RESUMEN

Human-in-the-loop (HIL) optimization is a control paradigm used for tuning the control parameters of human-interacting devices while accounting for variability among individuals. A limitation of state-of-the-art HIL optimization algorithms such as Bayesian Optimization (BO) is that they assume that the relationship between control parameters and user response does not change over time. BO can be modified to account for the dynamics of the user response by implementing time into the kernel function, a method known as Dynamic Bayesian Optimization (DBO). However, it is unknown if DBO outperforms BO when the human response is characterized by models of human motor learning. In this work, we simulated runs of HIL optimization using BO and DBO towards establishing if DBO is a suitable paradigm for HIL optimization in the presence of motor learning. Simulations were conducted assuming either purely time-dependent participant responses, or assuming that responses would arise from state-space models of motor learning capable of describing both adaptation and use-dependent learning behavior. Statistical comparisons indicated that DBO was never inferior to BO, and, after a certain number of iterations, generally outperformed BO in convergence to optimal inputs and outputs. The number of iterations beyond which DBO was superior to BO occurred earlier when the input-output relationship of the simulated responses was more dynamic. Our results suggest that DBO may improve the performance of HIL optimization over BO when a sufficient number of iterations can be evaluated to accurately distinguish between unstructured variability (noise) and learning.