RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of embedding an immigration attorney in a primary care clinic to address immigration-related legal needs. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study of 42 legal clinic participants from May 2019-February 2020. Measures included psychological distress, understanding of legal options, and self-rated general health collected prior to, following, and 60-90 days after consultation. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in participants' understanding of their legal immigration options pre- (4.9, SD 2.9) and post-consult (8.6, SD 2.1), and 60 days later (7.0, SD 2.8) (F=11.0, p<.05), but self-rated health scores and distress did not significantly improve, although there was a high loss-to-follow up rate at 60 days (42.8%). Qualitative results underscored the interconnectedness of immigration status and health. DISCUSSION: Embedding immigration legal services in primary care improved patients' understanding of immigration-related legal options, although successfully mitigating the health impacts of vulnerable immigration status may take broader societal interventions.
Asunto(s)
Emigración e Inmigración , Derivación y Consulta , Humanos , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
This Boston-based pilot research was an exploratory study that integrated outpatient chaplaincy into a refugee and immigrant health primary care clinic. Patients were screened for spiritual distress and offered a meeting with chaplaincy interns. Forty-eight patients were seen in clinic, 28 were screened, and 9 met with a chaplain. Most frequent domains of spiritual distress were grief (n = 8), feelings of abandonment (n = 5), guilt (n = 4), betrayal (n = 4), fear of death (n = 3), shame (n = 3), and trust (n = 3). Faith was relevant to treatment decision-making for 6 patients. It was found that outpatient chaplaincy services are a feasible intervention to address spiritual distress in immigrant and refugee patients.