RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In the emergency department (ED), triage significantly impacts patient safety. Therefore, triage nurses must make decisions accurately and timeously. This study aims to investigate how South Korean pediatric emergency nurses perceive urgency and classify severity using the Q methodology, which examines individuals' subjectivity. METHODS: We collected 84 statements from a Q population based on a literature review and interviews and selected 33 Q samples. The P samples included 30 pediatric emergency nurses at a Seoul tertiary care hospital. The principal component factor analysis method was used to analyze data using the PC-QUANL program. RESULTS: Four urgency perception types were identified among pediatric ED nurses-Type 1: "Experiential coping"; Type 2: "Careful reasoning"; Type 3: "Patient-centered thinking"; and Type 4: "Intuitive prediction." These types appear to be an integrated process of knowledge and clinical experience that considers children's characteristics and developmental stages. CONCLUSION: This study may serve as a basis for future education to improve pediatric ED nurses' urgency judgment and severity classification skills.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients can develop septic shock at any time. Therefore, it is important to identify septic patients in hospital wards and rapidly perform the optimal treatment. Although the sepsis bundle has already been reported to improve survival rates, the controversy over evidence of the effect of in-hospital sepsis continues to exist. We aimed to estimate the outcomes and bundle compliance of patients with septic shock in hospital wards managed through the rapid response system (RRS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 976 patients with septic shock managed through the RRS at an academic, tertiary care hospital in Korea from 2008 to 2017. RESULTS: Of the 976 enrolled patients, the compliance of each sepsis bundle was high (80.8-100.0%), but the overall success rate of the bundle was low (58.3%). The compliance rate for achieving the overall sepsis bundle increased from 26.5% to 70.0%, and the 28-day mortality continuously decreased from 50% to 32.1% over 10 years. We analyzed the two groups according to whether they completed the overall sepsis bundle or not. Of the 976 enrolled patients, 569 (58.3%) sepsis bundles were completed, whereas 407 (41.7%) were incomplete. The complete bundle group showed lower 28-day mortality than the incomplete bundle group (37.1% vs. 53.6%, p < 0.001). In the multivariate multiple logistic regression model, the 28-day mortality was significantly associated with the complete bundle (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.61; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.40-0.91; p = 0.017). The obtaining of blood cultures (adjusted OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.33-0.63; p < 0.001) and lactate re-measurement (adjusted OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.95; p = 0.024) in each component of the sepsis bundle were associated with the 28-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid response system provides improving sepsis bundle compliances and survival in patients with septic shock in hospital wards.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rapid response system has been implemented in many hospitals worldwide and, reportedly, the timing of medical emergency team (MET) attendance in relation to the duration of hospitalization is associated with the mortality of MET patients. We evaluated the relationship between duration of hospitalization before MET activation and patient mortality. We compared cases of MET activation for early, intermediate, and late deterioration to patient characteristics, activation characteristics, and patient outcomes. We also aimed to determine the relationship, after adjusting for confounders, between the duration of hospitalization before MET activation and patient mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients who triggered MET activation in general wards from March 2009 to February 2015 at the Asan Medical Center in Seoul. Patients were categorized as those with early deterioration (less than 2 days after admission), intermediate deterioration (2-7 days after admission), and late deterioration (more than 7 days after admission) and compared them to patient characteristics, activation characteristics, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 7114 patients were included. Of these, 1793 (25.2%) showed early deterioration, 2113 (29.7%) showed intermediate deterioration, and 3208 (45.1%) showed late deterioration. Etiologies of MET activation were similar among these groups. The clinical outcomes significantly differed among the groups (intensive care unit transfer: 34.1%, 35.6%, and 40.4%; p < 0.001 and mortality: 26.3%, 31.5%, and 41.2%; p < 0.001 for early, intermediate, and late deterioration, respectively). Compared with early deterioration and adjusted for confounders, the odds ratio of mortality for late deterioration was 1.68 (1.46-1.93). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 50% of the acute clinically-deteriorating patients who activated the MET had been hospitalized for more than 7 days. Furthermore, they presented with higher rates of mortality and ICU transfer than patients admitted for less than 7 days before MET activation and had mortality as an independent risk factor.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a newly developed risk stratification tool, which has been presented along with a new sepsis definition, to classify infected patients outside of the intensive care unit (ICU). We evaluated the clinical usefulness of qSOFA for predicting adverse outcomes in sepsis patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess the utility of qSOFA in sepsis patients with liver cirrhosis for whom medical emergency teams (METs) were activated in general wards at an academic tertiary care hospital between March 2008 and December 2015. qSOFA, Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), modified early warning score (MEWS), and sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were calculated according to data at MET activation. RESULTS: Of 188 patients, 69 (36.7%) had a qSOFA score of 0 or 1 point and 119 (63.3%) had ≥ 2 points. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for ICU transfer on the SOFA (AUROC, 0.691; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.615 to 0.767) or MEWS (AUROC, 0.663; 95% CI, 0.586 to 0.739) were significantly higher compared to those for qSOFA (AUROC, 0.589; 95% CI, 0.507 to 0.671) or SIRS (AUROC, 0.533; 95% CI, 0.451 to 0.616). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that qSOFA score may have limited utility in predicting adverse outcomes in sepsis patients with liver cirrhosis at MET activation. Either MEWS or another screening tool is needed for detecting early sepsis in these patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of the follow-up programme implemented by the Asan Medical Center Medical Emergency Team (MET). METHOD: A quasi-experimental pre-post intervention design was used, retrospectively reviewed. The follow-up programme includes respiratory care, regular visits and communication between the attending doctors and MET nurse for patients discharged from the medical intensive care unit (MICU) to the general ward. This programme has been implemented since February 2013. Outcomes of patients before and at 1 year after the introduction of the programme were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 1229 patients were enrolled and divided two groups (Before, n = 624; After the introduction of the programme, n = 625). Forty-six patients (3.7%) were readmitted to the ICU within 72 hours, and there was no significant difference found between the two groups (3.7% versus 3.7%, P = 0.996). Respiratory distress was the most common reason for readmission (67.4%). Cardiac arrest developed in four (0.6%) Before patients; whereas, no cardiac arrest occurred in the After group (0.0%, P = 0.062) cases. A total of 223 patients were discharged to the step-down units. The SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) score was significantly higher in the step-down unit patients than general ward patients (4.9 ± 2.8 versus 6.2 ± 3.1, P = 0.000). In the analysis restricted to patients discharged to step-down units, unplanned ICU readmissions significantly decreased in the After group (9.3% versus 2.6%, P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the MET follow-up programme did not change the rate of ICU readmission and cardiac arrest; however, its introduction was associated with the reduced ICU readmission of the high-risk patient populations discharged to the step-down unit.

Asunto(s)