Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
ESMO Open ; 9(8): 103647, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39232586

RESUMEN

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC), published in late 2022 were adapted in December 2023, according to established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with BTC. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with BTC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and the Taiwan Oncology Society (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different regions of Asia. Drug access and reimbursement in the different regions of Asia are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with BTC across the different countries and regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices and molecular profiling, as well as age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different countries.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar , Humanos , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/terapia , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/epidemiología , Oncología Médica/normas , Asia/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sociedades Médicas
2.
ESMO Open ; 8(1): 100746, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36527823

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Initial dose adjustment is recommended for patients with known UGT1A1∗28 homozygosity for both conventional irinotecan and liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI). A recent population pharmacokinetic (PK) study showed that Asian patients had a lower prevalence of UGT1A1∗28 homozygosity but a significantly higher maximum blood concentration of SN-38 (SN-38 Cmax) and a higher incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia after nal-IRI administration than Caucasian patients. The current study investigated the association of UGT1A1 polymorphisms, including the Asian prevalent UGT1A1∗6, PK and toxicities of nal-IRI-based therapy in the Asian population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 162 patients with nal-IRI-based therapy and available UGT1A1∗6 and UGT1A1∗28 genotyping were included, with 82 Asian patients from six previous phase I or II studies of nal-IRI (cohort 1) and another 80 patients with nal-IRI + 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin every 2 weeks as real-world practice in a single institute in Taiwan (cohort 2). RESULTS: The frequency of UGT1A1∗6 or UGT1A1∗28 homozygosity/compound heterozygosity was 9.3%, with UGT1A1∗6/∗6 in 2.5%, UGT1A1∗28/∗28 in 1.9% and UGT1A1∗6/∗28 in 4.9%. Among the 53 patients in cohort 1 with available PK data, all 7 patients with homozygosity/compound heterozygosity harbored UGT1A1∗6 and had a significantly higher level of median dose-normalized area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and Cmax of SN-38 than those with single heterozygosity/wild type. Of the entire study population, the incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia and diarrhea was significantly higher in patients with homozygosity/compound heterozygosity than in those with single heterozygosity/wild type, 73.3% versus 38.1% (P = 0.012, Fisher's exact test) and 33.3% versus 9.5% (P = 0.018, Fisher's exact test), respectively. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the recommendation of a lower starting dose of nal-IRI for patients with UGT1A1∗28 homozygosity should be extended to include patients with UGT1A1∗6 homozygosity/compound heterozygosity.


Asunto(s)
Camptotecina , Neutropenia , Humanos , Irinotecán , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Genotipo , Polimorfismo Genético , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 75(3): 579-86, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25577133

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of PEP02, a novel liposome-encapsulated irinotecan, in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in cohorts of one to three to receive escalating dose of PEP02 in a phase I trial. PEP02, from 60 to 180 mg/m(2), was given as a 90-min intravenous infusion, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were enrolled into three dose levels: 60 (one patient), 120 (six patients) and 180 mg/m(2) (four patients). DLT was observed in three patients, one at 120 mg/m(2) (grade 3 catheter-related infection) and two at 180 mg/m(2) (grade 4 neutropenia lasting for >3 days in one, grade 4 hematological toxicities and grade 4 diarrhea in the other). MTD was determined as 120 mg/m(2). Comparing with those after free-form irinotecan in the literature, the dose-normalized PK of SN-38 (the active metabolite) after PEP02 was characterized by lower C max, prolonged terminal half-life and higher AUC but with significant inter-individual variation. One patient who died of treatment-related toxicity had significantly higher C max and AUC levels of SN-38 than those of the other three patients at 180 mg/m(2). Post hoc pharmacogenetic study showed that the patient had a combined heterozygosity genotype of UGT1A1*6/*28. Two patients had objective tumor response. CONCLUSIONS: PEP02 apparently modified the PK parameters of irinotecan and SN-38 by liposome encapsulation. The MTD of PEP02 monotherapy at 3-week interval is 120 mg/m(2), which will be the recommended dose for future studies.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Glucuronosiltransferasa/genética , Nanopartículas , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/farmacocinética , Área Bajo la Curva , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/farmacocinética , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Genotipo , Semivida , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Irinotecán , Liposomas , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/patología , Farmacogenética , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Ann Oncol ; 26(5): 943-949, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25632066

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous clinical trials have not proved that adding epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors to chemotherapy confers a survival benefit for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC). Whether the KRAS mutation status of tumor cells confounded the results of past studies is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ABTC patients stratified by KRAS status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and primary tumor location were randomized 1 : 1 to receive GEMOX (800 mg/m(2) gemcitabine and 85 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin) or C-GEMOX (500 mg/m(2) cetuximab plus GEMOX) every 2 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The study enrolled 122 patients between December 2010 and May 2012 (62 treated with C-GEMOX and 60 with GEMOX). Compared with GEMOX alone, C-GEMOX was associated with trend to better ORR (27% versus 15%; P = 0.12) and progression-free survival (PFS, 6.7 versus 4.1 months; P = 0.05), but not overall survival (OS, 10.6 versus 9.8 months; P = 0.91). KRAS mutations, which were detected in 36% of tumor samples, did not affect the trends of difference in ORR and PFS between C-GEMOX and GEMOX. The two treatment arms had similar adverse events, except that more patients had skin rashes, allergic reactions, and neutropenia in the C-GEMOX arm. Of patients with C-GEMOX, the presence of a grade 2 or 3 skin rash was associated with significantly better ORR, PFS, and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of cetuximab did not significantly improve the ORR of GEMOX chemotherapy in ABTC, although a trend of PFS improvement was observed. The trend of improvement did not correlate with KRAS mutation status. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01267344). All patients gave written informed consent.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Cetuximab/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Mutación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/genética , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/patología , Cetuximab/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Fenotipo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Taiwán , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA