Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39244685

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to discuss the role of toxin inhibition in select infections and to provide recommendations for appropriate antimicrobial selection when toxin inhibition is indicated. SUMMARY: For select organisms, specifically Clostridioides difficile, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pyogenes, toxin production plays an integral role in overall disease pathogenesis and progression. Some expert recommendations include utilization of an antimicrobial with toxin inhibition properties as primary or adjunctive therapy for certain infections due to these organisms, but evolving data have made the choice of antitoxin agent less clear. Clindamycin has been the long-standing standard of care agent for toxin inhibition in necrotizing S. aureus and S. pyogenes infections, but linezolid shows promise as an alternative either in the setting of drug shortages or simply when clindamycin is not optimal, while tetracyclines require further study for this indication. The role for adjunctive toxin inhibition in C. difficile infection (CDI) is less defined, as current first-line therapies already have antitoxin properties. CONCLUSION: Toxin inhibition plays a key role in successful management of patients with infections due to toxin-producing organisms. Adjunctive therapy with a tetracycline could be considered in severe, fulminant CDI, but the associated benefit is variable. The benefit of antitoxin treatment for necrotizing S. aureus and S. pyogenes has been more consistently documented. Recent studies support linezolid as an alternative to clindamycin as an adjunctive S. aureus treatment or as monotherapy when appropriate.

3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 65(9): e0070821, 2021 08 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34181481

RESUMEN

In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Drug Safety Communication regarding fluoroquinolone-associated aortic aneurysm. This quasi-experimental study assessed antibiotic prescribing for 198 patients hospitalized with diabetic foot infection. Following the warning, median inpatient fluoroquinolone days of therapy (DOT) decreased from 3 to 0 days (P < 0.001), corresponding to increased beta-lactam DOT and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy enrollment. FDA communications may influence antibiotic selection and transitions of care, representing opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta , Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Aneurisma de la Aorta/tratamiento farmacológico , Comunicación , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Pie Diabético/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluoroquinolonas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36168468

RESUMEN

In 829 hospital encounters for patients with COVID-19, 73.2% included orders for antibiotics; however, only 1.8% had respiratory cultures during the first 3 hospital days isolating bacteria. Case-control analysis of 30 patients and 96 controls found that each antibiotic day increased the risk of isolating multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) in respiratory cultures by 6.5%.

5.
Infect Prev Pract ; 1(2): 100019, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34368680

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics have become a target of many antimicrobial stewardship programmes. Multiple post-marketing warnings from the Food and Drug Administration caution against use of this drug class for certain infections due to risk of harmful adverse effects outweighing benefit. Commonly employed strategies to affect antibiotic prescribing can be restrictive and without improvement in overall antibiotic appropriateness or decrease in collateral damage. AIM: To develop a strategy for sustainable optimization of FQ antibiotics. SETTING: Multi-state health-system of 14 hospitals and medical centers. METHODS: The health-system antimicrobial stewardship program identified the opportunity to improve FQ utilization. In collaboration with our data and analytics team, specific targets of FQ use in pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were established. Face-to-face provider education and prospective audit and feedback were the mainstays of the campaign. Enhancements to the electronic medical record to support the initiative were also implemented. FINDINGS: There was an overall decrease in FQ utilization by 56.9%. For pneumonia use of FQs decreased from 16.4% to 8.1% and in COPD changed from 29.6% to 9.7% over the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: A non-restrictive FQ optimization initiative based on education and feedback decreased both FQ consumption and total antibiotic use across a large multi-hospital health-system.

6.
Ann Pharmacother ; 51(9): 804-810, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28480750

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of bezlotoxumab (BEZ), a novel monoclonal antibody against Clostridium difficile toxin B. DATA SOURCES: A PubMed search was conducted for data between 1946 and April 2017 using MeSH terms bezlotoxumab, MK-6072, or MDX-1388 alone and the terms Clostridium difficile combined with monoclonal antibody or antitoxin. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: The literature search was limited to English-language studies that described clinical efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in humans and animals. Abstracts featuring prepublished data were also evaluated for inclusion. DATA SYNTHESIS: BEZ is indicated for adult patients receiving standard-of-care (SoC) antibiotics for C difficile infection (CDI) to prevent future recurrence. Two phase III trials-MODIFY I (n = 1452) and MODIFY II (n = 1203)-demonstrated a 40% relative reduction in recurrent CDI (rCDI) with BEZ compared with placebo (16.5% vs 26.6%, P < 0.0001). The most common adverse drug events associated with BEZ were mild to moderate infusion-related reactions (10.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with SoC antibiotics, BEZ is effective in decreasing rCDI. BEZ has no apparent effect on treatment of an initial CDI episode. In light of increasing rates of CDI, BEZ is a promising option for preventing recurrent episodes. The greatest benefit has been demonstrated in high-risk patients, though the targeted patient population is yet to be defined.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/uso terapéutico , Clostridioides difficile/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/efectos adversos , Proteínas Bacterianas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Toxinas Bacterianas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anticuerpos ampliamente neutralizantes , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Clostridioides difficile/metabolismo , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Humanos , Recurrencia , Prevención Secundaria , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA