RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcium computed tomography (CAC) is an important tool for identifying subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk stratification. Despite robust evidence and inclusion in current guidelines, CAC is considered investigational by some US insurance carriers and requires out-of-pocket expenses. CAC can be obtained via self-referral (SR) or physician referral (PR). We aimed to examine differences in patient, socioeconomic, and CAC characteristics between referral groups. METHODS: We evaluated demographic, medical history, and CAC results of consecutive patients with a CAC completed at one of multiple Wisconsin sites from March 1, 2019, to June 30, 2021. We separated patients into SR and PR groups. Through census data, we analyzed socioeconomic variables at the block level including race and ethnicity, median income, average household size, and high school completion in the areas where patients resided at the time of CAC. RESULTS: The final analysis included 19 726 patients: 13 835 (70.1%) PR and 5891 (29.9%) SR. Most patients in both groups were White (95.2% versus 95.1%), with the Black/African American population representing 2.7% (SR) and 2.3% (PR). The PR group had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. SR patients were more likely to have a score of 0 (41.2% versus 38.1%; P<0.001); PR patients had a higher prevalence of CAC >300 (16.8% versus 14.8%; P<0.001). SR patients were more likely to be women (55.1% versus 48.9%; P<0.001) and were found to live in higher income areas (19.5% versus 16.4%; P<0.001). Patients from low-income areas comprised the smallest proportion in both groups (7.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who obtain out-of-pocket CAC live predominantly in medium- and high-income areas, and patients from lower income locations are less likely to obtain CAC despite having more cardiovascular disease risk factors. Consideration should be made from a policy perspective to promote health equity and improve utilization of CAC testing among underrepresented groups.

Asunto(s)

Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Calcificación Vascular , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Calcio , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Promoción de la Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The serum marker Procalcitonin (PCT) has been shown to be a sensitive indicator of bacterial infection, but very little is known of its behavior in periprosthetic infection. In this study, PCT was compared with standard tests used to aid the diagnosis of infection. As a baseline, its pattern in uncomplicated hip and knee arthroplasty was investigated. METHODS: A prospective study of fifty-nine patients had bloods taken preoperatively, and on days 1, 3, 5, for PCT, C- reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and white cell count. RESULTS: Fifty patients (85%) had normal PCT values (< 0.5 ng/ml) and only 5 recorded a value > 1.0ng/ml. On day 5 only 1 patient had a value > 0.5ng/ml. The standard tests all showed sporadic elevations over the 3 days. PCT levels are not significantly elevated by the trauma of this surgery, as they are in other surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: PCT may be very useful in patients with suspected periprosthetic infection. KEYWORDS: Infection; Periprosthetic; Procalcitonin; C-reactive protein; Arthroplasty.