RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ultraviolet-A1 phototherapy has been used to treat many inflammatory dermatoses. AIMS: To determine the efficacy and safety of ultraviolet-A1 phototherapy in Asian skin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a review of records of patients undergoing ultraviolet-A1 phototherapy at our dermatology unit in Singapore from January 2007 to January 2011. Their electronic medical records were reviewed and a standardized questionnaire was filled up for data collection and tabulation. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the difference in response between various groups for each characteristic. P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Our study comprised of 159 patients, of which 103 were patients with hand and foot eczema, 21 with atopic dermatitis, 17 with scleroderma and the remaining with miscellaneous dermatoses. Of these patients, 47.6% of patients with hand and feet eczema had good response after 10 sessions, which increased to 75% after 20 sessions and to 84.6% after 30 sessions. After 10 sessions, 47.6% of patients with atopic dermatitis had good response, which increased to 66.7% after 20 sessions. After 30 sessions, all the three remaining patients with atopic dermatitis experienced good response. For patients with scleroderma, only 11.8 and 10% had good response after 10 and 20 sessions, respectively, which increased to 40% after 30 sessions. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of our study include its retrospective design and, consequently, the lack of standardized treatment protocol, as well as subjective assessment in terms of clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Ultraviolet-A1 phototherapy appears to be efficacious for the treatment of hand and foot eczema as well as atopic dermatitis. However, in patients with scleroderma, the response was partial and needed a longer duration of treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We are on the cusp of the fourth Industrial Revolution which promises to revolutionize the way we live and work. Throughout history, as society and technology progress, so too have our workplace safety and health (WSH) strategies in regard to better knowledge and enhanced regulation. In this paper, we argue for a new WSH 4.0 strategy which requires us to adopt an adaptive and highly responsive approach to promote Total Worker Health in the face of rapid technological advancements and changes in employment relationships. To do so, we propose a multi-pronged strategy comprising (i) adaptive WSH solutions in regard to surveillance, risk assessment, and control measures leveraging on new technologies; (ii) effective multi-stakeholder dialogues for collaborative and sustainable solutions; (iii) an anticipatory WSH governance framework based upon shared values and cooperative responsibility; and (iv) professional development among WSH practitioners. This new WSH 4.0 strategy will enable WSH professionals to remain effective in this coming Industrial Revolution.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An outbreak of gastroenteritis (GE) occurred in community-dwelling adults in the Central Region of urban Singapore, in May 2016. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cause of the outbreak. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a case-cohort study on GE patients linked to the outbreak who presented to the emergency department of a tertiary-care hospital near the outbreak area, from 18 May to 11 June 2016. Stools were tested for gastrointestinal pathogens including rotavirus antigen and positive rotavirus samples were subject to genotyping. RESULTS: A total of 57 adult GE patients, with a median age of 40 (range 18 to 84) years, were included. Predominant symptoms were diarrhoea (98.2%), vomiting (64.9%), and abdominal discomfort (38.6%). Age 65 years and above (Adjusted OR 21.78, 95% CI 1.49-318.84; P = 0.02) was the only predictor of admission, after adjusting for comorbidities and clinical severity. Molecular microbiological investigations confirmed that the outbreak was caused by a novel human-bovine reassortant strain of rotavirus G8P[8] with DS-1-like backbone. Exposure to the market in the outbreak area was strongly associated with rotavirus infection (OR 46.14; 95% CI 43.04-49.25, P < 0.01). No particular food item could be identified as the outbreak cause. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of an outbreak of rotavirus G8P[8] in adults in an urban community that is not waterborne. Transmission was likely through fomites in the market and its surrounding areas, via consumption or contact with contaminated food items purchased from the market, and from person-to-person. The potential for novel G8P[8] strains to cause outbreaks cannot be overemphasized.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)