RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe the first Italian experience of ICF implementation in the Labour Sector by a Ministerial body, and the development of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-based worker checklist. METHODS: Nation-wide training was provided. ICF-based worker checklist was developed by linking Italian legislative procedures and schedules to the ICF, and by adding standard ICF checklist's categories. When a third-level ICF category was linked, the corresponding second-level one was included in the worker checklist too. RESULTS: Eighty-four ICF categories were linked and five were added due to rolling-up procedure: 15 from body functions, 65 from activities and participation and 4 from environmental factors. In total, the dedicated ICF-based worker checklist is composed of 183 ICF categories, 34 of whom are at the third level and 89 from the domain of activities and participation. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of the standard ICF checklist's items aimed to complement the information contained in the ministerial schedule, in which ICF categories from environmental factors domain are underrepresented. Future directions include the development of an ICF-based company checklist and an application tool for matching the information derived from the worker and the company ICF-based checklists.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Ausencia por Enfermedad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vocabulario Controlado , Indemnización para Trabajadores/legislación & jurisprudencia , Lista de Verificación , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio , ItaliaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report on the preliminary results of an Italian project on the implementation of an ICF-based protocol for providing public services and benefits for persons with disabilities. METHODS: The UN Convention on the Rights of persons with disabilities (UNC) was mapped to the ICF, and core elements were implemented in an ICF-based evaluation protocol. A person-environment interaction classification (PEIC) tree was also developed for defining evaluation outputs. RESULTS: The PEIC and the ICF-based protocol are the guideline and the data interpretation source, respectively, for providing public services and benefits. They enable to assign persons to different services, from surveillance and monitoring to facilitator provision or sustain over time, to barrier removal or to the reorganisation of environmental factors provision. A detailed description of the target intervention is made available through the implementation of a protocol, which points out the effect of personal support and other environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS: The detailed description of functioning and disability provided by our methodology can help policy makers and administrators in decision making, on the basis of a description of real needs, and in targeting person-tailored interventions.