RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The majority of patients will report pain 12 months after a serious injury. Determining the independent risk factors for pain after serious injury will establish the degree to which high-risk patients can be detected in the acute setting and the viability of early triage to specialist pain services. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of patients following serious injury was conducted. The initial assessment comprised a comprehensive battery of known and possible risk factors for persistent pain. Patients were assessed at 12 months for pain severity and for the presence of chronic pain. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety patients underwent an initial assessment of whom 238 (82%) were followed up at 12 months. At 12 months, 171 (72%) patients reported some pain over the past 24 hours. Thirty-five patients (14.7%) reported chronic pain. Five factors independently predicted the 24-hour pain severity: preinjury physical role function, preinjury employment status, initial 24 hours pain score, higher beliefs in the need for medication, and compensable injury (R(2) = 0.21, P < 0.0001). Four factors predicted the presence of chronic pain at 12 months: not working prior to injury, total Abbreviated Injury Scale, initial pain severity, and initial pain control attitudes (pseudo R(2) = 0.24, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Factors present at the time of injury can allocate patients into high- or low-risk groups. The majority of cases of chronic pain emerging from the high-risk group warrant more intense clinical attention. We recommend recording these factors in discharge documentation as indicators of persistent pain.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Injury is a common initiating event for persistent pain. The presentation of injured patients to hospital represents an opportunity to identify patients at high risk of persistent pain and triage them to early intervention. Although a range of physical, psychological, and social risk factors have been implicated in the transition from acute to persistent pain, these factors have not been tested concurrently in a prospective study. This study aimed to determine the degree to which pain severity at 3 months can be predicted at the time of injury and which independent factors predicted pain severity. DESIGN: A large prospective cohort study was conducted recruiting patients from two trauma hospitals during their acute admission. Patients were assessed with a comprehensive battery of known and possible risk factors for persistent pain. Patients were assessed for pain severity on a visual analog scale over the past 24 hours at 3 months. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety patients were recruited, and 242 were followed up at 3 months. Older age, female gender, past alcohol dependence, lower physical role function, pain severity, amount of morphine equivalents administered on the day of assessment, and pain control attitudes predicted pain severity at 3 months. The variance attributed to these factors was 22%. CONCLUSIONS: Injured patients with a number of these factors may warrant increased monitoring and early triage to specialist pain services.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine concordance between two self-reported measures of puberty: Sexual Maturation Scale (SMS) and Pubertal Development Scale (PDS) and their acceptability to adolescents. METHODS: Participants of a school-based study in grades 5, 7 and 9 were classified into one of 5 pubertal stages using each method. RESULTS: 2864 students (age 9-16 years) participated. Agreement was moderate for males (kappa 0.42, 95% CI 0.39, 0.45) and females (kappa 0.57, 95% CI 0.53, 0.61). Concordance within one stage was excellent (females 97%, males 89%), with discrepancies due to females being classified one stage later on the PDS (26%) and males one stage earlier (32%). There were more missing data for the SMS (13%) than the PDS (4%). CONCLUSIONS: Given the level of concordance and difficulties of using the drawings in a school-based survey, we would recommend the PDS as an alternative to assess pubertal status in epidemiological studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Many school-based research efforts require active parental consent for student participation. Maximizing rates of consent form return and agreement is an important issue, because sample representativeness may be compromised when these rates are low. This article compares two methods for obtaining active parental consent: return of consent forms in the mail versus return by students to their classrooms. The methods were tested in a pilot study of 46 schools (1,058 students), with half of the schools randomly allocated to each of the alternative methods. A hierarchical nonlinear model of consent form return and agreement rates suggests that the student-delivered method is more successful at producing higher rates of consent form return and agreement to participate in the study, after controlling for school-level characteristics. The authors discuss the findings and their implications for other researchers engaged in school-based research with adolescents.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)