RESUMEN
Background Vascularized bone grafting with screw fixation is currently considered the treatment of choice for scaphoid nonunions with avascular necrosis (AVN) of the proximal pole. A viable alternative to using vascularized bone grafts for scaphoid nonunions with AVN is nonvascularized bone grafting with screw fixation. Question What are the functional outcomes of patients with scaphoid nonunions and associated proximal pole AVN who are treated with nonvascularized distal radius bone grafting and screw fixation? Patients and Methods Eight scaphoid nonunions with AVN, which received nonvascularized distal radius bone graft and screw fixation, underwent a retrospective review. Range of motion, strength, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were obtained. Follow-up X-rays were compared with immediate postoperative X-rays. Results At a mean follow-up of 88.9 months, thumb palmar abduction and radial abduction were significantly higher on the operative side ( p = 0.28 and 0.49, respectively). Extension/flexion arc was significantly lower in the operative wrist ( p = 0.148). There was no significant difference between the operative and nonoperative sides with regard to strength. The median postoperative DASH score was 2.9 (interquartile range [IQR]: 8.3). There was no progression of osteoarthritis when immediate postoperative and follow-up X-rays were compared. Radiographic union was observed in six of the seven (85.7%) patients who were able to return to the office for follow-up radiographs. The mean scapholunate and radioscaphoid angles measured on X-rays were within normal anatomic range postoperatively. Conclusions Using nonvascularized distal radius bone graft and screw fixation in the treatment of scaphoid nonunions with associated AVN has favorable radiologic and functional outcomes and should be considered a viable treatment option for this difficult problem.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An ideal peripheral nerve repair construct does not currently exist. Our primary goal was to determine whether fibrin glue adds to the tensile strength of conduit-assisted primary digital nerve repairs. Our secondary goal was to evaluate the impact of varying suture number and location on the tensile strength. METHODS: Ninety cadaveric digital nerves were harvested and divided equally into the following repair groups: A (4/4), B (2/2), C (0/2), D (0/1), and E (0/0) with the first number referring to the number of sutures at the coaptation and the second number referring to the number of sutures at each proximal and distal end of the nerve-conduit junction. When fibrin glue was added, the group was labeled prime. The nerve specimens were transected and then repaired with 8-0 nylon suture and conduit. The tensile strength of the repairs was tested, and maximum failure load was determined. The results were analyzed with a 2-way analysis of variance. The Tukey post hoc test compared repair groups if the 2-way analysis of variance showed significance. RESULTS: Both suture group and glue presence significantly affected the maximum failure load. Increasing the number of sutures increased the maximum failure load, and the presence of fibrin glue also increased the failure load. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrin glue was found to increase the strength of conduit-assisted primary digital nerve repairs. Furthermore, the number of sutures correlated to the strength of the repair. Fibrin glue may be added to a conduit-assisted primary digital nerve repair to maintain strength and allow fewer sutures at the primary coaptation site.