RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung carcinoma accounts to the most common cause of cancer globally. Optimal management of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) requires prognostic biomarkers that help in targeted therapy and identification of tumor subsets with a distinctive molecular profile that can foretell response to therapy. Quantitative analysis of circulating cell-free DNA is considered as a possible aid for lung cancer screening. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The main aim of our study was detection of the clinicopathological spectrum of NSCLC, immunohistochemical (IHC) study of lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and molecular expression of EGFR mutation using Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from blood samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a prospective and observational study conducted in the Department of Pathology in association with the Department of Chest Medicine in a tertiary care hospital for 18 months, done on 50 patients. Histological subtyping of lung carcinomas was done, followed by IHC analysis using P40, thyroid transcription factor (TTF1), EGFR, and ALK. Molecular analysis for EGFR mutation was done using FFPE and cfDNA from the patient's blood samples. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS: On histological subtyping, majority (66%) of the cases were found to be adenocarcinoma. All adenocarcinoma (66%) cases show TTF1 positivity and all squamous cell carcinoma (32%) cases show P40 positivity. All the ALK-positive (6%) cases were never smokers and histologically diagnosed as adenocarcinoma. About 58% of the NSCLC cases were found to be EGFR IHC positive. Formalin-fixed paraffin tissue (FFPE) showed EGFR mutation in 32% cases, of which majority were deletion (19, 28%) and rest (4%) of the cases involving mutation in exon 21. From cfDNA, mutations were noticed in 16% of the cases where majority involved deletion 19 (12%), whereas the rest of the cases were positive for missense mutation in exon 21 of the EGFR gene (2%) and compound heterozygous mutation involving deletion 19 and missense mutation for exon 21 (2%). On correlation of EGFR mutation studies from FFPE with that of cfDNA analysis, the study was statistically significant (P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: This study reports clinicopathological, immunochemical, and molecular analysis of EGFR among NSCLC cases. EGFR mutation detection from cfDNA has its advantage of being a noninvasive technique to avoid rebiopsy in cases of the progressive disease to detect resistance to a drug and emergence of a newer mutation. Mutation detection from FFPE samples still remains the gold standard for targeted therapy using EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. ALK rearrangement detection using IHC serves as an adjunct to EGFR diagnosis.

Asunto(s)

Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/patología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/sangre , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/sangre , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/sangre , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/genética , Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células/sangre , Receptores ErbB/genética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangre , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a serious concern in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), with an incidence of 46 to 72%. The purpose of this study was to compare the antiemetic efficacy of intravenous (iv) ondansetron 8 mg, ramosetron 0.3 mg, and palonosetron 0.075 mg for prophylaxis of PONV in high-risk patients undergoing LC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 87 female patients, 18 to 70 years of age (ASA I and II) and undergoing elective LC under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into three equal groups, the ondansetron group (8 mg iv; n=29), the ramosetron group (0.3 mg iv; n=29), and the palonosetron group (0.075 mg iv; n=29), and the treatments were given just after completion of surgery before extubation. The incidence of complete response (patients who had no PONV and needed no other rescue antiemetic medication), nausea, vomiting, retching, and need for rescue antiemetics over 24 hours after surgery were evaluated. RESULTS: The number of complete responders were 19 (65.5%) for ramosetron, 11 (37.9%) for palonosetron, and 10 (34.5%) for ondansetron, representing a significant difference overall (P=0.034) as well as between ramosetron and ondansetron (P=0.035). Comparison between ramosetron and palonosetron also showed a clear trend favoring the former (P=0.065). CONCLUSION: Ramosetron 0.3 mg iv was more effective than palonosetron 0.075 mg and ondansetron 8 mg in the early postoperative period, but there was no significant difference in the overall incidence of nausea suffered.