Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
BJUI Compass ; 2(3): 188-193, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35475129

RESUMEN

Objective: To define the value of a digital rectal exam (DRE) in the prostate-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) era. Prostate MRI is increasingly used in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) prior to biopsy. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in men with elevated PSA undergoing MRI followed by MRI fusion with systematic biopsy and men with elevated PSA/active surveillance with negative MRI followed by biopsy. Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics and DRE findings were collected. We examined performance of a positive DRE on sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC). Results: A total of 339 patients had elevated PSA and positive MRI followed by MRI fusion guided with systematic biopsy. Pre-biopsy DRE was documented in 286/339 patients, who were included in further analysis. About 81.6% positive, 78.7% questionable, and 55.8% negative DRE patients had CSPC. Positive DRE had 21.8% sensitivity and 91.3% specificity for CSPC. Positive or questionable DRE had 42.1% sensitivity and 81.5% specificity. Among 148 men with non-CSPC (GG1)-targeted biopsy, 28 had systematic biopsy with CSPC. About 5/28 had positive DRE and 8/28 had positive or questionable DRE. Twenty-seven patients were included who had elevated PSA/on active surveillance with negative MRI and biopsy done within 2 years. About 77.8% had negative, 7.4% had questionable, and 14.8% men had positive DRE. About 7.4% had CSPC and all had a negative DRE. Conclusions: Our study provides limited evidence for the value of a DRE. However, it does show occasional benefit in detecting GG2 or higher disease and given the lack of cost and side effects, should still be considered.

2.
Surg Innov ; 25(3): 242-250, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29557251

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is a disease of the elderly that is associated with high morbidity in those treated with radical cystectomy. In this observational study of patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy, we analyzed and compared patient-reported outcomes from those treated with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) methods versus those who received traditional perioperative care. METHODS: We enrolled patients who underwent radical cystectomy at a high-volume tertiary care referral center from November 2013 to December 2016, when the ERAS concept was being introduced into postoperative care at our institution. Patients reported symptom outcomes using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 to 5. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare symptom burden between the ERAS and traditional-care groups. General linear mixed-effects models were used for longitudinal data; linear regression models were used for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Patients (N = 383) reported dry mouth, disturbed sleep, drowsiness, fatigue, pain, and lack of appetite as the most severe symptoms. Compared with the traditional-care group, the ERAS group had significantly less pain (est. = -0.98, P = .005), drowsiness (est. = -0.91, P = .009), dry mouth (est. = -1.21, P = .002), disturbed sleep (est. = -0.97, P = .01), and interference with functioning (est. = -0.70, P = .022) (adjusted for age, sex, surgical technique, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy status). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ERAS practice significantly reduced immediate postoperative symptom burden in bladder cancer patients recovering from radical cystectomy, supporting the use of patient-reported symptom burden as an outcome measure in perioperative care.


Asunto(s)
Cistectomía , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Cistectomía/métodos , Cistectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología
3.
Urology ; 116: 114-119, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29578041

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate preoperative and intraoperative predictors of conversion to radical nephrectomy (RN) in a cohort of patients undergoing a planned partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review was conducted using our PN database that includes patients who were scheduled to undergo PN (regardless of the approach) but were converted to RN between August 1990 and December 2016. Reasons for conversion were collected from the operative report. Patient demographics and perioperative variables were compared with the successful PN group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess predictors of conversion. RESULTS: A total of 1857 patients were scheduled to undergo PN. Of these patients, 90 (5%) were converted to RN. The multivariate model showed that larger tumor size (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20, P = .040), higher RENAL nephrometry score (OR = 1.41, P = .001), hilar tumor or renal sinus invasion (OR = 2.80, P = .004), laparoscopic PN (OR = 7.34, P <.001), intraoperative bleeding (OR = 19.62, P <.001), positive surgical margin (OR = 31.85, P <.001), and advanced pathologic tumor-stage (T3 or T4) (OR = 7.29, P <.001) were associated with increased odds of intraoperative conversion to RN. CONCLUSION: The rate of conversion to RN was low in patients who were scheduled to undergo PN in this series. Larger tumor size with increasing complexity, hilar tumor location or renal sinus invasion, locally advanced tumors, laparoscopic PN but not robotic PN, bleeding complication, and positive surgical margin were associated with intraoperative conversion from scheduled PN to RN.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/patología , Riñón/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Periodo Perioperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral , Adulto Joven
4.
World J Urol ; 36(7): 1093-1101, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29488096

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate oncologic outcomes and management of patients with microscopic positive surgical margin (PSM) after partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We reviewed our database to identify patients who underwent PN between 1990 and 2015 for RCC and had PSM on final pathology. A 1:3 matching was performed to a negative surgical margin (NSM) cohort. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate survival and differences in outcomes, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to estimate the Hazards ratio. RESULTS: A total of 2297 patients underwent PN at our institution, of which 1863 (81%) had RCC. Microscopic PSM was found in 34 (1.8%) RCC patients who were matched to 100 patients with NSM. Of these 34 patients, local recurrence (n = 4), distant kidney recurrences (n = 4), and metastases (n = 5) developed during a median follow-up of 62 months. Bilateral tumors/tumors in a solitary kidney (n = 12/13, 92%), and multifocal tumors (n = 7/13, 54%) were found in patients who developed recurrence/metastasis. PSM patients were at a higher risk of shorter overall survival (p = 0.001), local recurrence-free survival (p = 0.003), distant recurrence-free survival (p = 0.032) and metastasis-free survival (p = 0.018). There was statistically significant association between PSM and bilateral tumors, prior treated RCC at presentation and higher nephrometry score in multivariable model. CONCLUSIONS: There was a low rate of microscopic PSM in our large cohort of patients undergoing PN despite tumor complexity. Higher nephrometry score, bilateral tumors, and prior treated RCC independently predicted PSM which showed worse survival, recurrence and metastasis compared to patients with NSM.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Márgenes de Escisión , Nefrectomía/métodos , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Nefrectomía/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Surgery ; 158(2): 413-9, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26054317

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adherence to prophylactic antibiotics guidelines is challenging and poorly documented. We hypothesized that a multiphase, multifaceted quality improvement initiative would engage relevant stakeholders, address known barriers to adoption, and improve overall adherence. METHODS: From 2011 to 2014, a series of interventions were introduced in the pediatric operating rooms. After each interventional period, prospective assessments were performed to record the antibiotic type, dose, timing, and redosing according to the guidelines. Perioperative factors that may influence guideline adherence were analyzed. Spearman's rank correlation, analysis of variance, and χ(2) tests were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1,052 operations were observed, and 629 (60%) required prophylactic antibiotics. Adherence to all 4 guideline components remained unchanged (54-55%, P = .38). Redosing significantly improved (7-53%, P = .02), but correct type decreased (98-70%, P < .01). The percentage of cases in which only one antibiotic guideline component was missed remained unchanged (35-34%, P = .46). Adherence to guidelines was not significantly associated with American Society of Anesthesiologists class, surgical specialty, patient weight, anesthesia provider, or surgical wound class. CONCLUSION: Despite multiple interventions to improve antibiotic prophylaxis, overall adherence did not improve. Most interventions were directed at the point of administration in the operating room; future implementation strategies should focus on the perioperative setting.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Lista de Verificación , Niño , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Texas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA