RESUMEN
In-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation training often happens in silos, with minimal interprofessional training. The aim of this study was to implement and evaluate a simulation-enhanced, interprofessional cardiac arrest curriculum in a university hospital. The curriculum ran monthly for 12 months, training interprofessional teams of internal medicine residents, nurses, respiratory therapists, and pharmacy residents. Teams participated in a 90-min high-fidelity simulation including "code blue" (30 min) followed by a 30-min debriefing and a repeat identical simulated "code blue" scenario. Teams were tested in an unannounced mock Code Blue the following month. Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) algorithm adherence was assessed using a standardized checklist. In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) incidence and survival was tracked for 2 years prior, during, and 1 year after curriculum implementation. Team ACLS-algorithm adherence at baseline varied from 47% to 90% (mean of 71 ± 11%) and improved immediately following training (mean 88 ± 4%, range 80-93%, p = .011). This improvement persisted but decreased in magnitude over 1 month (mean 81 ± 7%, p = .013). Medical resident self-reported comfort levels with resuscitation skills varied widely at baseline, but improved for all skills post-curriculum. This simulation-enhanced, spaced practice, interprofessional curriculum resulted in a sustained improvement in team ACLS algorithm adherence.
Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado , Paro Cardíaco , Humanos , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/educación , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Curriculum , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Evaluación Educacional , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted the ski industry worldwide by closing or limiting access to ski resorts. Subsequently, anecdotal reports of increased backcountry use emerged in the press, with concerns of inexperienced skiers causing or having problems in the backcountry. This study attempted to quantify this and identify motivations for new backcountry skiers. METHODS: Self-identified backcountry skiers and snowboarders (aged ≥18 y) in the United States and Canada completed an anonymous 29-question online survey distributed by regional avalanche centers, education providers, and skiing organizations (n=4792). Respondents were stratified by backcountry experience, defining "newcomers" who began backcountry skiing from 2019 to 2021, coincident with the COVID-19 pandemic. Percentages of ski days spent in the backcountry were compared before and during the COVID-19 pandemic using paired t-tests and across cohorts using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Avalanche education was compared using unpaired χ2 tests. RESULTS: Of established skiers, 81% noticed more people in the backcountry and 27% reported increasing their own use. Participants reported spending 17% (95% CI, 15.8-17.9) more of their days in the backcountry during the COVID-19 pandemic, with newcomers increasing their time spent by 36% and established skiers increasing their time spent by 13% (P<0.0001). Of newcomers, 27% cited the COVID-19 pandemic as motivation to enter the backcountry and 24% lacked formal avalanche education, which is significantly higher than the 14% of established skiers (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Influenced by factors related to COVID-19, reported backcountry use increased during the pandemic. Newcomers had a lower level of avalanche education and less confidence in evaluating terrain. Because 80% of participants were recruited from avalanche safety or education websites, this likely underestimates skiers lacking avalanche awareness or education and is further limited by the nature of online surveys.