RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of Paiteling and CO2 laser therapy on high-risk human papillomavirus. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 558 patients with HR-HPV low-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN1) from 2021 to 2023. Patients were selected and put into two groups: Paiteling and CO2 laser. Out of the 558 patients who were included in our final study, 239 (42.8 %) were treated with Paiteling, and 319 (57.2 %) were treated with CO2 laser vaporization. The mean age was 49.55 ± 12.10 years old. We observed that 27 (4.83 %) were younger than 30 years and 531 (95.1 %) were older than 30 years. We reviewed the patient's results at intervals of 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after each therapy. The results of the recurrence rate, effective viral clearance rate, and the effectiveness of both therapies on low-grade cervical lesions were determined using multivariate and univariate cox-regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to determine the HR-HPV conversion rate of each therapy. RESULTS: The median time for HR-HPV clearance was 6.00 months (95 % CI: 4.26-6.89) in the Paiteling group and 9.00 months (95 % CI: 15.92-22.67) in the CO2 laser group. There was a significant difference between the two groups (χ2 = 25.118, p-Value = 0.000). The HR-HPV clearance rate during 6-12 months for Paiteling and CO2 laser was 100 (55.6 %) and 80 (44.4 %), respectively. The clearance rate for both therapies from 6 to 18 months was statistically significant (6-12 months: p < 0.010, 12-18 months: p < 0.011). The Paiteling HR-HPV negative rate over 24 months 214 (89.5 %) is higher than CO2 laser 176 (55.2 %). Paiteling has a 5.4 % re-infection rate, which is marginally lower than the 5.6 % rate for CO2 lasers. The clearance rate for both therapies from 12 to 18 months [Paiteling: 20 (4.7 %) to 10 (3.6 %) and CO2 laser: 22 (8.4 %) to 15 (4.2 %)] was also significant (p < 0.011). The percentage of persistent Hr-HPV clearance rate for Paiteling patients was higher than carbon dioxide laser vaporization. No severe side effects were reported by the Paiteling patients compared to laser vaporization. This is due to the fact that Paiteling, as a traditional Chinese medicine, is a topical, non-invasive medicine, thus preserving the integrity of the cervix. CONCLUSIONS: Paiteling is an effective noninvasive therapy that can clear persistent HR-HPV associated with cervical low-grade squamous lesions in a relatively shorter period of time compared to CO2 laser ablation.