Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 207: 116787, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39146714

RESUMEN

An intercomparison exercise on "microplastics in sediment" was carried out by five laboratories using samples collected in the Bay of Marseille in September 2021. The results from different extraction and identification methods varied depending on the type and size classes of MPs, and was better than 80 % for the size class >300 µm and for the fragments. The variability in recovery rates can be attributed to the choice of reagents and extraction protocols. Recovery rates per laboratory were between 47 % and 113 % and the use of ZnCl2 and NaI increased recovery rates by an average of 70 %. The lowest recovery rates (47 and 53 %) were attributed to the reference methods (FTIR and LDIR), conversely the highest (80 and 87 %) were attributed to identification by Nile Red. The average ranged between 23 and 53 items /50 g d.w. with decreases offshore and at greater depth.


Asunto(s)
Bahías , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Sedimentos Geológicos , Microplásticos , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua , Sedimentos Geológicos/química , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Microplásticos/análisis , Francia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA