Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Formos Med Assoc ; 111(10): 560-6, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23089691

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: A smooth enamel surface after the removal of a bracket from a tooth is essential for both esthetic demands and the prevention of plaque accumulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate enamel damage caused by three standardized debracketing techniques. METHODS: We established three standardized test devices based on the principles of the squeezing, shearing, and tensile testing methods, which were simulated using a How Plier (TASK 60-306), a Direct Bond Bracket Remover (TASK 60-335 T), and a Lift-Off Debracketing Instrument (3 M-Unitek 444-761), respectively. Thirty teeth in each group were evaluated after debracketing. An optical stereomicroscope and a CCD camera with a computerized image analysis system were used to ascertain the proportion of remnant adhesive area (RAE) on the enamel surface. Fractography was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The squeezing debracketing method exhibited the highest debonding force (54.3 ± 7.0 N) and the least damage to the enamel surface (RAE = 99.5% ± 2.4%). The tensile debracketing method preserved most of the adhesive on the enamel surface (RAE = 98.7% ± 3.3%) and required the least debonding force (6.8 ± 1.2 N). However, the shearing debracketing method exhibited a significantly higher debonding force (32.0 ± 8.2 N) and smaller RAE (77.3% ± 33.5%) compared to the tensile debracketing method (p < 0.05). Three specimens appeared to have vertical fractures on their enamel prisms when using the shearing method. CONCLUSION: With the proposed method, we conclude that the squeezing and tensile methods are acceptable for clinical use when debracketing, whereas the Direct Bond Bracket Remover may cause shearing failure, leading to a risk for enamel damage.


Asunto(s)
Desconsolidación Dental/efectos adversos , Desconsolidación Dental/métodos , Esmalte Dental/lesiones , Soportes Ortodóncicos , Cementos Dentales/efectos adversos , Desconsolidación Dental/instrumentación , Humanos , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo
2.
Dent Traumatol ; 22(4): 218-20, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16872392

RESUMEN

This 7-year-old girl experienced pain in her upper central incisors following a fall to the ground. Radiographic examination revealed immature upper central incisors with mid-root oblique and horizontal root fractures. Splinting was performed. When at 3 months, an electric pulp test was positive for both injured teeth, and after 5 months, the fracture lines had disappeared on the radiographs, the splint removed. After 2 years, clinical examination showed normal tooth color and position, with a positive response to the pulp test. Radiographs demonstrated continuous root development, although root canal narrowing was noted at the healed fracture sites.


Asunto(s)
Incisivo/lesiones , Fracturas de los Dientes/terapia , Raíz del Diente/lesiones , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Maxilar , Ferulas Periodontales , Cicatrización de Heridas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA