RESUMEN
The total artificial heart (TAH) has a long and rich history, being the product of decades of innovation, hard work, and dedication. This review examines the history of the TAH, a device that has revolutionized the treatment of end-stage biventricular heart failure. It reviews the development of the device from early concepts to the current state-of-the-art device, the SynCardia TAH, which has been implanted in over 2,000 patients worldwide. The article also discusses the challenges and successes experienced by researchers, clinicians, and patients throughout the development of TAH devices. Our focus will also be on discussing the hemostatic alterations in patients implanted with TAH and anticoagulation strategies to decrease associated thromboembolic risks. The article concludes with a look at other novel TAH devices and the future of TAH as an increasingly viable treatment for end-stage heart failure.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Artificial , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We sought to compare heart transplant (HTX) outcomes from patients with a total artificial heart (TAH), biventricular assist device (BiVAD), or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to transplant (BTT). Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS)-Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) created a dataset with TAH or durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) who reached HTX between 2006 and 2015. METHODS: The retrospective analysis compared TAH outcomes with those with a BiVAD or LVAD before HTX. The primary outcome was posttransplant survival at 1, 36, and 60 months. Secondary outcomes included simultaneous heart-kidney transplants, donor characteristics, and mortality risk factors. INTERMACS-SRTR cohort had, at the time of HTX, 2762 patients with LVAD; 205 BiVAD (139 durable and 66 temporary RVAD); 176 TAH (6 prior HeartMate II). RESULTS: Sixty months after HTX, mortality rates were 16.5% in the total group: LVAD 15.2%, BiVAD 22.4%, and TAH 29%. Survival differed between the LVAD, the TAH, and BiVAD but not between the BiVAD and TAH groups. One-year survival and complication rates were similar across groups-there was no difference in survival by donor age in the overall cohort. There was a difference in TTD based on recipient age in the LVAD group but not in BiVAD or TAH groups. Occurrence of HTX-kidney and post-transplant dialysis were higher in the TAH versus LVAD and BiVAD groups. CONCLUSIONS: The TAH is an efficacious BTT. Refinements in technology and patient selection may improve outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Artificial , Corazón Auxiliar , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diálisis Renal , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Corazón Artificial/efectos adversos , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been approved for use in patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate, high and extreme surgical risk. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of TAVR compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in intermediate risk patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies comparing TAVR versus SAVR in patients at intermediate surgical risk, with a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeon score of 3-8% or a mean logistic European risk score of 10-20%. The primary endpoint was to assess the efficacy of TAVR compared to SAVR, defined as all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 30-days, 1-year, and ≥2â¯years of follow-up. Secondary endpoints were the safety profile, comprising of cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarctions, permanent pacemaker placement, new onset atrial fibrillation, aortic regurgitation, vascular complications, major bleeding and acute kidney injury. RESULTS: This is the largest and most contemporary meta-analysis of 5647 intermediate risk patients in eleven studies published to date. There were no statistically significant differences in all-cause and cardiac mortality at 30â¯days, 1- year and >2-years of follow up. Acute kidney injury and atrial fibrillation occurred more frequently in patients treated with SAVR and permanent pacemaker implantation and aortic insufficiency were more frequent in patients treated with TAVR. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that for intermediate risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, TAVR has similar efficacy as SAVR but with a different adverse event profile.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The incidence of esophageal cancer has been steadily increasing in the United States over the past 25 years. Even with standardized surgical techniques, esophagectomy is a complex, multi-phase operation with a wide range of possible complications. The Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is a commonly used technique where the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) becomes the sole source of blood to the stomach. We describe a case of accidental transection of the RGEA which was then re-anastomosed followed by successful use of the gastric conduit. After an acceptable outcome, we suggest that in selected cases anastomosis of the RGEA should be considered.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/métodos , Arteria Gastroepiploica/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estómago/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Tomografía de Emisión de PositronesRESUMEN
AIM: The elderly population is the fastest growing demographic in developed countries. It is thus imperative to assess common medical procedures in this age group. Inguinal hernia repair is a commonly carried out operation in the USA with two methods of repair existing - laparoscopic and open. Although the advantages of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the general population have been shown, its role in the elderly has yet to be elucidated. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review with prospective follow up of 115 patients aged over 80 years who underwent either open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was carried out. Outcome measures included postoperative pain score, recovery time, chronic pain, wound infection, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, hematoma and recurrence. Patient satisfaction was measured with the Likert score. RESULTS: Of the 115 repairs, 31 repairs were carried out laparoscopically and 84 open. Mean patient age was 83.3 years (range 80-95 years), with no difference in demographics or comorbidities between the two groups. Mean recovery time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (7.5 vs 23.1 days, P = 0.02), as was the mean duration of pain in the laparoscopic group (1.4 vs 9.6 days, P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in other outcomes. There was a trend towards increased patient satisfaction in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: In octogenarians, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair confers a significantly shorter duration of pain and recovery time as compared with open inguinal hernia repair, with no increase in complications. For elderly patients, laparoscopy is a viable alternative to open repair.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hematoma/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función/fisiología , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Seguridad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Retención Urinaria/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The optimal method of umbilical hernia repair (UHR) in the obese population, laparoscopic vs open, is not standardized. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal surgical option for UHR in the obese population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 123 obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >30) who underwent UHR from 2003 to 2009 at a single institution. Patients were grouped by surgical approach (open vs laparoscopic). Intraoperative and postoperative courses were compared. Follow-up in the postoperative period was obtained from patient records and telephone interviews. RESULTS: Of the 123 patients undergoing UHR, 40 and 83 patients were operated on with the laparoscopic and open approach, respectively. Patients were well matched by demographics as well as comorbidities. No difference in the mean BMI was shown between the laparoscopic and open groups (37 vs 35, P = not significant, respectively). The operative time was significantly prolonged in the laparoscopic group (106 vs 71 minutes, P < .01). Intraoperatively, no complications occurred in either group. In the immediate postoperative period, 1 patient who underwent laparoscopic UHR was readmitted for small bowel obstruction, and 2 patients in the open group were readmitted, 1 for pain control and 1 for wound infection. Follow-up was achieved in 63% of the laparoscopic group and 58% of the open group with a mean follow-up of 15 months in the laparoscopic group and 20 months in the open group (P = not significant). A significant increase in wound infection was reported in the open group with mesh insertion when compared with the laparoscopic procedure (26% vs 4%, P < .05, respectively). No hernia recurrence was shown in the laparoscopic vs the open group with mesh insertion (0% vs 4%, P = not significant, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In obese patients, the laparoscopic approach was associated with a significantly lower rate of postoperative infection and no hernia recurrence. Laparoscopic hernia repair may be the preferred option in the obese patient.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Umbilical/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopía , Obesidad/complicaciones , Índice de Masa Corporal , Comorbilidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Femenino , Hernia Umbilical/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Proyectos de Investigación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare postoperative occurrences following ventral hernia repairs (VHRs) using mesh in clean-contaminated and contaminated wounds. BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repairs using mesh is one of the most common surgical procedures performed. However, guidelines and outcomes of repairs in clean-contaminated or grossly contaminated ventral hernias have not been established. METHODS: Patients who underwent VHR with mesh between the dates January 1, 2005 and April 4, 2010 at all hospitals in the United States participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) were reviewed. Data from 33,832 patients were analyzed by field contamination level and then compared with data from patients who underwent VHR without mesh. Data were analyzed using the odds ratio test with a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: The odds of having one or more postoperative occurrences were significantly greater in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases using mesh when compared with clean cases, with odds ratios of 3.56 (3.25-3.89) and 5.05 (1.78-12.41), respectively. There was a significantly increased risk of superficial surgical site infections (SSI) (2.53), deep SSI (3.09) and organ/space SSI (6.16), wound disruption (4.41), pneumonia (4.43), and sepsis (4.90) for clean-contaminated cases. Both clean-contaminated and contaminated cases had an increased risk of septic shock (5.82 and 26.74, respectively), and need for ventilator for more than 48 hours (5.59 and 26.76, respectively). In addition, there was a significantly increased odds ratio of complications in patients who underwent VHR with mesh (3.56) to nonmesh (2.52) in clean-contaminated cases. CONCLUSION: There is a significant increase in risk of postoperative occurrences following VHRs using mesh in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases relative to clean cases. We recommend avoiding the use of mesh in any level of contamination.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Choque Séptico/epidemiología , Choque Séptico/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Both polyester composite (POC) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh are commonly used for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. However, sparse information exists comparing perioperative and long-term outcome by mesh repair. METHODS: A prospective database was utilized to identify 116 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair at The Mount Sinai Hospital from 2004-2009. Patients were grouped by type of mesh used, PTFE versus POC, and retrospectively compared. Follow-up at a mean of 12 months was achieved by telephone interview and office visit. RESULTS: Of the 116 patients, 66 underwent ventral hernia repair with PTFE and 50 with POC mesh. Patients were well matched by patient demographics. No difference in mean body mass index (BMI) was demonstrated between the PTFE and POC group (31.8 vs. 32.5, respectively; P=NS). Operative time was significantly longer in the PTFE group (136 vs.106 minutes, P<.002). Two perioperative wound infections occurred in the PTFE group and none in the POC group (P NS). No other major complications occurred in the immediate postoperative period (30 days). At a mean follow-up of 12 months, no significant difference was demonstrated between the PTFE and POC groups in hernia recurrence (3% vs. 2%), wound complications (1% vs. 0%), mesh infection, requiring removal (3% vs. 0%), bowel obstruction (3% vs. 2%), or persistent pain or discomfort (28% vs. 32%), respectively (P=NS). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated no significant association between types of mesh used and postoperative complications. In the 12-month follow-up, no differences were noted in hernia recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Poliésteres , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Ensayo de Materiales , Persona de Mediana Edad , PolitetrafluoroetilenoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We present 2 cases of laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) splenectomy performed with a conventional laparoscope and instruments, and the use of a novel internal retraction device. METHODS: One patient underwent LESS splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), and a pediatric patient with sickle cell disease underwent LESS splenectomy and cholecystectomy. In each case, a 2-cm vertical incision was made within the confines of the umbilical ring, and a SILS port (Covidien, Norwalk CT) inserted. A 5-mm, 30-degree laparoscope and standard 5-mm instruments were used. After isolation of the splenic hilum, one 5-mm trocar of the SILS port was upsized to 12mm, and a laparoscopic stapler was used to divide the splenic artery and vein. An internal retractor consisting of a laparoscopic bulldog clamp with a hook attachment was used to retract the gallbladder, and to secure the specimen retrieval bag during splenic extraction, which eliminated the need for a fourth trocar. RESULTS: Total operative time was 160 minutes for the LESS splenectomy, and 216 minutes for the LESS splenectomy and cholecystectomy. Both procedures were successfully completed with conventional instrumentation and a SILS port, without the need for additional incisions or trocars. No complications occurred, and both patients had an uneventful recovery. CONCLUSIONS: LESS splenectomy is a feasible procedure that can be performed safely. Although articulating instruments and laparoscopes may offer advantages, they are not necessary for performing LESS splenectomy.
Asunto(s)
Anemia de Células Falciformes/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática/cirugía , Esplenectomía/instrumentación , Esplenectomía/métodos , Adulto , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopios , Laparoscopía/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We present a case of Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery (LESS) left adrenalectomy performed with a conventional laparoscope and instruments. METHODS: A 45-year-old male was diagnosed with hyperaldosteronism. Computed tomography detected a left adrenal nodule. Bilateral adrenal vein sampling was consistent with a left-sided source for hyperaldosteronism. RESULTS: Total operative time for LESS left adrenalectomy was 120 minutes. The surgery was performed with conventional instruments, a standard 5-mm laparoscope, and a SILS port, with no additional incisions or trocars needed. No complications occurred, and the patient reported an uneventful recovery. CONCLUSIONS: LESS adrenalectomy is a feasible procedure. Although articulating instruments and laparoscopes may offer advantages, LESS adrenalectomy can be done without these.
Asunto(s)
Adrenalectomía/métodos , Hiperaldosteronismo/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Adrenalectomía/instrumentación , Humanos , Laparoscopios , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) with nonarticulating instruments and conventional trocars. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a prospective database was used to identify 30 patients who underwent LESS. All procedures were begun using three 5 mm trocars, nonarticulating instruments, and a 5 mm, 30-degree laparoscope. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent LESS cholecystectomy. Four patients underwent LESS appendectomy; 2 for acute appendicitis and 2 for interval appendectomy. The mean patient age was 37.1 ± 14 years for the cholecystectomy group and 29.3 ± 2.2 years for the appendectomy group. Mean body mass index was 28.4 ± 7 kg/m2 for the cholecystectomy group and 25 ± 5.6 kg/m2 for the appendectomy group. Eight patients (31%) undergoing LESS cholecystectomy required an additional 5 mm port; 6 (26%) required 1 additional port for gallbladder retraction, 1 case (4%) required 2 additional ports to control cystic artery bleeding, and 1 case (4%) was converted to a traditional 4 trocar cholecystectomy because of chronic inflammation and multiple adhesions. None of the patients in the appendectomy group required an additional port. The mean operative time was 94 ± 19 minutes for cholecystectomy and 65 ± 19 minutes for appendectomy. Ninety-two percent (N=24) of patients in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group were discharged within 24 hours. One patient underwent postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with bile duct stone removal and was discharged after 48 hours. One patient remained until postoperative day 2 for pain control. All patients in the LESS appendectomy group were discharged within 24 hours. There were no postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although operative time for LESS is increased compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy, LESS can be performed safely. In our institutional experience, LESS was successfully performed using standard laparoscopic instruments, laparoscope, and trocars. Although longer follow-up is necessary, early data supports the feasibility and safety of LESS. A low threshold should exist for the addition of extra trocars, especially during a surgeon's early experience with LESS.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/métodos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Colecistitis/cirugía , Laparoscopios/normas , Laparoscopía/normas , Adulto , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) cholecystectomy requires a creative solution to retract the gallbladder. Transabdominal suture retraction is a commonly used technique to achieve adequate exposure of the critical structures within Calot's triangle. To avoid the multiple punctures of the gallbladder and abdominal wall required by such suture retraction, we developed a novel internal retractor specifically for use during LESS cholecystectomy. This retractor consists of a laparoscopic bulldog clamp fitted with a small metal hook, and was successfully used in a recent case of LESS cholecystectomy.
Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Colecistitis/cirugía , Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Abdomen/cirugía , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SuturasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Frequently, radiologists emphasize radiographic transition zones (RTZs) on computed tomography (CT), which are areas of abrupt change from dilated to collapsed bowel, as pathognomonic for small-bowel obstruction (SBO) diagnosis and location. The relevance of RTZs to patient management remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the surgical predictive value and intraoperative accuracy of RTZ. METHODS: A retrospective review of 200 patients with SBO who underwent abdominal CT at a single institution from 2002 to 2007 was performed. Statistical analysis was conducted using an unpaired t test, a Chi-square test, and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 200 patients with SBO, 150 (75%) had an RTZ. Seventy-five (38%) patients required operative intervention; 58 (39%) patients had RTZ and 17 (34%) patients did not have RTZ (P=NS). The presence of RTZ was not associated with increased probability of operative versus nonoperative management (odds ratio=1.19; 95% confidence interval [0.61-2.32]). The mean time to operative intervention was 3.6 days. Immediate operative intervention (<24 h) was equivalent in patients with versus without RTZ (57% vs 53%; P=NS) as was intervention for failed nonoperative management (43% vs 47%; P=NS). For patients who required operative intervention, RTZ correlated with intraoperative site of obstruction in only 31 (63%) patients. CONCLUSION: The presence of RTZs does not increase the likelihood of operative intervention or identify patients who will fail nonoperative management. RTZ should, therefore, not be used as a major criterion influencing operative versus nonoperative management decisions in patients with SBO. For patients who required operative intervention, RTZ had a 63% correlation with intra-operative findings, which makes it a useful adjunct to pre-operative planning.