RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Radical prostatectomy is a therapeutic option in organ-confined prostate cancer. As the development of robotic systems progresses, the approach with this technology has begun to impact the functional and oncological outcomes of urological patients. The objective is to report the rate of pentafecta in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) stratified by risk groups. METHOD: Retrospective, observational, descriptive study from 2013 to 2020 that included 112 patients undergoing RARP. RESULTS: A rate of pentafecta at 12 months of follow-up of 35.7% (n = 40) was obtained. In the subanalysis by risk groups, at 1-year follow-up, was obtained an index of 43% (n = 26), 26% (n = 9) and 22% (n = 4) in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prostatectomy showed functional and oncological results similar to those reported in the literature with robotic approach, regardless of the risk group for prostate cancer.

OBJETIVO: La prostatectomía radical es la alternativa terapéutica de elección en el cáncer de próstata confinado al órgano. Conforme avanza el desarrollo de los sistemas robóticos, el abordaje con esta tecnología ha comenzado a impactar en los desenlaces funcionales y oncológicos de los pacientes urológicos. El objetivo es reportar el índice de pentafecta en pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical asistida por robot (PRRA) estratificados por grupos de riesgo. MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, descriptivo, de 2013 a 2020, que incluyó 112 pacientes sometidos a PRAR. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvo un índice de pentafecta a 12 meses de seguimiento del 35.7% (n = 40). En el subanálisis por grupos de riesgo, al año de seguimiento, se obtuvieron unos índices del 43% (n = 26), el 26% (n = 9) y el 22% (n = 4) en los pacientes de bajo, intermedio y alto riesgo, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: La prostatectomía demostró resultados funcionales y oncológicos similares a lo reportado en la literatura con abordaje robótico independientemente del grupo de riesgo del cáncer de próstata.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has positioned itself as the approach of choice in the treatment of prostate cancer. Objective: To compare the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Retzius-Sparing (RS) approach against the modified Frankfurt (MF) technique. Method: To describe the perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes of 13 patients with prostate cancer who underwent RS robotic radical prostatectomy compared to MF, evaluating pathological results, urinary continence, sexual function and oncological control in 1 year of follow-up. Results: The average age was 64 years in RS group vs. 61 years in MF group. The values of total prostate antigen were higher in the RS group (25 ng/dl) vs. MF group (11 ng/dl). The volume of gland in RS group was 40.62 ml vs. 63.33 ml in the RS group. All patients were bilaterally neuropreserved, being statistically significant in favor of MF group (p = 0.016). Positive surgical margins were higher in R-S group (38.4%) vs. MF group (33.3%). Conclusions: With RS the same tendency to urinary continence is observed, with a significant difference in erectile function in favor of MF. This preliminary study shows better impact on erectile function.

Antecedentes: La prostatectomía radical asistida por robot se ha posicionado como el abordaje de elección en el tratamiento del cáncer de próstata. Objetivo: Comparar los resultados de la prostatectomía radical asistida por robot utilizando el abordaje Retzius-Sparing (RS) contra el Frankfurt modificado (FM). Método: Se describen los desenlaces perioperatorios, funcionales y oncológicos de 13 pacientes con cáncer de próstata que fueron llevados a prostatectomía radical robótica con RS, en comparación con FM, y se evalúan los resultados patológicos, continencia urinaria, función sexual y control oncológico a 1 año de seguimiento. Resultados: La media de edad fue de 64 años en el grupo RS y de 61 años en el grupo FM. Los valores de antígeno prostático total fueron mayores en el grupo RS (25 ng/dl) que en el FM (11 ng/dl). El volumen de la glándula fue menor en el grupo RS (40.62 ml) que en el FM (63.33 ml). Todos los pacientes fueron neuropreservados bilateralmente, siendo la diferencia estadísticamente significativa a favor de FM (p = 0.016). Los márgenes quirúrgicos positivos fueron mayores en el grupo RS (38.4%) que en el FM (33.3%). Conclusiones: Con RS se observa la misma tendencia a la continencia urinaria, con diferencia significativa en la función eréctil a favor de FM. Este estudio preliminar muestra mejor impacto en la función eréctil.

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective: To report outcomes from the largest multicenter series of penile cancer patients undergoing video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL). Materials and Methods: Retrospective multicenter analysis. Authors of 21 centers from the Penile Cancer Collaborative Coalition-Latin America (PeC-LA) were included. All centers performed the procedure following the same previously described standardized technique. Inclusion criteria included penile cancer patients with no palpable lymph nodes and intermediate/high-risk disease and those with non-fixed palpable lymph nodes less than 4 cm in diameter. Categorical variables are shown as percentages and frequencies whereas continuous variables as mean and range. Results: From 2006 to 2020, 210 VEIL procedures were performed in 105 patients. Mean age was 58 (45-68) years old. Mean operative time was 90 minutes (60-120). Mean lymph node yield was 10 nodes (6-16). Complication rate was 15.7%, including severe complications in 1.9% of procedures. Lymphatic and skin complications were noted in 8.6 and 4.8% of patients, respectively. Histopathological analysis revealed lymph node involvement in 26.7% of patients with non-palpable nodes. Inguinal recurrence was observed in 2.8% of patients. 10y- overall survival was 74.2% and 10-y cancer specific survival was 84.8%. CSS for pN0, pN1, pN2 and pN3 were 100%, 82.4%, 72.7% and 9.1%, respectively. Conclusion: VEIL seems to offer appropriate long term oncological control with minimal morbidity. In the absence of non-invasive stratification measures such as dynamic sentinel node biopsy, VEIL emerged as the alternative for the management of non-bulky lymph nodes in penile cancer.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To present the results of our case series on laparoscopic nephrectomy in xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis (XGP). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted that included 143 patients treated with laparoscopic nephrectomy for non-functioning kidney, of whom 15 had XGP, within the time frame of 2011 to 2019. The demographic and clinical data were collected, along with the intraoperative results, complications, and days of hospital stay. RESULTS: Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy was successfully performed on 15 patients with XGP, with no need for conversion. Mean intraoperative time was 124.4 minutes (range 70-240) and intraoperative blood loss was 148.5 ml (range 30-550), with no blood transfusion required. No intraoperative complications occurred but there was one postoperative complication (6.6%), classified as Clavien-Dindo I (surgical wound infection). Mean hospital stay was 2.85 days (range 2-7). CONCLUSIONS: Nephrectomy is the definitive management for XGP, and the laparoscopic approach should be considered a treatment modality, despite the fact that the pathology involves a severe chronic inflammatory process. Its benefits are reduced surgery duration, less blood loss, a lower complication rate, and fewer days of hospital stay, when performed by a skilled and experienced surgeon.

OBJETIVO: Presentar los resultados de nuestra serie de nefrectomía laparoscópica en pielonefritis xantogranulomatosa (PXG). MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo que incluyó 143 pacientes tratados con nefrectomía laparoscópica por exclusión renal, de los cuales 15 fueron por PXG, en el periodo comprendido de 2011 a 2019. Se recolectaron datos demográficos y clínicos, resultados transoperatorios, complicaciones y días de estancia hospitalaria. RESULTADOS: Se realizó nefrectomía laparoscópica transperitoneal de forma exitosa en 15 pacientes con PXG, sin necesidad de conversión. El tiempo transoperatorio promedio fue de 124.4 minutos (rango: 70-240). El sangrado transoperatorio fue de 148.5 ml (rango: 30-550), sin requerimiento de transfusión sanguínea. No se reportaron complicaciones transoperatorias; se presentó una complicación en el posoperatorio (6.6%) clasificada como Clavien-Dindo I (infección de la herida quirúrgica). La estancia hospitalaria promedio fue de 2.85 días (rango: 2-7). CONCLUSIONES: El manejo definitivo de la PXG es la nefrectomía, y el abordaje laparoscópico debe ser considerado como una modalidad de tratamiento a pesar de ser una patología que presenta un proceso inflamatorio grave y crónico, obteniéndose beneficios como disminución en el tiempo quirúrgico, menor sangrado, menor tasa de complicaciones y menos días de estancia hospitalaria cuando es realizado por un cirujano experimentado.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes from the largest multicenter series of penile cancer patients undergoing video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective multicenter analysis. Authors of 21 centers from the Penile Cancer Collaborative Coalition-Latin America (PeC-LA) were included. All centers performed the procedure following the same previously described standardized technique. Inclusion criteria included penile cancer patients with no palpable lymph nodes and intermediate/high-risk disease and those with non-fixed palpable lymph nodes less than 4 cm in diameter. Categorical variables are shown as percentages and frequencies whereas continuous variables as mean and range. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2020, 210 VEIL procedures were performed in 105 patients. Mean age was 58 (45-68) years old. Mean operative time was 90 minutes (60-120). Mean lymph node yield was 10 nodes (6-16). Complication rate was 15.7%, including severe complications in 1.9% of procedures. Lymphatic and skin complications were noted in 8.6 and 4.8% of patients, respectively. Histopathological analysis revealed lymph node involvement in 26.7% of patients with non-palpable nodes. Inguinal recurrence was observed in 2.8% of patients. 10y- overall survival was 74.2% and 10-y cancer specific survival was 84.8%. CSS for pN0, pN1, pN2 and pN3 were 100%, 82.4%, 72.7% and 9.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: VEIL seems to offer appropriate long term oncological control with minimal morbidity. In the absence of non-invasive stratification measures such as dynamic sentinel node biopsy, VEIL emerged as the alternative for the management of non-bulky lymph nodes in penile cancer.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pentafecta is currently the standard in the comprehensive evaluation of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, the objective of this study is the evaluation of oncological and functional outcomes in patients with prostate cancer of high risk undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. METHOD: Descriptive, retrospective study of 20 cases with a diagnosis of high-risk prostate cancer. The high-risk group is composed of a prostate-specific antigen equal or greater than 20 ng/mL, Gleason score equal or greater than 8, or clinical stages T2/T3 treated with robotic approach. RESULTS: Biochemical control was achieved from the first six weeks after the surgical event. 75% (n = 15) had negative surgical margins. 100% of the patients (n = 20) presented urinary continence immediately after removal of the urinary catheter. Erectile function was preserved at 3, 6 and 12 months in 100% of the patients who underwent neuropreservation but with use of an PDE inhibitor. (n = 5). Complications were reported in 10% (Clavien-Dindo I-II). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer is considered an appropriate treatment option in selected patients. A different experimental design is needed to define the advantages or disadvantages of this approach, as well as to determine its role and application in clinical practice.

ANTECEDENTES: Pentafecta es el estándar en la evaluación integral de los pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar y describir los desenlaces oncológicos y funcionales en pacientes con cáncer de próstata de alto riesgo sometidos a prostatectomía radical asistida por robot. MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, de 20 pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer de próstata de alto riesgo. El grupo de alto riesgo se compone por pacientes con antígeno prostático específico mayo o igual a 20 ng/ml, reporte histopatológico con Gleason mayor o igual a 8 y/o estadios clínicos T2/T3 tratados con abordaje robótico. RESULTADOS: El control bioquímico se alcanzó a partir de las primeras 6 semanas posterior al evento quirúrgico. El 75% (n = 15) presentaron márgenes quirúrgicos negativos. El 100% de los pacientes (n = 20) presentaron continencia urinaria inmediatamente después del retiro de la sonda vesical. La función eréctil se conservó a 3, 6 y 12 meses en el 100% de los pacientes a los que se realizó neuropreservación, pero con uso de inhibidor de la fosfodiesterasa (n = 5). Se reportaron complicaciones en el 10% de los casos (Clavien-Dindo I-II). CONCLUSIONES: La prostatectomía radical asistida por robot en pacientes con cáncer de próstata de alto riesgo se considera una opción de tratamiento adecuada en casos seleccionados. Se necesita un diseño experimental distinto para definir las ventajas o desventajas de este abordaje, así como determinar su papel y aplicación en la práctica clínica.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCCIÓN: El uréter retrocavo es una anomalía congénita rara que requiere manejo quirúrgico. OBJETIVO: Reportar los resultados en el manejo laparoscópico para uréter retrocavo y hacer una revisión bibliográfica. MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo, transversal, en pacientes con diagnóstico de uréter retrocavo que fueron sometidos a plastia laparoscópica de uréter retrocavo. RESULTADOS: Cuatro pacientes sometidos a plastia laparoscópica por diagnóstico de uréter retrocavo, 1 hombre y 3 mujeres, con una media de edad de 40.7 años. La media del tiempo operatorio fue de 138.2 minutos. La pérdida de sangre cuantificada transoperatoria media fue de 23.7 ml. Ningún paciente presentó complicaciones transoperatorias ni posoperatorias. Los pacientes permanecieron hospitalizados hasta su egreso una media de 2.5 días. Todos los pacientes presentaron mejoría de su sintomatología. CONCLUSIONES: El uréter retrocavo es una condición rara y aún no existe un consenso sobre su diagnóstico, tratamiento y seguimiento. El manejo quirúrgico laparoscópico es una opción para el tratamiento de estos pacientes. INTRODUCTION: The retrocave ureter is a rare congenital anomaly that requires surgical management. OBJECTIVE: Report the results in laparoscopic management for retrocave ureter and literature review. METHOD: Retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study in patients with a diagnosis of retrocave ureter who were sometimes a laparoscopic retrocave ureter. RESULTS: Four patients sometimes underwent laparoscopic plasty for diagnosis of retrocave ureter, 1 man and 3 women, with a mean age of 40.7 years. The mean operative time was 138.2 minutes. The mean intraoperative quantified blood loss was 23.7 ml. No patient presented transoperative or postoperative complications. The patients remained hospitalized until their progress with an average of 2.5 days. All patients visualize improvement in their symptoms. CONCLUSION: The retrocave ureter is a rare condition and there is still no consensus on its diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Laparoscopic surgical management is an option for the treatment of these patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ANTECEDENTES: Los quistes suprarrenales son una afección rara. Su diagnóstico y su tratamiento son un desafío debido a la escasa información, lo que genera incertidumbre respecto al mejor manejo. CASOS CLÍNICOS: Presentamos tres casos de quistes suprarrenales que recibieron tratamiento de mínima invasión con cirugía laparoscópica, sin presentar complicaciones y con una evolución favorable. DISCUSIÓN: Las nuevas técnicas quirúrgicas de mínima invasión ofrecen una oportunidad terapéutica que permite preservar estructuras y obtener material necesario para su diagnóstico histopatológico, así como la resolución de la sintomatología. BACKGROUND: Adrenal cysts are a rare entity; their diagnosis and treatment are challenging due to the lack of information, generating uncertainty regarding the best management. CASE REPORTS: We present three cases of adrenal cysts that received minimally invasive treatment with laparoscopic surgery, without complications and with a favorable evolution. DISCUSSION: The new minimally invasive surgical techniques offer a therapeutic opportunity that allows preserving structures and obtaining the necessary material for histopathological diagnosis, as well as a resolution of the symptoms.

Asunto(s)