RESUMEN
Content validity and reliability of the Brief Assessment of Motor Function (BAMF) Upper Extremity Gross Motor Scale (UEGMS) were evaluated in this prospective, descriptive study. The UEGMS is one of five BAMF ordinal scales designed for quick documentation of gross, fine, and oral motor skill levels. Designed to be independent of age and diagnosis, it is intended for use for infants through young adults. An expert panel of 17 physical therapists and 13 occupational therapists refined the content by responding to a standard questionnaire comprised of questions, which asked whether each item should be included, is clearly worded, should be reordered higher or lower, is functionally relevant, and is easily discriminated. Ratings of content validity exceeded the criterion except for two items, which may represent different perspectives of physical and occupational therapists. The UEGMS was modified using the quantitative and qualitative feedback from the questionnaires. For reliability, five raters scored videotaped motor performances of 10 children. Coefficients for inter-rater (0.94) and intra-rater (0.95) reliability were high. The results provide evidence of content validity and reliability of the UEGMS for the assessment of UEGM skill.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Destreza Motora/diagnóstico , Destreza Motora , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Extremidad Superior , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Consenso , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Locomoción , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Terapia Ocupacional , Especialidad de Fisioterapia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Grabación en VideoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Brief Assessment of Motor Function consists of five 0- to 10-point hierarchical scales designed for rapid assessment of gross, fine, and oral motor skills. We describe the development and evaluation of the two Brief Assessment of Motor Function Oral Motor Scales: Oral Motor Articulation and Oral Motor Deglutition. DESIGN: This validation study employed an expert panel of 28 speech-language pathologists, who rated the Brief Assessment of Motor Function Oral Motor Scales items on a scale from 1 to 4 (disagree to agree) to establish content validity. For reliability, oral motor performances of 18 participants (6 mos-20 yrs) were videotaped to represent a wide range of articulation and deglutition capabilities. Four speech-language pathologists, and 1 undergraduate and 10 graduate speech-language pathology students rated the participants' taped samples using the Brief Assessment of Motor Function Oral Motor Scales. RESULTS: All items on the content validity questionnaire had average agreement scores that exceeded criteria, except two, which were not clearly worded; these were clarified. Interrater and intrarater reliability values were 0.997 and 0.986 for the Oral Motor Articulation Scale and 0.977 and 0.997 for the Oral Motor Deglutition Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Expert feedback and reliability procedures suggest that the Brief Assessment of Motor Function Oral Motor Articulation and Deglutition Scales represent the content that they are designed to assess and are reliable for rapid assessment of oral motor skills.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Destreza Motora , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos del Habla/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The Brief Assessment of Motor Function Fine Motor Scale (FMS) allows rapid assessment, independent of age. This study was done to establish content validity of the FMS and to demonstrate FMS reliability. METHODS: A standard questionnaire ("Disagree" to "Agree," 1-4) was emailed to 28 expert panel members. Ten children with diagnoses including Proteus, Sheldon-Freeman, Smith-Lemli-Opitz, and Smith-Magenis syndromes were videotaped for reliability trials. RESULTS: Expert panel members agreed that all 28 items should be included (means, 3.43-3.89); were functionally relevant (means, 2.93-3.82), were clearly worded (means, 2.71-3.61), and were easily discriminated (means, 3.32-4.0). Kappa values for interrater and intrarater reliability were 0.978 and 0.993, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Feedback from an expert Panel supported content validity of the Brief Assessment of Motor Function FMS. Kappa values for interrater and intrarater reliability suggest this is a reliable instrument for rapid, objective fine motor assessment.