RESUMEN

Although tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) have been evaluated in various clinical trials, limited safety and efficacy data exist in real-world settings. The goal of this retrospective analysis is to assess changes in virological suppression, immunological status, renal function, weight and body mass index (BMI) amongst people living with HIV who switched from a TDF-based to a TAF-based regimen. Of 130 patients included in the final analysis, 53 patients experienced an increase in their viral load upon switching from TDF to TAF therapy whilst 62 patients remained undetectable. For those who experienced a viral blip, 33 (62%) resuppressed by the time of last follow-up, 15 (28%) patients did not have additional labs beyond the last follow-up and concern for failure occurred in 5 (9%) patients. No differences in immunological function, renal function, weight or BMI were observed from before switching to the last follow-up. Although a loss of virological suppression was found upon switching to TAF at subsequent follow-up visits, resuppression ultimately occurred in most patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) experience high rates of medication-related errors when admitted to the inpatient setting. Data are lacking on the impact of a combined antiretroviral (ARV) stewardship and transitions of care (TOC) program. We investigated the impact of a pharmacist-driven ARV stewardship and TOC program in persons with HIV. METHODS: This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental analysis evaluating the impact of an HIV-trained clinical pharmacist on hospitalized persons with HIV. Patients included in the study were adults following up, or planning to follow up, at the University of Illinois (UI) outpatient clinics for HIV care and admitted to the University of Illinois Hospital. Data were collected between July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 for the preimplementation phase and between July 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018 for the postimplementation phase. Primary and secondary endpoints included medication error rates related to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and opportunistic infection (OI) medications, all-cause readmission rates, medication access at time of hospital discharge, and linkage to care rates. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were included in the study: 60 in the preimplementation phase and 68 in the postimplementation phase. After the implementation of this program, medication error rates associated with ART and OI medications decreased from 17% (10 of 60) to 6% (4 of 68) (P = .051), 30-day all-cause readmission rates decreased significantly from 27% (16 of 60) to 12% (8 of 68) (P = .03), and linkage to care rates increased significantly from 78% (46 of 59) to 92% (61 of 66) (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacist-led ARV stewardship and TOC program improved overall care of persons with HIV through reduction in medication error rates, all-cause readmission rates, and an improvement in linkage to care rates.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Based on a retrospective study performed at our institution, 38% of inpatients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were found to have a medication error involving their anti-retroviral (ARV) and/or opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis medications. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of a dedicated HIV-trained clinical pharmacist on the ARV and OI prophylaxis medication error rates at our institution. METHODS: A prospective quality improvement project was conducted over a six month period to assess the impact of a dedicated HIV-trained clinical pharmacist on the ARV and OI prophylaxis medication error rates. IRB approval received. RESULTS: There were 144 patients included in this analysis, who experienced a combined 76 medication errors. Compared to historical control study conducted at our institution, the percent of patients who experienced a medication error remained stable (38% vs. 39%, respectively) and the error rate per patient was similar (1.44 vs. 1.36, p=NS). The percent of medication errors that were corrected prior to discharge increased from 24% to 70% and the median time to error correction decreased from 42 hours to 11.5 hours (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Errors relating to ARV or OI prophylaxis medications remain frequent in inpatient people living with HIV/AIDS. After multiple interventions were implemented, ARV and OI prophylaxis medication errors were corrected faster and with greater frequency prior to discharge, however, similar rates of errors for patients existed. Dedicated HIV clinicians with adequate training and credentialing are necessary to manage this specialized disease state and to reduce the overall number of medication errors associated with HIV/AIDS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Based on a retrospective study performed at our institution, 38% of inpatients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were found to have a medication error involving their anti-retroviral (ARV) and/or opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis medications. Objective: To determine the impact of a dedicated HIV-trained clinical pharmacist on the ARV and OI prophylaxis medication error rates at our institution. Methods: A prospective quality improvement project was conducted over a six month period to assess the impact of a dedicated HIV-trained clinical pharmacist on the ARV and OI prophylaxis medication error rates. IRB approval received. Results: There were 144 patients included in this analysis, who experienced a combined 76 medication errors. Compared to historical control study conducted at our institution, the percent of patients who experienced a medication error remained stable (38% vs. 39%, respectively) and the error rate per patient was similar (1.44 vs. 1.36, p=NS). The percent of medication errors that were corrected prior to discharge increased from 24% to 70% and the median time to error correction decreased from 42 hours to 11.5 hours (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Errors relating to ARV or OI prophylaxis medications remain frequent in inpatient people living with HIV/AIDS. After multiple interventions were implemented, ARV and OI prophylaxis medication errors were corrected faster and with greater frequency prior to discharge, however, similar rates of errors for patients existed. Dedicated HIV clinicians with adequate training and credentialing are necessary to manage this specialized disease state and to reduce the overall number of medication errors associated with HIV/AIDS

No disponible

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obesity is common among patients with HIV. The objective of this study was to characterize response to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in a cohort of obese incarcerated adults compared to a nonobese cohort. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted in an HIV telemedicine clinic. Patients with body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2 who received the same ART with >95% adherence for at least 6 months were matched to nonobese patients by age, gender, ART, CD4 count, and viral load at baseline. RESULTS: Twenty pairs were included, with an average BMI of 24 kg/m2 in the nonobese cohort and 35 kg/m2 in the obese cohort. No difference was observed in the proportion of patients who achieved virologic suppression or the change in CD4 count from baseline to 6 to 12 months. CONCLUSION: This study revealed no differences in immunologic recovery or virologic suppression between obese and nonobese patients in an adult correctional population.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous data reports inpatient antiretroviral (ARV) and opportunistic infection (OI) medication errors in as many as 86% of patients, with averages ranging from 1.16-2.7 errors/patient. OBJECTIVE: To determine the occurrence and type of inpatient ARV and OI medication errors at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, electronic medical chart review of patients with HIV/AIDS admitted between February 15, 2011- May 22, 2012 was conducted to assess the occurrence and type of ARV and OI medication errors. Secondary outcomes included assessing each medication with an error and evaluating its potential for a medication error, calculating a medication error rate per patient, evaluating whether a non-formulary (NF) medication impacted the error potential, determining whether a clinical pharmacist on service decreased the medication error rate, and assessing whether patients who experienced an error were more likely to have a longer length of stay (LOS). Analysis included descriptive statistics, averages, and Spearmen rank correlation. RESULTS: There were 344 patients included in this analysis, 132 (38%) experienced 190 medication errors (1.44 errors/patient). An omitted order was the most frequent ARV error and accounted for 30% (n=57) of total errors. There were 166 patients requiring OI medications, 37 patients experienced 39 medication errors. Omitting OI prophylaxis accounted for 31 errors. Only 45 of 190 (24%) errors were corrected prior to discharge. Being prescribed at least 1 NF medication was correlated with increased errors (n=193 patients "on NF medication", p<0.025, r=0.12). Coverage of a service by a clinical pharmacist did not affect the number of errors. Patients experiencing an error had a longer LOS (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Errors relating to ARV and OI medications are frequent in HIV-infected inpatients. More errors occurred in patients receiving NF medications. Suggested interventions include formulary revision, education, and training. Dedicated HIV clinicians with adequate training and credentialing may improve the management of this specialized disease state.

RESUMEN

Background: Previous data reports inpatient antiretroviral (ARV) and opportunistic infection (OI) medication errors in as many as 86% of patients, with averages ranging from 1.16-2.7 errors/patient. Objective: To determine the occurrence and type of inpatient ARV and OI medication errors at our institution. Methods: A retrospective, observational, electronic medical chart review of patients with HIV/AIDS admitted between February 15, 2011- May 22, 2012 was conducted to assess the occurrence and type of ARV and OI medication errors. Secondary outcomes included assessing each medication with an error and evaluating its potential for a medication error, calculating a medication error rate per patient, evaluating whether a non-formulary (NF) medication impacted the error potential, determining whether a clinical pharmacist on service decreased the medication error rate, and assessing whether patients who experienced an error were more likely to have a longer length of stay (LOS). Analysis included descriptive statistics, averages, and Spearmen rank correlation. Results: There were 344 patients included in this analysis, 132 (38%) experienced 190 medication errors (1.44 errors/patient). An omitted order was the most frequent ARV error and accounted for 30% (n=57) of total errors. There were 166 patients requiring OI medications, 37 patients experienced 39 medication errors. Omitting OI prophylaxis accounted for 31 errors. Only 45 of 190 (24%) errors were corrected prior to discharge. Being prescribed at least 1 NF medication was correlated with increased errors (n=193 patients “on NF medication”, p<0.025, r=0.12). Coverage of a service by a clinical pharmacist did not affect the number of errors. Patients experiencing an error had a longer LOS (p=0.02). Conclusions: Errors relating to ARV and OI medications are frequent in HIV-infected inpatients. More errors occurred in patients receiving NF medications. Suggested interventions include formulary revision, education, and training. Dedicated HIV clinicians with adequate training and credentialing may improve the management of this specialized disease state (AU)

Antecedentes: Datos existentes confirman que los errores de medicación en pacientes hospitalizados con antiretrovirales (ARV) e infecciones oportunistas (IO) aparecen en tantos como el 86% de los pacientes, con medias que oscilan entre 1,16 y 2,7 erroers por paciente. Objetivo: Determinar la aparición y el tipo de errores de medicación ARV y de IO en nuestra institución. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión retrospectiva y observacional de las historias clínicas electrónicas de los pacientes con VIH/SIDA ingresados entre el 15 de febrero de 2011 y el 22 de mayo de 2012, para evaluar la aparición y el tipo de errores de medicación ARV y de IO. Los resultados secundarios incluían evaluar las medicaciones con error y evaluar su posibilidad de error de medicación, calculando una tasa de erro de medicación por paciente, evaluando si una medicación de fuera del formulario impactaba en el potencial de error, determinando si un farmacéutico clínico disminuía la tasas de error de medicación, y evaluando si los pacientesque sufrían errores de medicación tenían más probabilidad de tener un tiempo de internamiento (LOS) mayor. Los análisis incluyeron estadística descriptiva, medias y correlaciones de Spearmen Rank. Resultados: Hubo 344 pacientes incluidos en este estudio, 132 (38%) sufrieron 190 errores de medicación (1,44 errores/paciente). Una dosis omitida fue el error de ARV más frecuente y alcanzó un 30% (n=55) del total de errores. Hubo 166 pacientes que necesitaron medicación para IO, 37 de ellos sufrieron 39 errores de medicación. Omitir la profilaxis de IO contabilizó 31 errores. Sólo 45 de los 190 errores (24%) fueron corregidos antes del alta. La prescripción de al menos 1 medicamento fuera del formulario estaba correlacionado con aumento de errores (n=193 pacientes con medicamentos fuera de formulario, p<0,025, r=0,12). La actuación de un farmacéutico clínico no afectó al número de errores. Los pacientes que sufrieron un error tuvieron una LOS mayor (p=0,02). Conclusiones: Los errores asociados a medicaciones ARV y para IO son frecuentes en pacientes infectados con VIH. Aparecen más errores en pacientes que reciben medicamentos fuera del formulario. Las intervenciones recomendadas incluyen la revisión del formulario, educación, y entrenamiento. Clínicos dedicados al VIH con entrenamiento adecuado y acreditados puede mejorar la gestión de esta enfermedad (AU)

Asunto(s)