RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Society of Breast Surgeons and American College of Radiology released a joint statement recommending that all breast screening studies be postponed effective March 26, 2020. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of all canceled mammograms at a single tertiary care institution from January 1-August 31, 2020 was performed to evaluate the effect of this recommendation by quantifying both the number and reason for mammogram cancellations before and after March 26, 2020. Utilization of the electronic patient portal for appointment cancellation as a surrogate for telehealth uptake was noted. RESULTS: During the study period, 5340 mammogram appointments were kept and 2784 mammogram appointments were canceled. From a baseline of 30 (10.8%) canceled mammograms in January, cancellations peaked in March (576, 20.6%) and gradually decreased to a low in August (197, 7%). Reasons for cancellations varied significantly by month (P < .0001) and included COVID-19 related (236, 8.5%), unspecified patient reasons (1,210, 43.5%), administrative issues (147, 5.3%), provider requests (46, 1.7%), sooner appointments available (31, 1.1%), and reasons not given (486, 17.5%). In addition, compared to a baseline in January (51, 16.5%), electronic patient portal access peaked in August (67, 34.0%). CONCLUSION: Screening mammogram cancellations have gradually recovered after early COVID-19 restrictions were lifted and increasing use of electronic patient access appears to be sustained. Consequences for future staging at the time of diagnosis remain unknown. Understanding to what extent the pandemic affected screening may help surgeons plan for post-pandemic breast cancer care.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) of the breast is commonly used for diagnosis of breast pathology, but has been less studied in young women. We sought to determine the effectiveness and necessity of PNB in patients younger than 35 years of age. The charts of sequential patients <35 years who underwent PNB between February 2013 and May 2016 were reviewed; 181 PNB were performed in 127 patients. Median age was 30 years (13-34). Indications for PNB were Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) ≥4 in 137 (75.7%) cases, with mass on imaging in 139 (76.8%). Carcinoma was diagnosed in 12 (6.6%), PNB in eight unique patients (6.3%). Other PNB pathology included atypia in four (2.2%) patients; papillary lesion, five (2.8%); benign lymph node, 10 (5.5%); fibroepithelial lesion, 15 (8.3%); benign breast tissue, 63 (34.8%); and fibroadenoma, 72 (39.8%). Women with atypia or malignancy were older than those with benign findings (30.9 vs 28.0 years, P = 0.002). No other patient or imaging factors were significantly associated with pathologic diagnosis on PNB. Routine PNB for all BIRADS 4 findings may be over-used in young women as most results are benign and subsequent surgical findings are concordant. Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast imaging is warranted to reduce unnecessary procedures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) provides axillary staging, recent trials question the necessity of removing positive nonsentinel axillary lymph nodes (LN) in breast cancer. We sought to determine the technical feasibility of percutaneous core needle biopsy (PNB) of axillary sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). METHODS: After dual tracer injection, 25 patients underwent intraoperative axillary ultrasound and ultrasound guided per PNB of the axillary LN at the site of radiotracer uptake, followed by standard SLND. The primary outcome measure was successful correlation of PNB with SLN, defined as: (1) similar final pathology in core and SLN and (2) presence of blue staining and/or radiotracer in the core or gross evidence of PNB at the SLN (e.g., transected SLN). RESULTS: Preincision axillary ultrasound identified a LN (mean size 1.15 ± 0.67 cm) at the site of radioactive tracer in 92 % (23 of 25) of cases. Gross evidence of PNB at the SLN was found in 76 % (19 of 25) of cases. Blue staining, radioisotope, and pathology matched in core and SLN specimens in 36 % (9 of 25), 64 % (16 of 25), and 72 % (18 of 25) of cases, respectively. Overall, successful correlation of core biopsy with SLN occurred in 72 % (18 of 25) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this phase I study demonstrate that PNB of the SLN is technically feasible, but further refinement of technique is warranted to improve correlation of core biopsy to SLND.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Breast cancer detection in women with implants has been questioned. We sought to evaluate the impact of breast implants on mammographic outcomes. A retrospective review of women undergoing mammography between March 1 and October 30, 2013 was performed. Demographic characteristics and mammogram results were compared between women with and without breast implants. Overall, 4.8 per cent of 1863 women identified during the study period had breast implants. Median age was 59 years (26-93). Women with implants were younger (53.9 vs 59.2 years, P < 0.0001), had lower body mass index (25.4 vs 28.9, P < 0.0001), and were more likely to have dense breast tissue (72.1% vs 56.4%, P = 0.004) than those without. There were no statistically significant differences with regards to Breast Imaging Recording and Data System 0 score (13.3% with implants vs 21.4% without), call back exam (18.9% with vs 24.1% without), time to resolution of abnormal imaging (58.6 days with vs 43.3 without), or cancer detection rate (0% with implants vs 1.0% without). Because implants did not significantly affect mammogram results, women with implants should be reassured that mammography remains useful in detecting cancer. However, future research is required to determine whether lower call back rates and longer time to resolution of imaging findings contribute to delays in diagnosis in patients with implants.

Asunto(s)