RESUMEN
The objective of this study was to assess risk factors and the outcome of breakthrough fungaemias (BFs) occurring during fluconazole (FLU) therapy in non-cancer and non-HIV individuals. Thirty-three fungaemias occurring during therapy with FLU among a total of 310 fungaemias observed within a 10-y national survey were analysed. The agar disk diffusion method was used for antifungal susceptibility testing and the Vitek system for species identification. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine risk factors for BF. All BFs were due to species known to be susceptible to FLU: Candida albicans (25/33), C. parapsilosis (6/33) and C. guillermondii (2/33). The mean number of positive blood cultures per episode was 2.4. The MIC of Candida spp. to FLU was 0.5-8 mg/ml (all strains were susceptible in vitro). Neonatal age (< 4 weeks), very low birth weight, prior surgery, central venous catheter placement, artificial ventilation, total parenteral nutrition and C. parapsilosis were significantly related to BF in univariate analysis, but only central venous catheter placement was significantly related in multivariate analysis. However, the outcome of BFs and non-BFs was similar. All BFs occurred in non-HIV patients who were not previously treated with azoles, and were caused by in vitro FLU-susceptible species (C. albicans and C. tropicalis). Thus factors other than in vitro susceptibility play a role in BFs.
Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Candida/efectos de los fármacos , Candidiasis/microbiología , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Fungemia/microbiología , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Candida/clasificación , Candidiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Micosis/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Over a 10-y period (1989-99) we prospectively evaluated all patients with fungaemia among 16,555 admissions (21,004 blood cultures) at a national cancer referral institution in the Slovak Republic. A prospective protocol was completed on 140 patients with fungaemia, which was then analysed in terms of aetiology, clinical characteristics, potential risk factors and outcome. The most frequently isolated organism was C. albicans, in 75 patients (52.9%), followed by non-albicans Candida spp. in 45 patients (32.1%). Non-Candida spp. yeasts represented 16 episodes in 16 patients (11.4%). Moulds caused 4 episodes in 4 patients (3.6% of all fungaemias) and all were caused by Fusarium spp. Mucositis (p = 0.025), > or = 3 positive blood cultures (p = 0.02), acute leukaemia (p = 0.00001), neutropenia (p = 0.0015), quinolone prophylaxis (p < 0.000005) and breakthrough fungaemia (p = 0.004) during prophylaxis with fluconazole (p = 0.03) and itraconazole (p = 0.005) were significantly more associated with non-Candida than C. albicans spp. Furthermore, attributable mortality was higher in the subgroup of non-Candida than C. albicans spp. (50.0 vs. 18.7%, p < 0.02). The only independent risk factor for inferior outcome was antifungal therapy of < 10 d duration (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval, p < 0.001). Aetiology, neutropenia and mucositis were not independent risk factors for higher mortality in multivariate analysis; however, they were risk factors for inferior outcome in univariate analysis (p < 0.05-0.005).
Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Fungemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fungemia/microbiología , Hongos/aislamiento & purificación , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Adolescente , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Fungemia/mortalidad , Fungemia/prevención & control , Hongos/clasificación , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Bacteriemia due to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) resistant to methicillin and sensitive only to glycopeptides in 220 cancer patients was prospectively analyzed for risk factors and outcome. A group of 33 cases of bacteriemia with CNS-sensitive only to glycopeptides was compared with a group of 187 cases with CNS sensitive to methicillin. All cases appeared in two affiliated major cancer institutes in Bratislava with the same antibiotic policy. Univariate analysis showed differences in recorded risk factors: acute leukemia (48 vs. 33%, P < 0.05), neutropenia (57 vs. 32%, P < 0.045), previous prophylaxis with quinolones (30 vs. 11%, P < 0.01) and penicillin-V (15 vs. 3%, P < 0.02) and previous colonisation with CNS (27 vs. 3%, P < 0.01) were more frequently associated with bacteriemia resistant to methicillin and sensitive only to glycopeptides. Attributable mortality was also higher in this subgroup in comparison to bacteriemias with CNS sensitive to methicillin (12 vs. 3%, P < 0.05) however, overall mortality was similar. Bacteriemias due to CNS caused by sensitivity only to glycopeptides occurred more frequently in neutropenic patients (1), with acute leukemia (2), receiving quinolone and penicillin prophylaxis (3), and previously colonized (4), patients and had worse prognosis in comparison to those with methicillin-sensitive staphylococcal bacteriemias.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Neutropenia/etiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/etiología , Humanos , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Neutropenia/epidemiología , Neutropenia/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/etiología , Staphylococcus epidermidisRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the outcome of inappropriately treated cancer patients with documented bacteremia. DESIGN/SETTING: 95 cases of inappropriately treated bacteremias in febrile cancer patients in a tertiary-care center were analyzed and compared with a group of appropriately treated bacteremias to assess risk factors for inappropriate therapy and outcome. RESULTS: Among 285 bacteremias, 95 (33.3%) were not treated appropriately, with 42 receiving the wrong antibiotics and 17 having too short a therapeutic course of appropriate antibiotics. In 13, therapy was delayed for more than 48 hours after the onset of fever. Twenty-three patients did not receive antibiotic therapy at all despite bacteremia. A group of 95 inappropriately treated bacteremias was compared to 190 appropriately treated bacteremias occurring in the same period. Microbiological cure after the initial course of therapy was achieved more often (76.8% vs 38.9%, P < .001) in the group of appropriately treated bacteremias in all cases and also in the subgroup of leukemic patients (P < .01). Overall and attributable mortality were significantly lower in patients who were treated appropriately. There was no difference in the number of antibiotics administered in appropriately versus inappropriately treated bacteremias. Cost of therapy between both groups was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriately treated bacteremic cancer patients had outcomes that were significantly worse than patients who were treated appropriately. The reasons for inappropriate therapy were selection of the wrong antimicrobials, too short a duration of therapy, delayed onset of therapy, or absence of antimicrobial therapy.