Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Med J Aust ; 204(1): 20-2, 2016 Jan 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26763810

RESUMEN

Despite recent changes in attitudes, most hospitals continue to experience pharmaceutical industry presence. Pharmaceutical industry presence may be necessary and beneficial in the context of sponsorship of clinical trials with appropriate governance. Doctors continue to hold positive attitudes towards market-oriented activities of the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. Despite evidence to the contrary, doctors believe they are able to effectively manage pharmaceutical sales representative interactions such that their own prescribing is not adversely impacted. Doctors also share a belief that small gifts and benefits are harmless. There may be significant financial burden associated with divestment of such sponsorship by hospitals. Change requires education and effective policies to manage pharmaceutical industry relationships and conflicts of interest. We discuss case studies involving students and public hospital doctors to show that divestment is possible without significant financial detriment. Health services need to be proactive in transitioning financial and cultural reliance on pharmaceutical industry sponsorship to other potentially less harmful sources.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Industria Farmacéutica , Publicidad , Australia , Conflicto de Intereses , Equipos y Suministros , Ética Médica , Apoyo Financiero , Hospitales , Hospitales Públicos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Médicos , Estudiantes de Medicina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA