimen were at operator's discretion in both groups. Primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were bleeding grade 3-5 according to The Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 12 months follow-up. RESULTS: Among 2123 patients enrolled in the study between September 2016 and November 2020, 113 patients (5.8 %) received SAPT while 1826 patients (94.1 %) received DAPT after SCB. The majority of the patients underwent DCB PCI for de novo lesions (n = 1091, 56.3 %) while 848 patients (47.7 %) had DCB revascularization for in-stent restenosis. No cases of TLR occurred in the SAPT group within one month after the index procedure, and no acute occlusive events were recorded during follow up in patients taking a single antiplatelet agent. Moreover, no differences in terms of TLR were observed between SAPT vs DAPT regimens nor in case of de novo treatment with an overall rate of TLR at 12 months of 7.7 % for SAPT and 5.6 % for DAPT (p = 0.6). The cumulative rate of MACE at 12 months was not different between SAPT and DAPT regimens (n = 12 [11.2 %] vs. n = 162 [8.9 %], p = 0.4), and results were consistent in the de novo and in-stent restenosis groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our post hoc analysis of the EASTBOURNE registry suggests that the use of single antiplatelet agent after sirolimus-DCB PCI for both de novo or in-stent restenosis lesions is safe and effective and can help to contain the risk of bleeding in a selected population. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: The manuscript aims to explore the feasibility of a single antiplatelet regimen following angioplasty using drug coated balloon with sirolimus. Among 2123 patients treated with sirolimus coated balloon (SCB), 113 patients (5.8 %) received a single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) while 1826 patients (94.1 %) received dual antiplatelet therapy DAPT. No cases of target lesion revascularization occurred in the SAPT group within one month after the index procedure, and no acute occlusive events were recorded during follow up in patients taking a single antiplatelet agent. The cumulative rate of major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months was not different between SAPT and DAPT regimens and results were consistent in the de novo and in-stent restenosis groups.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-coated balloon (DCB) is an attractive strategy for the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The implantation technique strongly influences the outcome of DCB PCI: accurate and adequate lesion preparation, short delivery time and sufficient DCB inflation time are deemed crucial to warrant adequate drug transfer and mitigate the risk of immediate vessel recoil and flow-limiting dissections. However, the optimal DCB inflation time is unclear, current consensus documents suggesting 30-60 s based on Experts' opinion. However, clinical studies comparing the prognostic role of different inflation times are scarce and mainly involve paclitaxel-coated balloons. In this study we aimed to assess the impact of different inflation times in patients undergoing PCI with a sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB). METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the prospective, multicenter, EASTBOURNE study, classified into two study groups according to balloon inflation time: long (>30 s) versus short (≤30 s). The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 24-month follow-up. Secondary clinical endpoints were major adverse clinical events (MACE), death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and BARC 2-5 bleedings. Furthermore, angiographic endpoints (the rate of bailout stenting and post-procedural TIMI flow <3) were also addressed. RESULTS: A total of 2289 lesions (2092 in the long inflation group, 197 in the short inflation group) were included in the analysis. Median balloon inflation time was 60 s in the long inflation and 30 s in the short inflation group. The two study groups experienced a similar rate of TLR [6.2 % in the short versus 6.3 % in the long inflation group, p = 1.00] as well MACE (p = 0.683), death (p = 0.102), non-fatal MI (p = 0.822), and BARC 2-5 bleedings (p = 0.252). These results were consistent when considering subpopulations with different target lesion phenotypes (in-stent restenosis, de-novo lesions, large and small vessels). Interesting, the rate of bailout stent implantation and post-procedural TIMI flow <3 was higher in the short SCB inflation time, as compared to the standard strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Short vs. long SCB inflation time is associated with a higher need of bailout stenting after PCI with SCB, with similar clinical outcomes at 24-month follow-up.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in complex coronary artery disease (CAD) has been established as the standard of care, but stent-related events are not uncommon. Sirolimus-Coated Balloon (SCB)-based angioplasty is an emerging technology, although it needs to be thoroughly evaluated compared with DES in the complex PCI setting. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of SCB-based angioplasty compared with new-generation DES in complex PCI. METHODS: Net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE: all-cause death, target lesion revascularization, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and major bleedings according to BARC classification), as a primary study endpoint was compared between SCB and new-generation DES for complex coronary lesions. RESULTS: Among 1782 patients with complex CAD, 1076 were treated with a sirolimus-coated balloon (EASTBOURNE Registry) and 706 with new-generation DES (COMPLEX Registry). After propensity score matching, a total of 512 patients in both groups were analyzed. NACE occurred more significantly in the DES group during the 1-year follow-up (10.5% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.003), mainly due to a higher risk of bleeding (6.6% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.001). The Cox model adjusted for lesion length showed a significantly lower hazard of NACE (HR: 0.23, CI [0.10, 0.52], p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.07, CI [0.01, 0.66], p = 0.020) in SCB compared to DES group. CONCLUSIONS: SCB angioplasty has an advantage over DES for the treatment of complex CAD regarding NACE, significantly reducing the incidence of major bleeding without increasing ischemic endpoints. SCB may be an alternative to DES in selected patients with complex coronary lesions.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Puntaje de Propensión , Sirolimus , Humanos , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Materiales Biocompatibles RevestidosAsunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Paclitaxel , Sirolimus , Animales , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Conejos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
The Magic Touch sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) was recently introduced in Europe and features robust clinical technology different from other devices on the market. This device is able to deliver a sufficient sirolimus dose to the target segment to reduce neointimal proliferation with very little exposure downstream and no apparent adverse effects at sustained high drug concentrations. The SCB represents a promising novelty within the drug-coated balloon arena due to its mid-term efficacy and safety in the treatment of coronary artery disease, especially in de novo and small-vessel coronary lesions. The purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date overview of the currently available animal and clinical trial results, as well as to highlight ongoing trials on the Magic Touch SCB.
Among modern drug-coated balloons, Magic Touch features Nanolutè technology, which allows effective and rapid sirolimus release and retention for 812 weeks. Previous and ongoing trials are showing good clinical performance with sustained safety.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Recent studies have shown gender differences in cardiovascular outcomes after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), highlighting different complication rates and adverse events, particularly in short-term assessments. As a result, there remains a significant knowledge gap on how these differences directly impact the efficacy and safety of LAAC procedures. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of LAAC in women and men using the Watchman FLX device. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzes gender-specific outcomes in 650 patients who underwent LAAC with the Watchman FLX device between March 2019 and May 2022, drawn from the ITALIAN-FLX registry. Results: The results show comparable rates of all-cause mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack and major bleeding in men and women 12 months after the procedure. Notably, no significant gender differences were found for periprocedural complications. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study shows that LAAC with the Watchman FLX device has comparable clinical outcomes between genders at both short-term and long-term follow-up.
RESUMEN
Background: The rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) is decreasing; however, it is still a challenge for contemporary invasive cardiologists. Therapeutic methods, including drug-eluting balloons (DEBs), intravascular lithotripsy, excimer laser coronary atherectomy, and imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES), have been implemented. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are burdened with a higher risk of ISR than the general population. Aims: DM-Dragon is aimed at evaluating the clinical outcomes of ISR treatment with DEBs vs. DES, focusing on patients with co-existing diabetes mellitus. Methods: The DM-Dragon registry is a retrospective study comprising data from nine high-volume PCI centers in Poland. A total of 1117 patients, of whom 473 individuals had DM and were treated with PCI due to ISR, were included. After propensity-score matching (PSM), 198 pairs were created for further analysis. The primary outcome of the study was target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results: In DM patients after PSM, TLR occurred in 21 (10.61%) vs. 20 (10.1%) in non-diabetic patients, p = 0.8690. Rates of target vessel revascularization (TVR), target vessel myocardial infarction, device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE), and cardiac death did not differ significantly. Among diabetic patients, the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the DEB group (2.78% vs. 11.11%, HR 3.67 (95% confidence interval, CI) [1.01-13.3), p = 0.0483). Conclusions: PCI with DEBs is almost as effective as DES implantation in DM patients treated for ISR. In DM-Dragon, the rate of all-cause death was significantly lower in patients treated with DEBs. Further large-scale, randomized clinical trials would be needed to support these findings.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that drug-coated balloons may benefit in-stent restenosis (ISR) treatment. However, the efficacy of new-generation sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) compared with the latest generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) has not been studied in this setting. METHODS: All patients in the EASTBORNE (The All-Comers Sirolimus-Coated Balloon European Registry) and DEB-DRAGON (DEB vs Thin-DES in DES-ISR: Long Term Outcomes) registries undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for DES-ISR were included in the study. The primary study end point was target lesion revascularization at 24 months. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 24 months. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SCB versus thin-struts DES in ISR at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1545 patients with 1679 ISR lesions were included in the pooled analysis, of whom 621 (40.2%) patients with 621 lesions were treated with thin-strut DES and 924 (59.8%) patients with 1045 lesions were treated with SCB. The unmatched cohort showed no differences in the incidence of target lesion revascularization (10.8% versus 11.8%; P=0.568); however, there was a trend toward lower rates of myocardial infarction (7.4% versus 5.0%; P=0.062) and major adverse cardiovascular events (20.8% versus 17.1%; P=0.072) in the SCB group. After propensity score matching (n=335 patients per group), there were no significant differences in the rates of target lesion revascularization (11.6% versus 11.8%; P=0.329), target vessel revascularization (14.0% versus 13.1%; P=0.822), myocardial infarction (7.2% versus 4.5%; P=0.186), all-cause death (5.7% versus 4.2%; P=0.476), and major adverse cardiovascular event (21.5% versus 17.6%; P=0.242) between DES and SCB treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, angioplasty with SCB compared with thin-struts DES is associated with comparable rates of target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and major adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Reestenosis Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Sistema de Registros , Sirolimus , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Reestenosis Coronaria/mortalidad , Reestenosis Coronaria/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Diseño de Prótesis , Europa (Continente) , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Catéteres Cardíacos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagenAsunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Sistema de Registros , Sirolimus , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Stents Liberadores de FármacosRESUMEN
In patients on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent (PCI), international guidelines endorse the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) rather than vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) rather than triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT). Aim of this study was to evaluate contemporary real-world data on antithrombotic regimens and outcome in patients on OAC undergoing PCI with stent. Consecutive patients on OAC undergoing PCI were enrolled in the multicentre, prospective, observational PERSEO registry (NCT03392948). Primary end-point was net adverse clinical events (NACE) with VKA vs DOAC, whereas a secondary pre-specified end-point was NACE with DAT vs TAT both at 1-year follow-up. From February 2018 to February 2022, 1234 consecutive patients were included. The main indication for OAC was atrial fibrillation (86%) and the mean CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4±2 and 3.6±1, respectively. Of the 1228 patients discharged alive, 222 (18%) were on VKA and 1006 (82%) on DOAC (p<0.01). DAT was employed in 197 patients whereas TAT in 1028. At follow-up, NACE rate was significantly higher with VKA compared to DOAC (23% vs 16%, p=0.013) and confirmed after propensity score adjustment. TAT and DAT did not differ as regards NACE rate (17% vs 19%, p=0.864) even though, compared to TAT, DAT was associated with less major bleedings (2% vs 5%, p= 0.014), confirmed after propensity score adjustment. In conclusion, in patients on OAC undergoing PCI, DOAC, compared to VKA, was associated with a significantly lower occurrence of NACE and DAT reduced bleedings compared to TAT.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The long-term outcomes for patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) presenting with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) are not well studied. AIMS: We aimed to investigate the outcomes for patients with drug-eluting stents (DES)-ISR and CCS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-coated balloons (DCB) or thin strut-DES. METHODS: A total of 846 consecutive patients from the Dragon-Registry with CCS and DES-ISR who underwent PCI with thin (strut thickness <100 µm) strut-DES (381 [45%]) or paclitaxel-DCB (465 [55%]) for DES-ISR were enrolled between February 2008 and October 2021. The median follow-up was 1006 (IQR 426-1770) days. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary outcomes were target vessel revascularization (TVR) and device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE: cardiac death, TLR, or target vessel myocardial infarction [TV-MI]). RESULTS: Patients who received DES, compared with those who received DCB, had lower crude rates of TLR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50 [95% CI, 0.34-0.74]; P <0.001), TVR (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.39-0.86]; P <0.001), and DOCE (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45-0.88]; P = 0.007). The incidence of cardiac death and TV-MI were similar in both groups. After matching, the observed differences persisted in terms of TLR (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.33-0.88]; P = 0.013), TVR (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.41-0.80]; P = 0.009) and DOCE (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.42-0.99]; P = 0.046) between the DES and DCB groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In long-term follow-up of CCS patients undergoing PCI of ISR, the use of DES was associated with reduced rates of TLR, TVR, and DOCE compared with patients treated with DCB.
Asunto(s)
Reestenosis Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Paclitaxel , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Angioplastia Coronaria con BalónAsunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/metabolismo , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Catéteres Cardíacos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Diseño de Equipo , Factores de Riesgo , AnimalesRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are a major global health concern. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) has been endorsed as safe and effective in the management of culprit and non-culprit lesions of ACS. However, permanent metallic implants may have drawbacks, including the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and the risk of long-term stent-related complications. An alternative approach using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) is gaining growing interest, having the potential of delivering therapy directly to vulnerable plaques, avoiding the need for permanent metallic implants, and potentially allowing for better long-term medical treatment. Despite limited evidence, DCB is being explored in several patients' subgroups. This review aims to discuss the existing evidence regarding DCB in ACS management. RECENT FINDINGS: DCB appears to be a promising strategy in the management of ACS, showing comparable angiographic and clinical results as compared to new-generation DES in relatively small clinical trials or large prospective registries. The advantage of avoiding permanent implants is particularly appealing in this setting, where DCB has the potential of delivering anti-atherogenic local therapy directly to vulnerable plaques still amenable to atherogenic regression. This review seeks to underline the theoretical background of DCB use and reports the available evidence in its support in the specific setting of ACS. In the context of ACS, the use of DCB is highly attractive, offering a dedicated anti-atherogenic local therapy, capable of addressing a broad range of vulnerable plaques and patients.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Humanos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Balloon angioplasty achieves luminal enlargement by fracturing the atherosclerotic intima at its point of least resistance, thereby creating a dissection plane and space with dehiscence of the intima from the media. This barotraumatic dissection triggers an inflammatory and proliferative reaction, resulting in a restenosis process at medium-term. In the era of plain old balloon angioplasty, quantitative angiographic studies at follow-up demonstrated that - the greater the acute luminal gain was after balloon angioplasty, the greater the late luminal loss was at follow-up. The interventional cardiologists coined the following motto "the more you gain, the more you lose". However, in the current era of drug coated balloon (DCB), it appears that this vexing conundrum could have been abrogated. A recently published DCB study in small de novo vessel has demonstrated that there was a slightly negative correlation between the volume of dissection assessed by optical coherence tomography and the angiographic late luminal loss (now gain) after Paclitaxel coated balloon treatment. In other words, the barotraumatic dissection does not necessarily herald a restenosis process in the era of DCB. This article revisits the mechanism of balloon angioplasty and explores how DCB with Paclitaxel may change the paradigm of balloon angioplasty as default treatment in CAD percutaneous treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronary bifurcation lesions are associated with less favourable outcome as compared to other lesion subsets. The role of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for bifurcation lesions has been only investigated in small studies so far, which reported encouraging results. We here describe the results of EASTBOURNE-BIF prospective registry, in which a sirolimus-DCB was used for the treatment of bifurcation lesions. METHODS: Overall, 194 patients with bifurcations lesions identified in the EASTBOURNE study (Medina 1.1.1/1.1.0/1.0.1/0.1.1/0.1.0) were compared with 1049 patients with de-novo lesions from the same registry. Both a blended-strategy using a drug-eluting stent in the main branch and a DCB in the side branch as well as a full-DCB approach were used in the treatment of bifurcation lesions. RESULTS: At one year of follow-up the study primary endpoint, target-lesion revascularization occurred at a similar rate in the bifurcation group versus the de-novo group (4.2 vs. 2%, P=0.28). Similar outcomes were observed in terms of all-cause death (3.3 vs. 1.4%, P=0.138), major adverse cardiovascular events (8.8 vs. 5.2%, P=0.081) and the rate of spontaneous myocardial infarction (2.8 vs. 1.0%, P=0.117). CONCLUSIONS: The results of EASTBOURNE-BIF study show how the use of this DCB alone or in combination with drug eluting stents could represent a safe and effective alternative to stents for the treatment of bifurcations.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Sistema de Registros , Sirolimus , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Femenino , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Seguimiento , Materiales Biocompatibles RevestidosRESUMEN
Continuous advances in the field of interventional cardiology have led to the development of drug-coated balloons (DCB). These represent a promising device for overcoming the well-known limitations of traditional metallic stents, which are associated with a persistent yearly increased risk of adverse events. This technology has the ability to homogeneously transfer the drug into the vessel wall in the absence of a permanent prosthesis implanted in the coronary vessel. Robust data support the use of DCB for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, but there is also currently growing evidence from long-term follow-up of large randomised clinical trials regarding the use of these devices in other scenarios, such as de novo small and large vessel disease, complex bifurcations, and diffuse coronary disease. Other critical clinical settings such as diabetes mellitus, high bleeding risk patients and acute coronary syndromes could be approached in the upcoming future by using DCB, alone or as part of a blended strategy in combination with drug-eluting stents. There have been important scientific and technical advances in the DCB field in recent years. The purpose of this paper is to review the most current data regarding the use of DCB, including the mid- and long-term follow-up reports on the safety and efficacy of this novel strategy in different clinical and angiographic scenarios.