Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 14(7): 1061, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26997264
2.
Mil Med ; 180(6): e723-4, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26032391

RESUMEN

Acute hepatotoxicity secondary to infliximab can occur with or without autoimmunity. A growing body of infliximab drug-induced liver injury cases without autoantibody formation is emerging. Nearly all other reported cases occur after at least three doses. This suggests infliximab may have a direct cytotoxic effect on the liver. We report a case of drug-induced liver injury resulting after an initial dose of infliximab.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/etiología , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/efectos adversos , Infliximab/efectos adversos , Personal Militar , Adulto , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
3.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 13(5): 867-73, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25445765

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) often are treated empirically with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Patients whose symptoms are not reduced during the PPI trial are referred for further tests. We investigated whether patients referred for the evaluation of reflux symptoms had GERD. We also aimed to categorize patients with a poor response to PPIs into groups with hypersensitive esophagus or functional heartburn. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study, searching a clinical database of patients referred for GERD testing from 2006 through 2011. We collected data on all patients who underwent upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring, and were off PPIs for at least 1 week. Evidence of GERD was determined by an abnormal upper endoscopy or 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring. Further categorization was determined by impedance results and the symptom association probability index. RESULTS: We identified 221 patients (mean age, 47.6 ± 13.3 y; 56% male; 61% Caucasians); 97% previously had been prescribed PPIs, before they were tested. The patients had erosive esophagitis (n = 21; 10%), nonerosive reflux disease with increased pH (n = 61; 27%), nonerosive reflux disease with abnormal impedance (n = 18; 8%), hypersensitive esophagus (n = 30; 14%), functional heartburn (n = 18; 8%), functional disorders other than heartburn (n = 30; 14%), and undetermined disorders (n = 43; 19%). CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of 221 patients, roughly half of the patients referred for testing did not have evidence of GERD. Further categorization of patients can help guide diagnosis and management.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/patología , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Impedancia Eléctrica , Femenino , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA