Asunto(s)
Obstetras , Atención Prenatal , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ontario , PrisionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have demonstrated that outpatient total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is both safe and feasible. Our objective was to decrease length of stay for patients undergoing TLH by implementing a same-day discharge protocol at two Canadian teaching hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study assessing length of stay (primary outcome), perioperative complications, and readmission rates over a 12-month period following implementation of a same-day discharge protocol for TLH. These data were compared with pre-intervention baseline data collected retrospectively over a 12-month period immediately before protocol introduction. Our protocol consisted of patient education, instructions for perioperative care, and close follow-up. RESULTS: In the year prior to our protocol, 256 TLHs were performed. Forty-seven patients (18.3%) were discharged the same day, 191 patients (74.5%) were discharged on the first postoperative day, and 18 patients (7%) were admitted for 2 or more days. In the year following implementation, 215 patients underwent TLH of which 129 were enrolled in our study. The overall outpatient hysterectomy rate during that time period was 62% (134/215 patients). Among study participants, 102 patients (79.1%) were discharged the same day, 22 patients (17.0%) were discharged on the first postoperative day, and 5 patients (3.9%) were admitted for 2 or more days. There were no significant differences in perioperative complications or readmission rates and patient satisfaction scores were high. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a same-day discharge protocol successfully increased the rate of outpatient TLH without impacting patient safety. This protocol was acceptable to both surgeons and patients and can be easily adapted for use at other centres.
Asunto(s)
Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/normas , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Four blood collection and transfer devices commonly used for malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) were assessed for their consistency, accuracy and ease of use in the hands of laboratory technicians and village health workers. METHODS: Laboratory technicians and village health workers collected blood from a finger prick using each device in random order, and deposited the blood either on filter paper or into a suitable casette-type RDT. Consistency and accuracy of volume delivered was determined by comparing the measurements of the resulting blood spots/heights with the measurements of laboratory-prepared pipetted standard volumes. The effect of varying blood volumes on RDT sensitivity and ease of use was also observed. RESULTS: There was high variability in blood volume collected by the devices, with the straw and the loop, the most preferred devices, usually transferring volumes greater than intended, while the glass capillary tube and the plastic pipette transferring less volume than intended or none at all. Varying the blood volume delivered to RDTs indicated that this variation is critical to RDT sensitivity only when the transferred volume is very low. CONCLUSION: None of the blood transfer devices assessed performed consistently well. Adequate training on their use is clearly necessary, with more development efforts for improved designs to be used by remote health workers, in mind.