Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair can lead to ejaculation and erection troubles in men. There are few studies on sexual dysfunction after endovascular repair (EVAR) but they suggest less retrograde ejaculation than after open repair. We assessed the sexual dysfunction and ejaculation troubles after elective laparoscopic repair or EVAR. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric prospective study on 124 patients undergoing AAA repair between 2013 and 2015. Sexual function was evaluated using the IIEF-15 questionnaire and questions on ejaculation. RESULTS: Only 45 patients (36.3%) accepted to complete the IIEF preoperatively with 20-37.8% having preoperative sexual dysfunction. Among them, 21 (46.7%) accepted to complete the questionnaire at 3, 6 and 12 months. Mean age at inclusion was 65±5.6 years in the laparoscopic group and 77±10.5 years in the EVAR group (P=0.003). Erectile and sexual function were slightly improved at 12 months in the laparoscopic group (+1.4 for erectile score and +4.6 for IIEF score) with no significant difference (P=0.83 and 0.74) whereas 8 patients (61.5%) had persistent ejaculation troubles at 3 months. In the EVAR group, patients had moderate sexual dysfunction at baseline without improvement at 12 months, but only one patient reported ejaculation troubles. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients eligible for AAA repair present with baseline erectile and sexual dysfunction. Laparoscopic AAA repair provides no onset of erectile or sexual dysfunction but a global improvement after surgery. Ejaculation troubles are frequent and persistent at 1 year. However, EVAR treatment, doesn't allow recovering of sexual function at 1 year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Laser in situ fenestration (LISF) is emerging as an immediately available alternative in the endovascular treatment of complex aortic aneurysm. However, its biomechanical features remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to experimentally evaluate textile damage secondary to LISF and to compare LISF with mechanical in situ fenestration (MISF). METHODS: An in vitro study evaluated the damage created by LISF on endograft fabrics versus MISF using a needle. Five different models of commercially available aortic endografts were used (32 samples of polyethylene terephthalate and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene fabrics). Tensile strength tests were performed on the fabrics before and after in situ fenestration, to determine the loss of mechanical strength. Integral water permeability tests at the stent-fenestration interface evaluated the watertightness of junctions. Stability of the connection was assessed with a fatigue bench test flexing the branch on the fenestration. In a second step, an in vivo study evaluating LISF in sheep was conducted. RESULTS: Resulting holes had circular and cauterised edges following LISF, whereas fabric filaments were pushed aside after MISF. Tensile tests demonstrated a 34% and a 27% mechanical resistance loss after LISF (p = .004) and MISF (p = .001) compared with non-fenestrated samples. A non-significant global decrease of 7% in mechanical resistance was found following LISF compared with MISF (p = .520). Water permeability tests highlighted that leak rates were higher following LISF than with MISF with regard to multifilament specimens (p < .05). Fatigue tests induced modification of the morphology of fenestrations. The surface area of the fenestration was increased for all samples after 170,000 cycles. Regarding the in vivo study, 14 LISF were performed in 12 sheep with a technical success rate of 88%. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that both LISF and MISF create substantial damage to all available endograft fabrics. Until comparisons with reinforced fenestrations are performed, LISF and MISF should not be used outside investigational studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Despite technical advances of fenestrated and branched endografts, endovascular exclusion of aneurysms involving renal, visceral, and/or supra-aortic branches remains a challenge. In situ fenestration (ISF) of standard endografts represents another endovascular means to maintain perfusion to such branches. This study aimed to review current indications, technical descriptions, and results of ISF. METHOD: A review of the English language literature was performed in Medline databases, Cochrane Database, Web of Science, and Scopus using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Sixty-seven relevant papers were selected. Thirty-three papers were excluded, leaving 34 articles as the basis of the present review. RESULTS: Most experimental papers evaluated ISF feasibility and assessed the consequences of ISF on graft fabric. Regarding clinical papers, 73 ISF procedures have been attempted in 58 patients, including 26 (45%) emergent and three (5%) bailout cases. Sixty-five (89%) ISF were located at the level of the arch, and eight (11%) in the abdominal aorta. Graft perforation was performed by physical, mechanical, or unspecified means in 33 (45%), 38 (52%), and two vessels (3%), respectively. ISF was technically successful in 68/73 (93%) arteries. At 30 days, two (3.4%) patients died in the setting of an aorto-bronchial fistula and an aorto-oesophageal fistula, respectively. No post-operative death, major complication, or endoleak was described as secondary to the ISF procedure. With follow-up between 0 and 72 months, four (6.9%) late deaths were noted, unrelated to the aorta. One (1.7%) LSA stent was stenosed without symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although there may be publication bias, multiple techniques were described to perform ISF with satisfactory short-term results. Long-term data remain scarce. Aortic endograft ISF is an off-label procedure that should not be used outside emergent bailout techniques or investigational studies. A comparison with alternative techniques of preserving aortic side branches is needed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the results of hybrid techniques for the treatment of thoracic, thoracoabdominal, and abdominal aortic aneurysms based on multicenter results and the various series regarding hybrid procedures reported in the literature. METHODS: The results of 76 hybrid procedures performed in 19 French university hospital centers between November 2001 and October 2011 were collected. There were 50 men and 26 women, mean age 68.2 (35-86) years. All patients were considered at high risk (ASA≥3) for conventional surgery. Aneurysms involved the thoracic, abdominal, and thoracoabdominal aorta in five, 14, and 57 cases respectively. There were 11 emergent repairs. The revascularization of four visceral arteries was performed in 38 cases. Between one and three visceral arteries were revascularized in the other cases. Visceral artery debranching and stent graft deployment were performed in a one-stage procedure in 53 cases and in a two-stage procedure in 23 cases. RESULTS: There were 26 (34.2%) postoperative deaths. Nine of the survivors developed paraplegia, of which one resolved completely. Bowel ischemia occurred in 13 cases (17.1%), and one patient was treated by a superior mesenteric artery bypass. Four patients required long-term hemodialysis. Postoperative computed tomography scan showed a type II endoleak in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality in this study were greater than previously reported. Candidates for hybrid aortic repair should be carefully selected.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Thrombo-embolic risk of intra-aortic foreign bodies (IAFB) is unpredictable. Endovascular retrieval is the treatment of choice but not always feasible. We report a case of total laparoscopic IAFB retrieval in a 37 years old patient. He underwent a percutaneous closure of a septal defect using a Helex device (WL Gore). Migration of the device occurred 6 months after the procedure. Device was located at the aortic bifurcation on CT scan. We performed a total laparoscopic retrieval through a transperitoneal direct approach of the abdominal aorta. Postoperative course was uneventful.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair enters the field of laparoscopic surgery. Main advantage of laparoscopic AAA repair is to perform the gold standard endoaneurysmorraphy with a reduced surgical trauma. Since 2001, the technique has evolved and is now well-established. We describe the standard technique of totally laparoscopic endoaneurysmorraphy with tube graft interposition through a transperitoneal left retrorenal approach. Main technical points are discussed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: Current treatment of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms is surgical. Despite significant advances in surgical technique and anesthetic management, significant morbidity and mortality remain associated with their repair. In compliance with principles of reducing postoperative morbidity, we developed a thoraco-abdominal endovascular graft in experimental models of type III and type IV thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm. This device had to preserve the vascularization of the visceral arteries while ensuring full aneurysmal exclusion. METHODS: Six implantations of the endovascular graft were performed. This graft was a modular system, made of: 1) a custom made main body containing 4 prosthetic visceral branches, 2) 4 self-expandable stent-grafts connecting prosthetic visceral branches with visceral arteries, 3) a custom made tubular endovascular graft connecting the main body with one of the iliac arteries. RESULTS: On angiographic controls, full aneurysmal exclusion was achieved while maintaining visceral artery perfusion. At the end of each procedure, the experimental model was opened. Macroscopic examination showed harmonious thoraco-abdominal endovascular graft deployments, without abnormal component constraint or kinking. There was no discordance between macroscopic and angiographic CONCLUSIONS: Our experimental work led to the development of a thoraco-abdominal endovascular graft, demonstrating feasibility of thoraco-abdominal aneurysm endoluminal treatment on an in vitro model close to the anatomical conditions observed in human pathology.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of the study was to describe our experience of total laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: Between February 2002 and September 2004, we performed 49 total laparoscopic AAA repair in 45 men and 4 women. Median age was 73 years (range, 46-85 years). Median aneurysm size was 52 mm (range, 30-95 mm). ASA class of patients was II, III and IV in 16, 32 and 1 cases, respectively. We used the laparoscopic transperitoneal left retrocolic approach in 47 patients. Seven patients were operated via a tranperitoneal left retrorenal approach and one patient via a retroperitoneoscopic approach. RESULTS: We implanted tube grafts and bifurcated grafts in 19 and 30 patients, respectively. Median operative time was 290 min (range, 160-420 min). Median clamping time was 81.5 min (range, 35-230 min). Median blood loss was 1800 cc (range, 300-6900 cc). Mortality was 6.1% (3 patients). In our early experience, two patients died of myocardial infarction. The 3rd death was due to a multiple organ failure. Thirteen major non lethal postoperative complications were observed in 9 patients (18%). Four patients had local/vascular complications, which required reintervention (8%). Nasogastric tube is now removed at the end of procedure. Median duration of ileus, return to general diet, ambulation and hospital stay were 2, 3, 3 and 10 days. With a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 8-39 months), complete recovery with patent graft was observed in 44 patients. Two patients needed a crossover femoral graft for one iliac dissection and one graft limb occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that total laparoscopic AAA repair is feasible and worthwhile for patients once the learning curve is overcome. It remains technically demanding and a previous training in videoscopic sutures is essential. Initial learning curve in laparoscopic aortic surgery with aortoiliac occlusive lesions is preferable before to begin laparoscopic AAA repair.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Total laparoscopic aortic repair is evolving and is now the technique of choice for the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in our department. With growing experience, surgeons will be confronted with the same peroperative situations than open surgery. We report a case of total laparoscopic AAA repair with peroperative diagnosis of aorto-caval fistula (ACF).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We describe the laparoscopic transperitoneal direct approach to the abdominal aorta. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: The patient is placed in the right lateral decubitus position, which allows dropping of the small bowel into right side of the abdomen. Anatomical exposure of the abdominal aorta follows the same steps as in open surgery. DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic transperitoneal direct approach allows a reproducible exposure of the abdominal aorta. This technique was useful when retrocolic and/or retrorenal approaches were not possible because of previous left nephrectomy.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We report a case of a successfully resected retroperitoneal benign schwannoma using laparoscopic surgery. A 62-year-old woman presented with an asymptomatic retroperitoneal mass. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a solid tumor compressing the inferior vena cava (IVC). First, we performed an intraoperative biopsy analysis, which revealed a benign neurologic tumor. We then proceeded with the complete laparoscopic resection of the tumor. Pathology revealed a benign schwannoma 8 x 5 cm in size. To our knowledge, only three other cases of the laparoscopic resection of retroperitoneal schwannoma have been reported. In our case, despite the large size of the tumor and the high level of compression of the IVC, a totally laparoscopic resection was feasible.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In situ prosthetic graft replacement (ISPGR) of an infected prosthesis raises the risk of recurrent infection in the new graft, especially in cases involving drug-resistant microorganisms. The purpose of this animal study was to evaluate in situ replacement of a vascular graft infected by a highly rifampin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis with the use of a rifampin-bonded polyester graft. Antibiotic bonding was obtained by soaking grafts in a high dose of rifampin solution (60 mg/mL). The infrarenal abdominal aorta of 20 dogs was replaced using a polyester prosthesis infected with a highly rifampin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis. One week later, the 18 surviving animals were randomized into three groups. Group I (n = 6) did not undergo reoperation. Group II (n = 6) underwent ISPGR using a rifampin-bonded prosthesis. Group III (n = 6) underwent ISPGR using an untreated prosthesis. All surviving animals were killed 28 days after the first procedure. Infectious signs were noted and bacteriological study was carried out on explanted prostheses and various tissue samples. The findings of this experimental study show that soaking a polyester prosthesis in a high-dose rifampin solution can prevent reinfection after in situ replacement of a prosthesis infected by a highly rifampin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This report describes a new technique for revascularization of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) which creates a retrograde bypass tunneled behind the left renal pedicle. The procedure can be performed by the left retroperitoneal or transperitoneal route, alone or in association with reconstruction of the infrarenal aorta. Proximal anastomosis is retrograde on the left side of the infrarenal aorta or aortic prosthesis. The course of the bypass runs first in the back and top of the retrorenal dissection plane, then loops behind and over the left renal pedicle, and finally turns downward and forward to the SMA. Distal anastomosis can be made either end-to-end or end-to-side. This large, loop-shaped course not only reduces the risk of kinking but also gives the bypass enough length to adapt to movements of the SMA. This technique has been performed in association with reconstruction of the infrarenal aorta in three patients. Postoperative control using Doppler ultrasound, arteriography, and helical CT scan showed no kinking or other abnormality. One patient died a month after the procedure from myocardial infarction. Follow-up Doppler ultrasound in the two surviving patients showed bypass patency with no stenosis at 19 and 30 months.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Embolic events during carotid angioplasty are a challenging problem. This experimental study was undertaken to determine the embolic risk after each stage of carotid angioplasty procedure. METHODS: Five ex vivo carotid artery balloon angioplasties were performed on fresh carotid specimens. The carotid specimens were obtained from five patients who underwent an internal carotid artery bypass for stenosis >75%. Before the endovascular maneuvers and after each stage of the procedures, the specimens were flushed with 20 mL of saline solution. Small particulate emboli (diameter, <60 microm) were searched in all the effluents according to the Coulter technique. After this procedure, each effluent was also submitted to scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: When the stenosis was crossed with the guidewire or the balloon catheter, the number and the mean diameter of embolic particles did not change with three plaques (CP1, CP2, and CP3) and were increased with two plaques (CP4 and CP5). The maximal size of particles was 220 microm (CP5). After balloon angioplasty, the number and the mean diameter of particles increased with CP1, CP2, and CP3. With CP4 and CP5, the number of particles decreased, but their size increased. The maximal size of particles was 1100 microm (CP4). CONCLUSION: Carotid balloon angioplasty generates embolic particles after each stage of the procedure. Techniques of prevention should then be effective from the initial step of the angioplasty procedure, and the selection of patients for carotid angioplasty remains crucial.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate dual-slice helical CT in the pretherapy assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Dual-slice helical CT angiography was performed in 47 consecutive patients (mean age, 59 years) with abdominal aortic aneurysm to determine whether we could then evaluate the extent of aneurysm and see associated renal, celiac, mesenteric, and iliofemoral artery disease. Results were compared with those of digital subtraction angiography (n = 47) and surgery (n = 37). RESULTS: The proximal and distal extents of abdominal aortic aneurysm correlated well with surgical findings. Dual-slice helical CT showed all main (n = 102) and accessory (n = 13) renal arteries with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 100% for revealing associated renal artery stenosis exceeding 50%. Sensitivity and specificity of dual-slice helical CT for revealing stenosis exceeding 75% in celiac and superior mesenteric arteries were both 100%. Three of four iliofemoral artery stenoses and two occlusions of the common iliac artery were revealed by dual-slice helical CT. CONCLUSION: Helical CT angiography with dual-slice scanning is a useful and minimally invasive technique that can provide with high accuracy all the necessary information for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Asunto(s)