RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) originates from the mesothelial and subcutaneous cells of the abdominal cavity. Its diagnose is difficult due to its nonspecific and vague symptoms, and it should be differentiated from alcoholic cirrhosis and liver and pancreatic cancers. Misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis can easily occur when MPM presents with other diseases. To the best of our knowledge, no case of MPM concurrent with alcoholic cirrhosis has been reported. CASE SUMMARY: A 63-year-old man presented to our hospital with abdominal distension for 20days. He had a history of alcohol consumption for nearly 30 years and no history of special drug use or toxic exposure. After treatment for alcoholic cirrhosis in a community hospital, his symptoms did not improve significantly. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy and surgical resection. Pathologic examination showed an epithelioid MPM. He was treated with chemotherapy and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion after surgery. Currently, he is in a stable condition and tumor recurrence has not occurred. CONCLUSION: Misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis of MPM can easily occur because of its insidious onset. Therefore, there is a need to understand. MPM in clinical practice, make the correct diagnosis, and provide timely and effective treatment.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Objectively diagnosing non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) is still a challenge. We aimed to evaluate the use of in-vivo confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) to examine the microalterations of the esophagus in patients with NERD and its relationship with reflux episodes monitored by multiple intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH). METHODS: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms completed reflux disease questionnaires. NERD was determined by negative gastroscopy. Patients without reflux symptoms were recruited as controls. Pilot clinical study was followed by prospective controlled blinded study. All subjects were examined by white-light mode of the endoscopy followed by the standard CLE mode and then MII-pH monitoring. The microalterations seen on CLE images and the correlation between CLE features and reflux episodes were evaluated, the correlation between CLE and transmission electron microscope (TEM) data was also analyzed. RESULTS: On CLE images, NERD patients had more intrapapillary capillary loops (IPCLs) per image than did controls (8.29 ± 3.52 vs. 5.69 ± 2.31, P=0.010), as well as the diameter of IPCLs (19.48 ± 3.13 vs. 15.87 ± 2.21 µm, P=0.041) and intercellular spaces of squamous cells (3.40 ± 0.82 vs. 1.90 ± 0.53 µm, P=0.042). The receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that IPCLs number (optimal cutoff >6 per image, area under the curve (AUC) 0.722, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.592-0.853, sensitivity 67.7%, specificity 71.6%), IPCLs diameter (optimal cutoff >17.2 µm, AUC 0.847, 95% CI 0.747-0.947, sensitivity 81%, specificity 76%), and the intercellular spaces of squamous cells (optimal cutoff >2.40 µm, AUC 0.935, 95% CI 0.875-0.995, sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 90.5%) diagnosed NERD with reasonable accuracy. Combined features of dilatation of intercellular space plus increased IPCLs provided 100% specificity in the diagnosis of NERD patients. The intercellular spaces of squamous cells observed on CLE were highly related to that on TEM findings (r=0.75, P<0.001). Multivariate progressive regression analysis showed that acidic reflux, especially in the supine position, was related to the increased number and dilation of IPCLs in the squamous epithelium (ß=0.063, t=2.895, P=0.038 and ß=0.156, t=1.023, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: CLE represents a useful and potentially significant improvement over standard endoscopy to examine the microalterations of the esophagus in vivo. Acidic reflux is responsible for the microalterations in the esophagus of patients with NERD.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acriflavine is one of the commonly used staining agents in confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), a newly developed technique allows for real time histological observation of gastrointestinal mucosa, but the concentration is not unified. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of acriflavine with different concentrations on the CLE image quality and to find a sound concentration in clinical practice. METHODS: Twenty four consecutive patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal CLE were enrolled into this study. The patients randomly accepted acriflavine in four different concentrations which were the conventional 0.05% and 3 lower ones respectively: 0.02%, 0.01% and 0.005% spraying onto the same focal antrum mucosa during CLE procedures. Differences of Image quality were demonstrated by an objective score system. RESULTS: THERE WAS NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE ABOUT IMAGE QUALITY AMONG ACRIFLAVINE CONCENTRATIONS: 0.05%, 0.02% and 0.01%, but 0.005% decreased image quality significantly (P=0.012). And 0.005% was also the only one which decreased general assessment significantly (P=0.01). For the 3 diagnostic value assessment indices, there was no significant difference about nonspecific and even staining, while 0.02% showed significant better polar staining (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Acriflavine concentration 0.02% is the best one applied in CLE with the best nuclei staining ability and preserved image quality.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The identification of gastric superficial cancerous lesions based on conventional white-light endoscopy (WLE) is challenging, and histological analysis remains the 'gold standard' for the final diagnosis. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) can provide in vivo histological observation without the need for biopsy. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate CLE imaging criteria for gastric superficial cancerous lesions and to compare the diagnostic value of real-time integrated CLE (iCLE) and WLE alone in distinguishing gastric superficial cancerous lesions. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China. PATIENTS: A total of 182 patients were enrolled into phase I and 1786 patients were enrolled into phase II. INTERVENTIONS: CLE images were blindly evaluated after endoscopy in phase I, and real-time iCLE diagnosis during endoscopy was compared with WLE diagnosis by using histopathology as a gold standard in phase II. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The validity and reliability of the CLE diagnosis for identifying gastric superficial cancerous lesions. RESULTS: Off-line CLE diagnosis for early gastric cancers had a high sensitivity (88.1%) and specificity (98.6%). When the two-tiered CLE classification of non-cancerous lesions and cancer/high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) lesions was introduced, CLE diagnosis led to a higher sensitivity (90.2%) and specificity (98.5%) (phase I). Real-time iCLE diagnosis had a higher sensitivity (88.9%), specificity (99.3%) and accuracy (98.8%) for gastric superficial cancer/HGIN lesions than WLE diagnosis (sensitivity, 72.2%; specificity, 95.1%; and accuracy, 94.1%) (p < 0.05) (phase II). Limitations This was a single-centre study. CONCLUSIONS: CLE can be used to identify gastric superficial cancer/HGIN lesions with high validity and reliability.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)