RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the outcome of rectus femoris muscle flaps (RFFs) for deep groin wound complications in vascular surgery patients and to compare the outcome with a cohort of sartorius muscle flaps (SMFs) because the RFF is a promising alternative technique for groin coverage. METHODS: All RFFs and SMFs performed by vascular surgeons in a regional collaboration in The Southern Netherlands were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes were muscle flap survival, overall and secondary graft salvage, and limb salvage. Secondary outcomes were 30-day groin wound complications and mortality, donor site and vascular complications, 1-year amputation-free survival, overall patient survival, impaired knee extensor function, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 96 RFFs were performed in 88 patients (mean age, 68 years; 67% male) and compared with a cohort of 30 SMFs in 28 patients (mean age, 64 years; 77% male). At a mean follow-up of 29 months and 23 months, respectively, comparable flap survival (94% vs 90%), secondary graft salvage (80% vs 92%), and limb salvage (89% vs 90%) rates were found. The 30-day mortality rates were 12% and 17%, respectively, and the 1-year amputation-free survival was comparable between treatment groups (71% vs 68%). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a large series of RFFs for deep groin wound complications after vascular surgery. We demonstrate that muscle flap coverage using the rectus femoris muscle by vascular surgeons is an effective way to manage complex groin wound infections in a challenging group of patients, achieving similarly good results as the SMF.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Músculo Cuádriceps/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico por imagen , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review is to assess potential differences in effectiveness (graft loss and limb loss) between the sartorius muscle flap (SMF) and the rectus femoris muscle flap (RFF) coverage technique for deep groin wound infection following vascular surgery. Our hypothesis was that RFF reconstruction is more effective in groin coverage. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases were systematically searched by two independent researchers for articles reporting effectiveness of both muscle flaps in the treatment of groin infections following vascular surgery. After quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Methodological Index for NOn-Randomized studies (MINOR) scores and data extraction, individual results of the included studies were reviewed. Weighted pooled outcome estimates were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies comprising 544 SMF reconstructions and 238 RFF reconstructions were included. The pooled flap survival rate was 100% in both groups, with a pooled amputation rate of 0% and 2%, respectively. In the RFF group, a pooled 30-day mortality rate of 0% was found, compared with 1% in the SMF group. Pooled graft loss rates were 2% in the RFF group and 21% in the SMF group. Only one head-to-head comparison between both muscle flaps was performed, finding no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Deep groin infection after vascular surgery can be treated with debridement and local muscle flap coverage. In this systematic review, superiority of either muscle flap on amputation or mortality rates was not demonstrated; however, there was a lower rate of vascular graft loss after RFF reconstruction. These conclusions are based on low-quality evidence because of limited data. Local muscle flap reconstruction using both techniques is effective in the treatment of infected groin wounds, achieving good results in a fragile group of patients. Therefore, anatomical and patient characteristics, which were not assessed in this analysis, are critical in the decision-making process on which muscle flap reconstruction is the best treatment option for an individual patient.
Asunto(s)
Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Ingle , Humanos , Músculo Esquelético/trasplanteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The practice of prescribing vitamin E after surgery for scar prevention and treatment is widespread and increasingly popular among both the public and clinicians. However, very little evidence exists for this "ritual." OBJECTIVES: This review was undertaken to critically analyze the current literature about the effect of vitamin E on treating scars. METHODS: The Cochrane, Medline, and PubMed databases were searched based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). The studies and levels of recommendation were graded according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) criteria. Only prospective studies were included. RESULTS: Only six studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these six included studies, three reported a significant improvement in the cosmetic appearance of scars when using vitamin E: one study used topical vitamin E in white children as monotherapy, and two studies used vitamin E in an adult population as combination therapy. The other three selected studies showed no significant improvement in scar appearance when using topical vitamin E as monotherapy. Two of the six included studies reported adverse events of vitamin E application: contact dermatitis and increased incidence of itching and rash. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there is not yet sufficient evidence that monotherapy with topical vitamin E has a significant beneficial effect on scar appearance to justify its widespread use. Further prospective studies with vitamin E monotherapy and/or combination therapy are warranted to draw better conclusions regarding the value of vitamin E in the management of scar healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Therapeutic.