RESUMEN

Purpose: Various surgical treatments have been described for the treatment of reverse Hill-Sachs lesions (rHSls) sized between 20% and 50% in the case of posterior shoulder dislocation. The aim of this systematic review is to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of subscapularis or lesser tuberosity transfer (McLaughlin and modified procedures) compared to bone or osteochondral autograft or allograft. Methods: A systematic review was performed on five medical databases up to December 2022. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies of all levels of evidence describing clinical or radiological outcomes of either procedure. The assessment of the quality of evidence was performed with the Modified Coleman Score. Results: A total of 14 studies (five prospective and nine retrospective) were included. A total of 153 patients (155 shoulders, 78.4% male) with a mean age of 37.2 (22-79) years were reviewed at an average follow-up of 53.1 (7.1-294) months. No relevant difference was found for the clinical scores, range of motion, complications and redislocation rate between the two treatments. Radiological osteoarthritis (OA) was reported in 11% (10/87) in the McLaughlin group and in 21% (16/73) in the humeral reconstruction group. Conclusions: McLaughlin and anatomic humeral reconstruction lead to similar satisfactory clinical results and a low redislocation rate in the treatment of rHSls. Anatomic humeral reconstruction seems associated with an increased risk of OA progression. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Meniscal allograft transplant (MAT) is an effective treatment for relieving symptoms and improving knee function in patients who experience symptomatic unicompartmental knee pain after a previous meniscectomy. However, the literature contains a paucity of studies assessing the survival rate and prognostic factors of soft tissue MAT. PURPOSE: To report the survivorship of a large, single-center cohort of consecutive patients treated with arthroscopic MAT using soft tissue technique and to investigate variables that could potentially influence failures and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Consecutive MAT procedures totaling 364 performed in a single institution between June 2004 and April 2019 were screened and assessed for eligibility. Subjective clinical scores (Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and visual analog score) were collected preoperatively and at 2, 5, 7, and 10 years of follow-up. Two survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, with surgical failure (defined as any graft revision) and clinical failure (defined as a Lysholm score <65 points) used as endpoints. Univariate analyses were performed using reoperations, surgical failure, clinical failure, and different demographic and surgical characteristics as endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 324 consecutive patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up 5.7 ± 3.0 years. Of these, 189 (58%) underwent an associated surgical procedure. A total of 22 patients (6.8%) were considered to have experienced surgical failure, and no predictors of surgical failure were identified based on the relevant variables. When all patients were considered, a significant improvement in all of the patient-reported outcome measures was present between the preoperative assessment and the last follow-up (P < .001), with no significant decrease over time. Moreover, 70 (21.6%) patients were considered to have experienced clinical failure; the need for concurrent cartilage procedures (odds ratio, 0.16; P = .001) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (odds ratio, 0.40; P = .059) were predictors of failure. Finally, a lower survival rate was reported in female patients compared with male patients (49% vs 69%, respectively; P = .007) and in patients who required cartilage surgery (P = .014). In particular, patients who required cartilage surgery showed nearly half the survival rate compared with those with required no cartilage procedures at 10-year follow-up (36.4% vs 71%, respectively; P = .029). CONCLUSION: Female sex and the need to combine MAT with a cartilage procedure or ACL reconstruction could result in an increased rate of clinical failure at midterm follow-up.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) for patients with symptomatic meniscal loss has demonstrated good clinical results and survivorship. Factors that affect both functional outcome and survivorship have been reported in the literature. These are typically single-centre case series with relatively small numbers and conflicting results. Our aim was to describe an international, two-centre case series, and identify factors that affect both functional outcome and survival. METHODS: We report factors that affect outcome on 526 patients undergoing MAT across two sites (one in the UK and one in Italy). Outcomes of interest were the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score four (KOOS4) at two years and failure rates. We performed multiple regression analysis to examine for factors affecting KOOS, and Cox proportional hazards models for survivorship. RESULTS: Our results indicate that baseline KOOS4 score affects functional outcome at two years, but no other included factors were significantly related to functional outcome. The only factor that affected failure rate was the presence of cartilage lesions down to bone on both the femur and tibia, decreasing the five-year survivorship from 95% (95% confidence interval (CI) 91 to 99) to 84% (95% CI 74 to 94). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest international cohort reporting on MAT. Our results indicate that factors such as age, BMI, and cartilage lesions down to bone on both the femur and tibia of the affected compartment should not present barriers to offering MAT. Baseline KOOS4 score and the presence of bone-on-bone arthritis can be used to help counsel patients regarding the expected risks and rewards of surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):657-662.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a chronic and painful joint condition that can occur from childhood through to adult life. Microtrauma, vascular insufficiency, or abnormal endochondral ossification are the most common causes of OCD. Reconstructive techniques for OCD of the knee are typically necessary when either non-operative or reparative/regenerative operative treatments fail, or when the OCD is irreversible. To analyze the clinical outcomes and failure rates of fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation (FOCA) used as a reconstructive strategy in OCD patients, an in-depth search was carried out on the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases concerning the existing evidence related to the use of FOCA for OCD patients in the knee joint. A total of 646 studies were found through the search and 2 studies were added after a cross-referenced examination of the articles within the bibliography. Six studies with a total of 303 OCD lesions treated with FOCA, with a mean follow-up of 6.3 years, were included. Although a limited number of low-level evidence studies on this topic are available in previous research, satisfactory clinical results and survival rates of the reconstruction are reported. However, to better define the real advantages of FOCA in the healing process of OCD lesions, comparative studies with different techniques are needed.

RESUMEN

A prospective analysis of the effect of autologous adipose derived mesenchymal stem cell (AD-MSCs) therapy in the treatment of a juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (JOCD) of the patella. After failed conventional management of JOCD, a 13-year-old patient undergoes intra-articular MSC therapy. Repeated magnetic resonance imaging analyses showed regeneration of cartilage. In this report, the use of AD-MSCs, after unsuccessful conventional JOCD management, resulted in structural, functional and pain improvement. These results highlight the possibility to avoid surgery treatment in JOCD patella treatment.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Meniscal allograft transplant (MAT) is considered an effective procedure for reducing pain and improving knee function. Nevertheless, the current knowledge regarding the results of MAT is limited to short- to mid-term follow-up studies, especially for arthroscopic techniques. PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes, reoperations, and failures with a minimum follow-up of 10 years after fresh-frozen MAT performed arthroscopically with soft tissue fixation. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 46 patients (age, 36.6 ± 10.6 years; 36 male, 10 female) who underwent medial MAT (n = 27) or lateral MAT (n = 19) with a minimum 10-year follow-up were evaluated with the Lysholm score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale for pain, and Tegner score. Surgical failure was defined as the need for partial or total graft removal (meniscectomy or knee replacement), and clinical failure was defined as the need for partial or total graft removal in addition to a poor Lysholm score (<65 points) at final follow-up. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curve, and clinical scores were analyzed based on the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for MAT. RESULTS: 10-year survival and clinical data were available for 38 patients. Because 6 meniscectomies were required, the rate of survival free from surgical failure was 91% at 5 years and 86% at 10 years. Lower survival was reported in lateral MAT (73%) compared with medial MAT (96%). Because a further 4 patients had poor Lysholm scores, the rate of survival free from surgical and clinical failure was 87% at 5 years and 70% at 10 years. The average Lysholm score at final follow-up was 82 ± 20, and 60% to 82% of patients achieved PASS of the various KOOS subscales. The Tegner score and the KOOS Sport score significantly decreased from mid-term to long-term evaluation (P < .001 and P < .05, respectively). Other KOOS subscales and the Lysholm score remained stable at long-term evaluation. No significant differences were found between isolated MAT or combined MAT regarding subjective scores, surgical failures, or clinical failures. CONCLUSION: Up to 10 years after surgery, 86% of fresh-frozen MATs with soft tissue fixation were still in situ, and satisfactory clinical results were present for about 70% of patients. Decline of clinical outcomes from midterm to long term was noted only in sports-related scores. A higher number of overall reoperations was noted in female patients, whereas a higher risk of failure was present in the patients with lateral MAT.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of age on midterm clinical outcomes and failures of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT), aiming at investigating the efficacy of MAT in patients older than 50 years. METHODS: In this case-control study, data on patients older than 50 years (older MAT [O-MAT] group) with at least 5 years of follow-up and a matched-pair group of patients younger than 30 years of age (younger MAT [Y-MAT] group) were extracted from a database of MAT procedures, performed with arthroscopic implantation of fresh-frozen meniscal allograft without bone plugs. RESULTS: A matched-pair comparative analysis of midterm results and survival between 26 O-MAT patients and 26 Y-MAT patients was performed at a mean follow-up of 7.3 ± 2.2 years. All the clinical scores significantly improved from the baseline values in both the O-MAT and Y-MAT groups although with significantly lower scores in the O-MAT group. Two-thirds of O-MAT patients were able to return to a recreational level of sports activity. Only 2 patients in the O-MAT group underwent knee replacement, but the overall failure rate, also considering a clinical criterion, was 31% in the O-MAT group and 15% in the Y-MAT group (P = .3244). The mean survival time free from replacement or graft removal was 11.6 years in the O-MAT group and 12.3 years in the Y-MAT group (P = .691). CONCLUSIONS: MAT is able to provide symptom relief and functional improvement at midterm follow-up in patients older than 50 years although with inferior results and a higher failure rate compared with those younger than 30 years. MAT can be considered a viable option to treat patients older than 50 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of surgical and nonoperative treatment in patients aged 18 years or younger with traumatic shoulder instability. METHODS: A systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. A complete search of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was performed using various combinations of the keywords "shoulder," "instability," "glenohumeral instability," "pediatric," "adolescent," "skeletally immature," "young," "open physis," "children," "management," "treatment," "surgical," "stabilization," and "recurrence." There was no time restriction. RESULTS: Fifteen articles met our inclusion criteria, including a total of 693 patients with 705 shoulders aged 18 years or younger. Of 411 shoulders, 293 (71.3%) treated with a nonoperative approach experienced a redislocation compared with 55 of 314 shoulders (17.5%) that received surgical treatment. The results of the quantitative synthesis showed that the recurrence rate was significantly lower in the surgical group compared with the nonoperative group. CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence rate is lower in patients undergoing surgical treatment. Further studies are necessary to clarify several points in the treatment of skeletally immature patients with traumatic shoulder instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of Level II and III studies and 1 case series.

Asunto(s)