RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effects of enteral nutrition with pharmaconutrients-enriched diets in critically ill patients and to establish recommendations for their use. DATA SOURCES: Computerized bibliographic search of published research and citation review of relevant articles. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials of critically ill patients treated with enteral nutrition comparing diets enriched with pharmaconutrients vs not enriched diets were included. Infectious complications and outcome variables (days on mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay and mortality) were evaluated. Studies were classified in four subgroups according to the patient's primary diagnosis: surgical, trauma, burned or medical. DATA EXTRACTION: A group of experts in methodology performed data extraction and statistical processes. A global analysis of the studies was done and also a separate study for each subgroup. Results of the meta-analysis were discussed within a 'clinical group' of clinicians with experience in the nutritional support of ICU patients, in order to find agreement about recommendations for the use of pharmaconutrients-enriched diets in critically ill patients. RESULTS: Independent review of 267 articles identified 26 relevant primary studies. Global results indicate that there was a reduction in infection rate in the pharmaconutrition group, considering the appreciated lower incidence in abdominal abscesses (OR: 0.26, CI: 0.12-0.55) (P=0.005), nosocomial pneumonia (OR: 0.54, CI: 0.35-0.84) (P=0.007) and bacteremia (OR: 0.45, CI: 0.35-0.84) (P=0.0002). Also, patients treated with pharmaconutrition diets have a reduction in time on mechanical ventilation (mean 2.25 days, CI: 0.5-3.9) (P=0.009), ICU length of stay (mean reduction of 1.6 days, CI: 1.9-1.2) (P<0.0001) and hospital length of stay (mean reduction of 3.4 days, CI: 4.0-2.7) (P<0.0001). No effects were appreciated on mortality (OR: 1.10, CI: 0.85-1.42) (P=0.5). Nevertheless, the separate analysis for each subgroup showed that the reported beneficial effects were not the same for each patient population. Also, the clinician panel of experts identifies several problems in the published data about enteral pharmaconutrition in critically ill patients. In spite of the subgroup differences and of the problems detected, the clinician group considered that the appreciated results could support a Grade B recommendation for the use of these formulas in ICU patients. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the beneficial effects and the absence of detrimental ones, the use of diets enriched with pharmaconutrients could be recommended in ICU patients requiring enteral feeding. Nevertheless, more investigation is needed in this field in order to find the more appropriate population of patients that can benefit from this nutritional therapy.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Fenómenos Fisiológicos de la Nutrición , Nutrición Enteral , Humanos , Sistema Inmunológico/fisiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
We investigated the effect of a glutamine-enriched enteral diet on intestinal permeability and infectious morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients who developed systemic inflammatory response syndrome after an acute event. Eleven intensive care units in tertiary-care hospitals participated in a prospective, randomized, single blind, multicenter trial. Eighty-four patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome of any etiology were randomly allocated to receive a glutamine-enriched enteral diet or a control diet without glutamine.Most patients received the planned caloric intake. The number of infected patients was smaller in the glutamine group than in the control group (11 versus 17 patients, P < 0.05), with a relative risk of 0.5 (95% confidence interval = 0.3-0.9). The most frequent infection was nosocomial pneumonia, with 11 (33%) patients in the control group and 6 (14%) in the glutamine group. There were no differences with respect to other infections, mortality, or length of stay. Intestinal permeability as assessed by the lactulose-mannitol test was unchanged in both groups.Glutamine-enriched enteral diets can decrease nosocomial infections in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.