RESUMEN
The increasing digitization of the healthcare system is leading to a growing volume of health data. Leveraging this data beyond its initial collection purpose for secondary use can provide valuable insights into diagnostics, treatment processes, and the quality of care. The Health Data Lab (HDL) will provide infrastructure for this purpose. Both the protection of patient privacy and optimal analytical capabilities are of central importance in this context, and artificial intelligence (AI) provides two opportunities. First, it enables the analysis of large volumes of data with flexible models, which means that hidden correlations and patterns can be discovered. Second, synthetic - that is, artificial - data generated by AI can protect privacy.This paper describes the KI-FDZ project, which aims to investigate innovative technologies that can support the secure provision of health data for secondary research purposes. A multi-layered approach is investigated in which data-level measures can be combined in different ways with processing in secure environments. To this end, anonymization and synthetization methods, among others, are evaluated based on two concrete application examples. Moreover, it is examined how the creation of machine learning pipelines and the execution of AI algorithms can be supported in secure processing environments. Preliminary results indicate that this approach can achieve a high level of protection while maintaining data validity. The approach investigated in the project can be an important building block in the secure secondary use of health data.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Inteligencia Artificial , Humanos , Alemania , Atención a la SaludRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Rating both a lung segmentation algorithm and a deformable image registration (DIR) algorithm for subsequent lung computed tomography (CT) images by different evaluation techniques. Furthermore, investigating the relative performance and the correlation of the different evaluation techniques to address their potential value in a clinical setting. METHODS: Two to seven subsequent CT images (69 in total) of 15 lung cancer patients were acquired prior, during, and after radiochemotherapy. Automated lung segmentations were compared to manually adapted contours. DIR between the first and all following CT images was performed with a fast algorithm specialized for lung tissue registration, requiring the lung segmentation as input. DIR results were evaluated based on landmark distances, lung contour metrics, and vector field inconsistencies in different subvolumes defined by eroding the lung contour. Correlations between the results from the three methods were evaluated. RESULTS: Automated lung contour segmentation was satisfactory in 18 cases (26%), failed in 6 cases (9%), and required manual correction in 45 cases (66%). Initial and corrected contours had large overlap but showed strong local deviations. Landmark-based DIR evaluation revealed high accuracy compared to CT resolution with an average error of 2.9 mm. Contour metrics of deformed contours were largely satisfactory. The median vector length of inconsistency vector fields was 0.9 mm in the lung volume and slightly smaller for the eroded volumes. There was no clear correlation between the three evaluation approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Automatic lung segmentation remains challenging but can assist the manual delineation process. Proven by three techniques, the inspected DIR algorithm delivers reliable results for the lung CT data sets acquired at different time points. Clinical application of DIR demands a fast DIR evaluation to identify unacceptable results, for instance, by combining different automated DIR evaluation methods.