Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Pediatr ; 21(9): 961-7, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24726672

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Tracheal intubation in neonates is a painful procedure performed daily in the delivery room despite the widespread development of noninvasive ventilation. Specific analgesia is not commonly performed. The objective of this observational study was to compare practices between two level-III centers: one with a specific protocol for premedication before tracheal intubation of newborns in the delivery room, the other without. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen neonates were intubated in the delivery room and included over a 4-month period: 25% of them received specific premedication before intubation, exclusively in the center with the protocol. None of the extreme premature neonates (age≤28 gestational weeks) received analgosedation before the procedure. Nalbuphine, midazolam, and sufentanil were mainly used, via the intravenous or intrarectal route. Infants receiving a premedication were significantly heavier and had a greater gestational age than the others (1500 g [range, 1180-2260 g] vs. 1170 [range, 860-1680 g] P=0.003, and 31 GW [range, 29-34 GW] vs. 29 [range, 27-32 GW] P=0.014, respectively). Most pediatricians (85-100%) favored a specific protocol for sedation before tracheal intubation. Implementation of a specific protocol allows specific analgesia to be implemented for newborns undergoing tracheal intubation. Further studies should be conducted to determine the best strategies for pain management during tracheal intubation of neonates, especially in the delivery room.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos Clínicos , Salas de Parto , Intubación Intratraqueal , Dolor/prevención & control , Premedicación , Peso Corporal , Francia , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria del Recién Nacido/terapia
2.
Leukemia ; 18(9): 1518-21, 2004 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15269785

RESUMEN

We previously showed that arsenic trioxide (ATO) and melarsoprol may inhibit the growth of multiple myeloma (MM) cells in vitro and in vivo. We report here the administration of arsenic derivatives in 12 relapsing or refractory secretory MM patients. A total of 10 patients received ATO (eight in a continuous schedule, two discontinuously) and two received melarsoprol. The melarsoprol arm was prematurely closed due to toxicity. In the ATO arm, median duration of treatment was 38 days (9-54). Hepatic toxicity was grade 3 and 2 in one and eight patients, respectively. Other toxicities included neuropathy (n=2, grade 2), encephalitis (n=1, grade 3) and leuconeutropenia (n=4, grade 3). At 2 weeks after treatment initiation, mean serum concentration of arsenic was 1.11+/-0.16 micromol/l. No complete or partial remission was observed. A minor response (25-49% reduction of M protein in serum) and a stabilization of the M-protein level were observed in three and four patients, respectively. After ATO discontinuation, these responses were of short duration in all cases. ATO as a single agent did not produce any significant response in advanced MM patients despite sufficient arsenic exposure. Strategies to improve biodistribution, pharmacokinetic and efficacy of the drug as well as treatment combinations are needed.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Arsenicales/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Óxidos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Trióxido de Arsénico , Arsenicales/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/sangre , Óxidos/administración & dosificación , Terapia Recuperativa
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA